Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 13 - 20 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928 İndeks Tarihi: 23-06-2022

The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization

Öz:
Objective: In recent years, the fusion of computed tomography (CT) and non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (non- EPI DWI) has been preferred in cholesteatoma localizations. This study aimed to investigate the role of CT and non-EPI DWI fusion imaging in cholesteatoma localizations. Methods: This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent chronic otitis media operation [mean age of 35.10±15.33 years (18-67 years), 64.1% female, and 35.9% male] and had preoperative high-resolution temporal bone CT and non-EPI DWI examinations. Images were sent to the Advantage Workstation VolumeShare 7 for fusion. These selected images were fused on the workstation and were manually corrected by the radiologist. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracies of fused images of CT and non-EPI DWI were evaluated according to anatomic cholesteatoma localizations based on surgical data. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracies of non-EPI DWI for detecting cholesteatomas were 97.14%, 75.00%, 97.14%, 75.00%, and 94.87%, respectively. Three true-negative, one false-positive, and one false-negative case were observed according to surgical results in detecting the presence of a cholesteatoma with non-EPI DWI. Moderate agreement was determined between the surgical and radiological results in detecting the presence of a cholesteatoma (k=0.721). Detecting the lesion of localization on the fused images compared to surgical found an almost perfect agreement in the mastoid antrum (k=0.948), strong agreement in the hypotympanum and mastoid cells (k=0.894), moderate agreement in the epitympanum (k=0.653), and weak agreement in those in the mesotympanum (k=0.540). Conclusions: The surgeons’ determinations are supported by the guidance of temporal CT and non-EPI DWI fused images. Therefore, preferring the fusion imaging technique could increase the quality of life by reducing unnecessary operations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Kolesteatomun Cerrahi Lokalizasyonunun Değerlendirilmesinde Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ve Difüzyon Ağırlıklı Non-eko-planar Görüntülemenin Füzyon Tekniğinin Rolü

Öz:
Amaç: Kolesteatom lokalizasyonunda bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ile difüzyon ağırlıklı non-eko-planar manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (nEDAG) füzyonu son yıllarda tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, kolesteatom lokalizasyonunda BT ve nEDAG ile füzyon görüntülemenin rolünü araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya, ameliyat öncesi yüksek çözünürlüklü temporal kemik BT ve nEDAG tetkikleri olan 39 kronik otitis media hastası [ortalama yaş 35,10±15,33 yıl (18-67 yıl), %64,1 kadın, %35,9 erkek] dahil edildi. Görüntüler, füzyon için Advantage Workstation VolumeShare 7’ye gönderildi. Seçilen bu görüntüler iş istasyonunda aynı düzlemlerde birleştirildi ve radyolog tarafından manuel olarak düzeltildi. BT ve nEDAG birleştirilmiş görüntülerle kolesteatom varlığı ve anatomik lokalizasyonlarının duyarlılık, özgüllük, pozitif ve negatif prediktif değerleri ve tanısal doğrulukları, cerrahi verilere dayalı olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kolesteatomları saptamada nEDAG’nin duyarlılığı, özgüllüğü, pozitif ve negatif prediktif değerleri ve tanısal doğrulukları sırasıyla %97,14, %75,00, %97,14, %75,00 ve %94,87 idi. nEDAG ile kolesteatom varlığının saptanmasında cerrahi sonuçlara göre üç gerçek negatif, bir yanlış pozitif ve bir yanlış negatif olgu gözlendi. Kolesteatom varlığının saptanmasında cerrahi ve radyolojik sonuçlar arasında önemli bir uyum vardı (k=0,721). Birleştirilmiş görüntülerde, lezyonların lokalizasyonu cerrahi sonuçlarla karşılaştırıldığında, mastoid antrumda mükemmel (k=0,948), mastoid hücrelerde ve hipotimpanumda güçlü (k=0,894), epitimpanumda orta (k=0,653) düzeyde bir uyum varken, mezotimpanumdakilerde zayıf düzeyde uyum vardı (k=0,540). Sonuçlar: Cerrahların saptamaları, temporal BT ve nEDAG’nin birleştirilmiş görüntülerinin rehberliğinde desteklenmektedir. Bu nedenle füzyon görüntüleme tekniğinin tercih edilmesi, gereksiz operasyonları azaltarak yaşam kalitesini artırabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Stangerup SE, Drozdziewics D, Tos M, et al. Surgery for acquired cholesteatoma in children: long-term results and recurrence of cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112:742-9.
  • 2. Kerckhoffs KGP, Kommer MBJ, van Strien THL, et al. The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up or canal wall down technique in adults. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:980-7.
  • 3. Kim GW, Jung HK, Sung JM, et al. A tiny retraction of the pars flaccida may conceal an attic cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277:735-41.
  • 4. Matsuzawa S, Iino Y, Yamamoto D, et al. Attic cholesteatoma with closure of the entrance to pars flaccida retraction pocket. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44:766-70.
  • 5. Campos A, Mata F, Reboll R, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274:1405-11.
  • 6. Khemani S, Singh A, Lingam RK, et al. Imaging of postoperative middle ear cholesteatoma. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:760-7.
  • 7. Bennett M, Wanna G, Francis D, et al. Clinical and cost utility of an intraoperative endoscopic second look in cholesteatoma surgery. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:2867-71.
  • 8. Lingam RK, Bassett P. A Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Performance of Non-Echoplanar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: 10 Years On. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38:521-8.
  • 9. Khemani S, Lingam RK, Kalan A, et al. The value of non-echo planar HASTE diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection, localisation and prediction of extent of postoperative cholesteatoma. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36:306-12.
  • 10. Majithia A, Lingam RK, Nash R, et al. Staging primary middle ear cholesteatoma with non-echoplanar (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo-spin-echo) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging helps plan surgery in 22 patients: our experience. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012;37:325-30.
  • 11. Plouin-Gaudon I, Bossard D, Ayari-Khalfallah S, et al. Fusion of MRIs and CT scans for surgical treatment of cholesteatoma of the middle ear in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:878-83.
  • 12. Locketz GD, Li PM, Fischbein NJ, et al. Fusion of Computed Tomography and PROPELLER Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection and Localization of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:947-53.
  • 13. Sharma SD, Hall A, Bartley AC, et al. Surgical mapping of middle ear cholesteatoma with fusion of computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images: diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;129:109788.
  • 14. Lingam RK, Nash R, Majithia A, et al. Non-echoplanar diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma: navigating beyond the pitfalls to find the pearl. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:669-78.
  • 15. von Kalle T, Amrhein P, Koitschev A. Non-echoplanar diffusion- weighted MRI in children and adolescents with cholesteatoma: reliability and pitfalls in comparison to middle ear surgery. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45:1031-8.
  • 16. Nash R, Wong PY, Kalan A, et al. Comparing diffusion weighted MRI in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma in children and adults. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:2281- 5.
  • 17. Lingam RK, Khatri P, Hughes J, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients for detection of postoperative middle ear cholesteatoma on non- echo-planar diffusion-weighted images. Radiology. 2013;269:504- 10.
  • 18. Thiriat S, Riehm S, Kremer S, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of middle ear cholesteatoma differ from abscess and cholesteatoma admixed infection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1123-6.
  • 19. Yamashita K, Hiwatashi A, Togao O, et al. High-resolution three- dimensional diffusion-weighted MRI/CT image data fusion for cholesteatoma surgical planning: a feasibility study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:3821-4.
APA BALIK A, SENELDIR L, Verim A, Zer Toros S (2022). The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. , 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
Chicago BALIK AYŞE ÖZLEM,SENELDIR LUTFU,Verim Ayşegül,Zer Toros Sema The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. (2022): 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
MLA BALIK AYŞE ÖZLEM,SENELDIR LUTFU,Verim Ayşegül,Zer Toros Sema The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. , 2022, ss.13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
AMA BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. . 2022; 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
Vancouver BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. . 2022; 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
IEEE BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S "The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization." , ss.13 - 20, 2022. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
ISNAD BALIK, AYŞE ÖZLEM vd. "The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization". (2022), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
APA BALIK A, SENELDIR L, Verim A, Zer Toros S (2022). The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. Medeniyet Medical Journal, 37(1), 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
Chicago BALIK AYŞE ÖZLEM,SENELDIR LUTFU,Verim Ayşegül,Zer Toros Sema The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. Medeniyet Medical Journal 37, no.1 (2022): 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
MLA BALIK AYŞE ÖZLEM,SENELDIR LUTFU,Verim Ayşegül,Zer Toros Sema The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. Medeniyet Medical Journal, vol.37, no.1, 2022, ss.13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
AMA BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. Medeniyet Medical Journal. 2022; 37(1): 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
Vancouver BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization. Medeniyet Medical Journal. 2022; 37(1): 13 - 20. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
IEEE BALIK A,SENELDIR L,Verim A,Zer Toros S "The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization." Medeniyet Medical Journal, 37, ss.13 - 20, 2022. 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928
ISNAD BALIK, AYŞE ÖZLEM vd. "The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization". Medeniyet Medical Journal 37/1 (2022), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2022.28928