Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 55 Sayfa Aralığı: 45 - 56 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17350/HJSE19030000254 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil

Öz:
Liquid storage tanks storing liquids such as gasoline and LNG are very important structures. These structures can be damaged because of the loss of strength that may occur due to external influences. It is known that a considerable amount of damage occurred in tank structures, which are one of the industrial structures, happened during the earthquakes occurred in the past. Determining the behavior of the buildings which are under the effect of an earthquake is very important in order to prevent damage to the building during a possible earthquake. The behavior of structures built on soft soils is considerably different from that of structures constructed on a rigid soil. For this purpose, in this study, a steel tank structure was modeled by considering the different soil profiles. During modelling, an elastic spring method was used for the soil while the finite element method was used for the tank and the basic interaction of the soil and foundation structure which are exposed to earthquake loads were examined.Dynamic analyzes were carried out using the time history method by taking into consideration 11 earthquake records having the different properties. According to the results of the displacement and stress values obtained; It was observed that the values obtained in the earthquakes, whose peak ground acceleration and ground velocity are large, are higher than other earthquakes.It was seen that as the soil resistance increases, the strength of the structure increases during earthquakes.
Anahtar Kelime: time history analysis earthquake liquid storage tank structures spring stiffness. The structure-soil-interaction

Evaluation of Science Teachers' Opinions on Students With Special Education

Öz:
The concept of the individual in need of special education includes not only disabled children but also gifted children. Individuals with special education needs can benefit from different education programs. One of these programs is the Science Curriculum. In order to achieve the objectives and achievements in the science course, it is necessary to know what the arrangements made by the teachers in the curriculum can be and to diversify the alternatives that can be used in the materials prepared for the students in order to teach the students who need special education. Therefore, this aims to evaluate the views of science teachers about individuals who need special education. This research is qualitative research designed in a phenomenological pattern. The study group of the research consists of science teachers working in Antalya province Alanya in the 2020-2021 academic year. Data were collected with a semi-structured interview form. Research findings revealed that science teachers made some adaptations for students who need special education. It is recommended to develop sample measurement-evaluation scales to monitor the academic success and development of students in need of special education.
Anahtar Kelime: interview

Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Özel Eğitime Gereksinimi Olan Öğrencilere İlişkin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Özel eğitime gereksinimi olan birey kavramı, sadece engelli çocukları değil, üstün yetenekli çocukları da kapsamaktadır. Özel eğitime gereksinimi olan bireyler farklı öğretim programlarından yararlanabilmektedirler. Bu programlardan birisi de Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programıdır. Fen bilimleri dersinde hedef ve kazanımlara ulaşılabilmesi için ders programında öğretmenlerin yapmış olduğu düzenlemelerin neler olabileceğinin bilinmesi ve fen bilimleri öğretmelerinin özel eğitime gereksinimi olan öğrencilere ders anlatmak için öğrenciye yönelik hazırlanan materyallerde kullanılabilecek alternatiflerin çeşitlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle bu araştırmada fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin özel eğitime gereksinimi olan bireylere ilişkin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırma olgubilim deseninde tasarlanmış nitel bir araştırmadır. Çalışma grubu 2020-2021 eğitim öğretim yılında Antalya ili Alanya ilçesinde görev yapan 20 fen bilimleri öğretmeninden oluşmaktadır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin özel eğitime gereksinimi olan öğrencilere ilişkin bazı uyarlamalar yaptıklarını ortaya koymuştur. Özel eğitime gereksinimi olan öğrencilerin akademik başarısı ve gelişimlerini izleme amaçlı örnek ölçme-değerlendirme ölçekleri geliştirilmesi önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: özel gereksinimi olan öğrenciler Fen eğitimi görüşme nitel araştırma yöntemi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Altun, T., & Uzuner, F. G. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik görüşleri. International Journal of Social Science, 44, 33-49.
  • 1. USGS Circular 1193. Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999; 2000.
  • Çepni, S. (2010). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına Giriş. Celepler Matbaacılık.
  • 2. Palanci M, Kayhan AH, Demir A. A statistical assessment on global drift ratio demands of mid-rise RC buildings using code-compatible real ground motion records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 16 (11) (2018) 5453-5488.
  • Courtade, G.R., Spooner, F., & Browder, D.M. (2007). Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 43-49.
  • 3. Yazici G, Cili F. Evaluation of the liquid storage tank failures in the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake. In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, pp. 12-17, 2008 January.
  • Elemek, M. A. (2008). Öğrenme bozukluğu olan çocuklarda benlik saygısının ve kaygı durumunun incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • 4. Saatcioglu M, Mitchell D, Tinawi N, Gardner NJ, Gillies AG, Ghobarah A, Anderson, DL, Lau D. The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake - damage to structures. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 28 (2001) 715-737.
  • Gündoğan, A. (2002). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında çalışan öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar (Denizli ili örneği). Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
  • 5. Kianoush M, Ghaemmaghami A. The effect of earthquake frequency content on the seismic behavior of concrete rectangular liquid tanks using the finite element method incorporating soil-structure interaction. Eng. Struct. 33 (7) (2011) 2186-2200.
  • Çakmak, S., Karakoç, T., & Şafak, P. (2016). Görme engelliler okullarındaki ve kaynaştırma eğitim ortamlarındaki az gören öğrencilerin işlevsel görme becerilerinin karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(187), 165–179.
  • 6. Chung MA, Larkin TJ. Nonlinear Foundation Response of Liquid Storage Tanks under Seismic Loading. Proceedings of New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference. 2008.
  • Kızılaslan, A., & Sözbilir, M. (2017). Görme yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin maddenin halleri ve ısı ünitesini öğrenmeye yönelik ihtiyaç analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 274–290.
  • 7. Kramer SL. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River; 1996.
  • Kızılaslan, A., & Sözbilir, M. (2018). Maddenin halleri ve ısı öğretim tasarım modelinin değerlendirilmesi öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 48(48), 111–127.
  • 8. Veletsos AS, Meek JW. Dynamic behaviour of building foundation systems. Earthq. Eng Struct Dyn. 3 (1974) 121–38.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2016). Science learning in special education: The case for constructed versus instructed learning. exceptionality, 15(2), 57-74.
  • 9. Scarfone R, Morigi M, Conti R. Assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects for tall buildings: A 3D numerical approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 128 (2020) 105864.
  • Mastropieri M.A., Scruggs T.E., Norland J.J., Berkeley S., McDuffie K., Tornquist E.H. & Connors N. (2006) Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 130– 137.
  • 10. Mezaini N. Effects of soil-structures interactions on the analysis of cylindrical tanks. ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 11 (1) (2006) 50–57.
  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8.Sınıflar). https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937 adresinden 3 Kasım 2021 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • 11. Bhattacharya K, Dutta SC. Assessing lateral period of building frames incorporating soil-flexibility. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 269 (3-5) (2004) 795-821.
  • McGinnis, G. (2013). Teaching science to learners with special needs. Theory into Practice, 52(1), 43-50.
  • 12. Dutta CH, Bhattacharya K, Roy R. Response of low rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 24 (2004) 893–914.
  • Mulvey, B. K., Chiu, J. L., Ghosh, R., & Bell, R. L. (2016). Special education teachers' nature of science ınstructional experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 554-578.
  • 13. Ghandil M, Behnamfar F. A near-field method for dynamic analysis of structures on soft soils including inelastic soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 75 (2015) 1–17.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • 14. Meng X, Li X, Xu X. Earthquake Response of Cylindrical Storage Tanks on an Elastic Soil. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 7 (2019) 433-444.
  • Özdemir, S. (2011). The effects of the first step to success program on academic engagement behaviors of turkish students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 168–177.
  • 15. Dutta S, Mandal A, Dutta SC. Soil–structure interaction in dynamic behavior of elevated tanks with alternate frame staging configurations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 227 (4-5) (2004) 825- 853.
  • Özdemir, S., Gürel Selimoğlu, Ö., Töret, G., & Suna, H. E. (2017). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuklar ve normal gelişim gösteren çocukların statik ve hareketli materyallerde yüz işlemelerinin karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 271–290.
  • 16. Zhao C, Chen J, Wang J, Yu N, Xu Q. Seismic mitigation performance and optimization design of NPP water tank with internal ring baffles under earthquake loads. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 318 (2017) 182-201.
  • Özgüven, İ.E. (1999). Çağdaş eğitimde psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik. PDREM Yayıncılık.
  • 17. Zhao C, Chen J, Xu Q. FSI effects and seismic performance evaluation of water storage tank of AP1000 subjected to earthquake loading. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 280 (2014) 372-388.
  • Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Science learning in special education: the case for constructed versus ınstructed learning. Exceptionality, 15(2), 57-74.
  • 18. Nicolici S, Bilegan RM. Fluid structure interaction modeling of liquid sloshing phenomena in flexible tanks. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 258 (2013) 51-56.
  • Sözbilir, M., Zorluoğlu, S. L., & Kızılaslan, A. (2019). Görme yetersizliği olan öğrencilere yönelik geliştirilen fen etkinliklerin bilimsel süreç becerileri öğrenimine etkisi: madde ve ısı. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 8(8), 172–192.
  • 19. Patel CN, Sharma, K, Patel HS. Modeling of Soil-Structure Interaction as Finite Element Using Using SAP2000. 2011.
  • Vannest, K. J., Mason, B. A., Brown, L., Dyer, N., Maney, S. and Adıgüzel, T. (2009). Instructional settings in science for students with disabilities: implications for teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(4), 353-363.
  • 20. Seleemah, AA, El-Sharkawy M. Seismic analysis and modeling of isolated elevated liquid storage tanks. Earthquake and Structures, 2 (4) (2011) 397-412.
  • Wiener, J., & Timmermanis, V. (2012). Social relationships: R. B. Wong and D. L. Butler (Ed). Learning about learning disabilities, (89-140). USA: Elsevier.
  • 21. Livaoğlu R, Doğangün A. Simplified seismic analysis procedures for elevated tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interaction. Journal of fluids and structures, 22 (3) (2006) 421-439.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin yayıncılık
  • 22. Livaoglu, R. and Dogangün A. Seismic behaviour of cylindrical elevated tanks with a frame supporting system on various subsoil. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences 14 (2007) 133-145.
  • Yiğiter, S. (2005). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel öğrenme güçlüğüne ilişkin bilgi düzeyleri ile özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan çocukların kaynaştırılmasına yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • 23. Gazetas G. Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: state of the art. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2 (1) (1983) 2-4.
  • 24. Habibullah and Wilson. SAP 2000 User Manual, Computer Program, Computers and Structures. Berkeley, USA.1998.
  • 25. Roder HM. Liquid Densities of Oxygen, Nitrogen, Argon and Parahydrogen (Metric Supplement), Cryogenic Division, Institute for Basic Standards (U.S.). National Bureau of Standards, Technical Note 361; 1974.
  • 26. Housner GW. The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 53 (2) (1963) 381-387.
  • 27. Housner GW. Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 47 (1) (1957) 15-35.
  • 28. Jacobsen LS. Impulsive hydrodynamics of fluid inside a cylindrical tank and of fluid surrounding a cylindrical pier. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 39 (3) (1949) 189-204.
  • 29. TBDY, Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, Ankara,2018.
  • 30. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
  • 31. Akkar S, Yazgan U, Gülkan P. Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131 (7) (2005) 1014-1024.
  • 32. Kayabalı, K. Geoteknik Deprem Mühendisliği, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara, 2003.
  • 33. Özmen A. Yakın ve uzak fay hareketlerine maruz tarihi yığma bir köprünün sismik performansının değerlendirilmesi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.
APA CARHOGLU A, Durmaz O, KIZILASLAN A, Yazıcıoğlu T (2022). Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. , 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
Chicago CARHOGLU Asuman Işıl,Durmaz Osman,KIZILASLAN Aydın,Yazıcıoğlu Tansel Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. (2022): 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
MLA CARHOGLU Asuman Işıl,Durmaz Osman,KIZILASLAN Aydın,Yazıcıoğlu Tansel Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. , 2022, ss.45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
AMA CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. . 2022; 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
Vancouver CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. . 2022; 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
IEEE CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T "Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil." , ss.45 - 56, 2022. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
ISNAD CARHOGLU, Asuman Işıl vd. "Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil". (2022), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000254
APA CARHOGLU A, Durmaz O, KIZILASLAN A, Yazıcıoğlu T (2022). Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, 0(55), 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
Chicago CARHOGLU Asuman Işıl,Durmaz Osman,KIZILASLAN Aydın,Yazıcıoğlu Tansel Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 0, no.55 (2022): 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
MLA CARHOGLU Asuman Işıl,Durmaz Osman,KIZILASLAN Aydın,Yazıcıoğlu Tansel Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, vol.0, no.55, 2022, ss.45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
AMA CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering. 2022; 0(55): 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
Vancouver CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering. 2022; 0(55): 45 - 56. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
IEEE CARHOGLU A,Durmaz O,KIZILASLAN A,Yazıcıoğlu T "Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil." Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, 0, ss.45 - 56, 2022. 10.17350/HJSE19030000254
ISNAD CARHOGLU, Asuman Işıl vd. "Investigation of the Interaction of the Tank Structures Exposed to Earthquake with the Soil". Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 55 (2022), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000254