Purpose: Evaluation of the effectiveness of percutaneous drainage methods for intraabdominal abscesses, guiding method of the procedures, the complications, the culture antibiogram results from the samples taken, and the clinical results of our patients. Materials and methods: Our study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Electronic medical records of patients undergoing percutaneous drainage treatment in our hospital interventional radiology department between 01/06/2017-01/06/2019 were examined. The age and gender of the patients, the method of performing the procedure, the modality used for the guideline, the catheter used, the complications that occurred, the number of days the catheter was left, and the culture antibiogram results of the patients were investigated. Results: It was observed that 187 of the catheter placement procedures with percutaneous drainage were applied Seldinger technique and 6 of them Trocar method. Due to reasons such as catheter malposition, catheter occlusion, recurrence of the abscess, insufficient drainage, 89 (50%) of the abscesses with percutaneous drainage were required to perform a second procedure, and 75 (42%) of the patients who underwent recurrent catheter drainage recovered after the treatment. Our overall success rate in percutaneous drainage treatment for intra-abdominal abscesses was calculated as 84.9%. Conclusion: For intra-abdominal abscesses, if there is no intra-abdominal pathology associated with abscess, percutaneous drainage procedure is considered as the first choice in treatment. Early period complications of percutaneous drainage are almost none and it is a safe and effective treatment method. Studies need to be carried out on which abscesses should only be treated with antibiotics, which ones should be aspirated with a fine needle, which ones should be placed with a drainage catheter, and which ones require open surgical treatment.