Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 21 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022

Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?

Öz:
Objective: The location of arterial occlusions can be predictive in the prognosis and endovascular treatment of acute stroke patients. We aimed to determine if the location of the stent retriever being on the superior or inferior division of the middle cerebral artery has an effect on the success and clinical outcomes of recanalization in middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Materials and Methods: Data were generated for the period from May 2015 to January 2019. Divisions of middle cerebral artery were assigned to the 2 groups as superior and inferior divisions according to the anatomical classification. The dominant trunk of the artery was assessed on the last angiogram image. Results: We eventually included 81/90 patients (mean age: 62 ± 13.5; 63% [51/81] female; mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale rating: 16.3 ± 3.6) treated with thrombectomy. The branches of the middle cerebral artery were as follows: 40 (49.4%) co-dominant, 22 (27.2%) inferior, and 19 (23.5%) superior division dominant. The stent retriever was placed in the dominant trunk in 22/41(53.7%) cases at first pass. When stent retriever was placed in the dominant middle cerebral artery trunk, the rate of successful recanalization was very high with the first pass of thrombectomy (P < .001). Conclusion: Stent retriever placement within the superior or inferior middle cerebral artery trunk does not have an effect on the success rate of recanalization; however, its placement in the dominant trunk can increase the chance of complete recanalization to be early.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Papazova M, Zhivadinovik J, Trpkovska B, et al. Anatomy of middle cerebral artery. Acta Morphol. 2012;9(1):5-9.
  • 2. Cilliers K, Page BJ. Anatomy of the middle cerebral artery: cortical branches, branching pattern and anomalies. Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(5):671-681. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Brzegowy P, Polak J, Wnuk J, Łasocha B, Walocha J, Popiela TJ. Middle cerebral artery anatomical variations and aneurysms: a retrospective study based on computed tomography angiography findings. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(3):434-440. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Jeyakumar R, Veerapandian R. Study of anatomical variations in middle cerebral artery. Int J Sci Stud. 2018;5(12):5-10.
  • 5. Maslehaty H, Deuschl C, Kleist B, Göricke S, Sure U, Müller O. Computed tomography- and magnetic resonance image-based analysis of the anatomical variations of the Sylvian fissure and characteristics of the middle cerebral artery. Clin Pract. 2017;7(1):890. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Umansky F, Juarez SM, Dujovny M,et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the proximal segments of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(3):458-467. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46-e110. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Chamorro Á, Blasco J, López A, et al. Complete reperfusion is required for maximal benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients. Sci Rep 2017:7(1):11636.
  • 9. Maus V, Brehm A, Tsogkas I, Henkel S, Psychogios MN. Stent retriever placement in embolectomy: the choice of the post-bifurcational trunk influences the first-pass reperfusion result in M1 occlusions. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2019;11(3):237- 240. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Qureshi IA, Maud A, Cruz-Flores S, Rodriguez GJ. Main trunk and division middle cerebral artery occlusions: differences in recanalization times, number of stent retriever passes and clinical outcomes: A single-center experience. Interv Neurol. 2016;4(3-4):83-89. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Koge J, Kato S, Hashimoto T, Nakamura Y, Kawajiri M, Yamada T. Vessel Wall injury after stent retriever thrombectomy for internal carotid artery occlusion with a duplicated middle cerebral artery. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:54-58. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, et al. First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke. 2018;49(3):660-666. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Srivatsa S, Duan Y, Sheppard JP, et al. Cerebral vessel anatomy as a predictor of first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large-vessel occlusion. J Neurosurg. 2020:1-9.
  • 14. Patro SN, Iancu D. Dual-stent retrieval for mechanical thrombectomy of refractory clot in acute stroke as a rescue technique. CMAJ. 2017;189(17):E634-E637. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Asadi H, Brennan P, Martin A, Looby S, O'Hare A, Thornton J. Double stent-retriever technique in endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery saddle embolus. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(2):e9-e11. [CrossRef]
APA ŞENGEZE N, GİRAY S (2022). Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. , 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
Chicago ŞENGEZE Nihat,GİRAY Semih Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. (2022): 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
MLA ŞENGEZE Nihat,GİRAY Semih Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. , 2022, ss.17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
AMA ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. . 2022; 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
Vancouver ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. . 2022; 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
IEEE ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S "Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?." , ss.17 - 21, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
ISNAD ŞENGEZE, Nihat - GİRAY, Semih. "Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?". (2022), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
APA ŞENGEZE N, GİRAY S (2022). Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54(1), 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
Chicago ŞENGEZE Nihat,GİRAY Semih Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54, no.1 (2022): 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
MLA ŞENGEZE Nihat,GİRAY Semih Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.54, no.1, 2022, ss.17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
AMA ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
Vancouver ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 17 - 21. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
IEEE ŞENGEZE N,GİRAY S "Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54, ss.17 - 21, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281
ISNAD ŞENGEZE, Nihat - GİRAY, Semih. "Does the Stent Retriever Placement in the Division of Middle Cerebral Artery Affect the Recanalization Success in M1 Occlusions?". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54/1 (2022), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20281