The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 131 - 134 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220 İndeks Tarihi: 17-06-2022

The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section

Öz:
Introduction: In our study, patients who applied for abdominal wall mass and pain after cesarean section and were examined and treated and diagnosed endometriosis were evaluated in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), number of cesareans, clinical signs, size of endometriosis and surgical characteristics, as well as therapy and results. Methods: January 2001-December 2021 in our clinic after cesarean section, surgery due to a painful mass in the abdominal wall and pathologically diagnosed endometriosis cases were retrospectively investigated. Age, number of cesareans, clinical signs, size of endometriosis and surgical characteristics and therapy results were recorded. Four patients were diagnosed with endometriosis with a tru-cut biopsy. All patients underwent primary mass excision. Results: A total of 14 patients were identified. The average age of the patients was 35.9 and the average BMI was 26.81. All patients were admitted with a painful mass at the cesarean site. Only four patients had multiple cesarean sections. Ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography were evaluated. Desmoid tumor, foreign body reaction, granuloma, abscess and endometriosis were identified in their preliminary diagnosis. Endometriosis was established by tru-cut biopsy in four patients. Primary mass excision was performed for all the patients. In one patient, prolene mesh repair was performed, while in other patients primary repair was performed. In all patients, pathological diagnosis was reported as endometriosis ekstarna. Conclusion: The diagnosis of endometriosis should be kept in mind when diagnosing patients with pain and/or mass complaints at the site of surgery after cesarean section.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Nezhat FR, Shamshirsaz AA, Yildirim G, Nezhat C, Nezhat C. Pelvic pain, endometriosis, and the role of the gynecologist. Altcheck A, Deligdisch L, editors. Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Gynecology. 1st ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.p.174-94.
  • 2. Alessandro P, Luigi N, Felice S, Maria PA, Benedetto MG, Stefano A. Research development of a new GnRH antagonist (Elagolix) for the treatment of endometriosis: a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295: 827- 32.
  • 3. De Cicco Nardone C, Terranova C, Plotti F, Ricciardi R, Capriglione S, Luvero D, et al. The role of ovarian fossa evaluation in patients with ovarian endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 869-73.
  • 4. Bratu D, Chicea R, Ciprian T, Beli L, Dan S, Mihetiu A, et al. A rare case of ileus caused by ileum endometriosis. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 26: 24-6.
  • 5. Hekimoğlu L, Tatlıkazan S. Incisional endometriosis after caesarean section: a case report. Türk Aile Hek Derg 2013; 17: 23-5.
  • 6. Pas K, Joanna SM, Renata R, Skręt A, Barnaś E. Prospective study concerning 71 cases of caesarean scar endometriosis (CSE). J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 37: 775-8.
  • 7. Aydin O. Scar endometriosis - a gynaecologic pathology often presented to the general surgeon rather than the gynaecologist: report of two cases. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2007; 392: 105-9.
  • 8. Uysal A, Mun S, Taner CE. Endometrioma in abdominal scars: case reports of four cases and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 805-8.
  • 9. Uçar M, Şanlıkan F, Göçmen A. Surgical Treatment of Scar Endometriosis Following Cesarean Section, a Series of 12 Cases. Indian J Surg 2015; 77:682-6.
  • 10. Mistrangelo M, Gilbo N, Cassoni P, Micalef S, Faleti R, Miglietta C, et al. Surgical scar endometriosis. Surg Today 2014; 44: 767-72
  • 11. Pasalega M, Mirea C, Vîlcea ID, Vasile I, Pleşea IE, Calotă F, et al. Parietal abdominal endometriosis following Cesarean section. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011; 52: 503-8.
  • 12. Zhang J, Liu X. Clinicopathological features of endometriosis in abdominal wall--clinical analysis of 151 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016; 43: 379-83.
  • 13. Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB, Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 616-20.
  • 14. Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, Ersöz F, Koç O, Deniz M, et al. Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature. J Surg Res 2010; 164: 77-81.
  • 15. Uzunçakmak C, Güldaş A, Ozçam H, Dinç K. Scar endometriosis: a case report of this uncommon entity and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2013: 386783.
  • 16. Francica G. Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar. World J Radiol 2012; 4: 135-40.
  • 17. Gajjar KB, Mahendru A, Khaled M. Caesarean scar endometriosis presenting as an acute abdomen: a case report and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 277: 167-9.
  • 18. Gökçe AH, Ozkan A, Gökçe FS. Endometriosis at the incision site after C-section procedure. Pam Med J 2020; 13: 369-72.
APA Gulaydin N (2022). The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . , 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
Chicago Gulaydin Nihat The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . (2022): 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
MLA Gulaydin Nihat The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . , 2022, ss.131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
AMA Gulaydin N The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . . 2022; 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
Vancouver Gulaydin N The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . . 2022; 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
IEEE Gulaydin N "The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section ." , ss.131 - 134, 2022. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
ISNAD Gulaydin, Nihat. "The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section ". (2022), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
APA Gulaydin N (2022). The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . İstanbul Medical Journal, 23(2), 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
Chicago Gulaydin Nihat The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . İstanbul Medical Journal 23, no.2 (2022): 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
MLA Gulaydin Nihat The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . İstanbul Medical Journal, vol.23, no.2, 2022, ss.131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
AMA Gulaydin N The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . İstanbul Medical Journal. 2022; 23(2): 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
Vancouver Gulaydin N The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section . İstanbul Medical Journal. 2022; 23(2): 131 - 134. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
IEEE Gulaydin N "The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section ." İstanbul Medical Journal, 23, ss.131 - 134, 2022. 10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220
ISNAD Gulaydin, Nihat. "The Effect of Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Safety on the Success of Treatment in Endometriomas after Cesarean Section ". İstanbul Medical Journal 23/2 (2022), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.4274/imj.galenos.2022.94220