Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 12 - 16 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349 İndeks Tarihi: 24-06-2022

Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications

Öz:
Objective: This article aims to evaluate the efficacy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before standard tru-cut biopsy in making prostate cancer diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 patients with prostate biopsy indications were prospectively evaluated between May 2017 and October 2018. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was taken after obtaining a written informed consent from all patients. Cognitive transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging results. Standard tru-cut biopsy was included to reduce false-negative rate. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 software. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.94 ± 7.90 (48-84) years. Around 19.37% of the patients had a specificity in the digital rectal exam. The mean prostate-specific antigen value of the patients with adenocarcinoma was 42.1 ng/mL and it was 10.2 ng/mL in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. It was observed that the prostate-specific antigen values in prostatic adenocarcinomas were significantly higher than those in benign prostate hyperplasia (P < .001). The results of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the biopsy were 100% similar in terms of zones in patients with adenocarcinoma. All of the biopsy results of the patients who were evaluated to have normal prostate tissue in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated as benign prostate hyperplasia; on the other hand, 13.6% of PI-RADS 2 lesions, 14% of PI-RADS 3 lesions, 31.8% of PI-RADS 4 lesions, and 85.7% of PI-RADS 5 lesions were determined to be adenocarcinoma. It was observed that the prevalence of adenocarcinoma increased as the risk elevated in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (P < .001). Conclusion: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging evaluated by experienced radiologists may be instructive of urologists and reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Barsouk A, Padala SA, Vakiti A, et al. Epidemiology, staging and management of prostate cancer. Med Sci (Basel). 2020;8(3). [CrossRef]
  • 2. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63-89. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):31. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Hugosson J, Carlsson S, Aus G, et al. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):725-732. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparén P, Norlén BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology. 1997;50(4):562-566. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Mostofi FK, Sesterhenn IA, Davis CJ, Jr. Prostatic carcinoma: problems in the interpretation of prostatic biopsies. Hum Pathol. 1992;23(3):223- 241. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U, et al. MRIguided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol. 2006;50(4):738-748. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology. 2011;261(1):46-66. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746-757. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Bomers JG, Barentsz JO. Standardization of multiparametric prostate MR imaging using PIRADS. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:431680. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Miah S, Hosking-Jervis F, Connor MJ, et al. A multicentre analysis of the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer following transperineal image-fusion targeted and nontargeted systematic prostate biopsy in men at risk. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(3):262-269. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Latifoltojar A, Appayya MB, Barrett T, Punwani S. Similarities and differences between Likert and PIRADS v2.1 scores of prostate multiparametric MRI: a pictorial review of histology-validated cases. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(11):895.e1-895.e15. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Melia J, Moss S, Johns L, Rates of prostate-specific antigen testing in general practice in England and Wales in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a cross-sectional study. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):51-56. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Frankish H. 15 million new cancer cases per year by 2020, says WHO. Lancet. 2003;361(9365):1278. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Heijnsdijk EA, der Kinderen A, Wever EM, et al. Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(11):1833-1838. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Shah N, Ioffe V, Huebner T, Hristova I. Prostate biopsy characteristics: a comparison Between the Pre- and post-2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate cancer screening guidelines. Rev Urol. 2018;20(2):77-83. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Gittes RF. Carcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(4):236-245. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Rapisarda S, Bada M, Crocetto F, et al. The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/ robotic radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(12):4178-4184. [CrossRef]
  • 20. de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):343-351. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Choi YH, Kang MY, Sung HH, et al. Comparison of cancer detection rates between TRUS-guided biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy according to PSA level in biopsy-naive patients: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):e19-e25. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Osses DF, van Asten JJ, Kieft GJ, Tijsterman JD. Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to prostate imaging reporting and data system score. World J Urol. 2017;35(2):207-212. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Rieker P, et al. Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. BJU Int. 2013;112(8):1080-1087. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (Promis): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815-822. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Bass EJ, Freeman A, Jameson C, et al. Prostate cancer diagnostic pathway: is a one-stop cognitive MRI targeted biopsy service a realistic goal in everyday practice? A pilot cohort in a tertiary referral centre in the UK. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e024941. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Popita C, Popita AR, Andrei A, et al. Interobserver agreement in prostate cancer detection using multiparametric MRI. J BUON. 2018;23(4):1061-1069.
  • 27. Kam J, Yuminaga Y, Krelle M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study. BJU Int. 2019;124(2):297-301. [CrossRef]. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
  • 28. Bryant RJ, Hobbs CP, Eyre KS, et al. Comparison of prostate biopsy with or without Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection: an observational cohort study. J Urol. 2019;201(3):510-519. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Pääkkö E, et al. Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer based on elevated prostate-specific antigen values: results from a randomized prospective blinded controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):419-425. [CrossRef]
APA ALTAY M, ÖZKAYA F, DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş, BEDİR F, kocaturk h, CİNİSLİOĞLU A, Yılmaz S, Yapanoglu T (2022). Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. , 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
Chicago ALTAY MEHMET SEFA,ÖZKAYA Fatih,DEMİRDÖĞEN Şaban Oğuz,BEDİR FEVZİ,kocaturk hüseyin,CİNİSLİOĞLU AHMET EMRE,Yılmaz Sinan,Yapanoglu Turgut Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. (2022): 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
MLA ALTAY MEHMET SEFA,ÖZKAYA Fatih,DEMİRDÖĞEN Şaban Oğuz,BEDİR FEVZİ,kocaturk hüseyin,CİNİSLİOĞLU AHMET EMRE,Yılmaz Sinan,Yapanoglu Turgut Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. , 2022, ss.12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
AMA ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. . 2022; 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
Vancouver ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. . 2022; 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
IEEE ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T "Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications." , ss.12 - 16, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
ISNAD ALTAY, MEHMET SEFA vd. "Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications". (2022), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
APA ALTAY M, ÖZKAYA F, DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş, BEDİR F, kocaturk h, CİNİSLİOĞLU A, Yılmaz S, Yapanoglu T (2022). Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54(1), 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
Chicago ALTAY MEHMET SEFA,ÖZKAYA Fatih,DEMİRDÖĞEN Şaban Oğuz,BEDİR FEVZİ,kocaturk hüseyin,CİNİSLİOĞLU AHMET EMRE,Yılmaz Sinan,Yapanoglu Turgut Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54, no.1 (2022): 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
MLA ALTAY MEHMET SEFA,ÖZKAYA Fatih,DEMİRDÖĞEN Şaban Oğuz,BEDİR FEVZİ,kocaturk hüseyin,CİNİSLİOĞLU AHMET EMRE,Yılmaz Sinan,Yapanoglu Turgut Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.54, no.1, 2022, ss.12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
AMA ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
Vancouver ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(1): 12 - 16. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
IEEE ALTAY M,ÖZKAYA F,DEMİRDÖĞEN Ş,BEDİR F,kocaturk h,CİNİSLİOĞLU A,Yılmaz S,Yapanoglu T "Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54, ss.12 - 16, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349
ISNAD ALTAY, MEHMET SEFA vd. "Comparison of Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Biopsy Indications". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54/1 (2022), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20349