Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 45 - 49 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications

Öz:
Amaç: İnmeli hastalarda rehabilitasyona geç başlanmasının fonksiyonel sonuçlar ve tıbbi komplikasyonlar üzerine etkisini belirlemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: İlk tek taraflı inme atağını takiben rehabilitasyon kliniğine başvuran 60 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların tıbbi dosyaları incelendi. Hastalar, inme olayı ile rehabilitasyona başvuru süresi arasında geçen süreye göre, erken başvuru (<30 gün) ve geç başvuru (>30 gün) grubu olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. İki grup arasındaki demografik ve klinik özellikler, rehabilitasyon sonuçları ve tıbbi komplikasyonlar arasındaki farklar incelendi. Bulgular: Rehabilitasyonuna inmeden sonraki 1 ay içinde başlanan hastalarda, 1 aydan geç başlanan hastalara göre Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeğinde daha fazla artış gözlendi. (12,65±5,59 ve 8,59±5,50, p=0,008). Geç başvuran hastalarda görülen tıbbi komplikasyon sayısı erken başvuran hastalardan daha fazla idi (3,16±1,36 ve 1,91±1,12, p=0,001). Omuz ağrısı ve spastik üst ekstremite, rehabilitasyonu geciken hastalarda daha fazla bulundu (p=0,01 ve p=0,01). Sonuç: İnmeli hastalarda rehabilitasyonun gecikmesi fonksiyonel sonuçları olumsuz etkilemekte ve tıbbi komplikasyonların artmasına neden olmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Tıbbi kayıtlar Komplikasyonlar Rehabilitasyon Zaman Sonuç değerlendirilmesi (Sağlık bakımı) Geriyedönük çalışma İnme

Konular: Rehabilitasyon

İnme rehabilitasyonundaki gecikmenin fonksiyonel sonuçlar ve tıbbi komplikasyonlar üzerine etkisi

Öz:
Objective: To examine the effects of delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications in stroke patients.Materials and Methods: The inpatient discharge records of 60 stroke patients who admitted to a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department for first ever unilateral stroke patients were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups as early (<30 days) and delayed admission group (>30 days) based on the length of time from stroke event to admission to the rehabilitation unit. Potential differences between early and delayed admission groups were examined in terms of demographic and clinical features, rehabilitation outcomes and medical complications. Results: The patients beginning rehabilitation in the first month following stroke had a better Functional Independent Measurement Scores gain than the patients beginning rehabilitation longer than one month (12.65±5.59 vs. 8.59±5.50, p=0.008). The number of complications was higher in the delayed admission group than the early admission group (3.16±1.36 vs. 1.91±1.12, p=0.001). Shoulder pain and spastic upper limb was detected more frequently in patients with delayed group (p=0.01 and p=0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Delayed admission time to rehabilitation caused poorer functional outcomes, increased number of medical complications in stroke patients.
Anahtar Kelime: Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Retrospective Studies Stroke Medical Records Complications Rehabilitation Time

Konular: Rehabilitasyon
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Suputtitada A, Aksaranugraha S, Granger CV, Sankaew M. Results of stroke rehabilitation in Thailand. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1140-5.
  • 2. Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y, Takada M, Katoh J, Iwahashi M, et al. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:513-8.
  • 3. Gökkaya N, Aras MD, Cardenas D, Kaya A. Stroke rehabilitation outcome: the Turkish experience. Int J Rehabil Research 2006;29:105-11.
  • 4. Tur BS, Gürsel YK, Yavuzer G, Küçükdeveci A, Arasıl T. Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting. Int J Rehabil Research 2003;26:271-7.
  • 5. Inouye M, Hashimoto H, Mio T, Sumino K. Influence of admission functional status on functional change after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:121-5.
  • 6. Sze K-H, Wong E, Or KH, Lum CM, Woo J. Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:876-80.
  • 7. Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N et al. Impact of early vs. delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006;38:113-7.
  • 8. Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:S34-S40.
  • 9. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso GM, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:695-700.
  • 10. Musicco M, Emberti L, Nappi G, Caltagirone C. Early and long-term outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:551-8.
  • 11. Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, MacDonald J, Jones L, McAlpine C, et al. Medical complications after stroke. A multicenter study. Stroke 2000;31:1223-9.
  • 12. Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Diaz S. Incidence of risk factors for medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2001;32:523-9.
  • 13. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP. Complications after acute stroke. Stroke 1996;27:415-20.
  • 14. Dromerick A, Reding M. Medical and neurological complications during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1994;25:358-61.
  • 15. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The stroke data bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke 1988;19:547-54.
  • 16. Mayer NH, Esquenazi A, Childers MK. Common patterns of clinical motor dysfunction. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1997;6:S21-35.
  • 17. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant BA. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehab 2001;15:311-9.
  • 18. Sawner K, Lavigne J. Brunnstrom’s movement therapy in hemiplegia. A neurophysiological approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincot & Co. 1992.
  • 19. Akhan G, Kutluhan S, Eren N, Koyuncuoğlu HR, Demirci S. Isparta ili inme insidansı. Türk Nörol Derg 1999;2:108-14.
  • 20. Yavuzer G, Küçükdeveci A, Arasıl T, Elhan A. Rehabilitation of stroke patients. Clinical profile and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:250-5.
  • 21. Carod-Artal FJ, Medeiros MSM, Horan TA, Braga LW. Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury 2005;19:667-73.
  • 22. Deutsch A, Fiedler RC, Iwanenko W, Granger CV, Russell CF. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report: patients discharged from subacute rehabilitation programs in 1999. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;82:703-11.
  • 23. Franceschini M, Aliboni S, Rizzi B, Agosti M. Stroke rehabilitation pathways and procedures in Italy. Eur Med Phys 2004;40:251-6.
  • 24. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:281-99.
  • 25. Duncan PW, Lai SM. Stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;4:51-8.
  • 26. Kelley-Hayes M, Wolf P, Kase CS, Gresham GE, Kannel WB, D’Agostino RB. Time course of functional recovery after stroke: the Framingham study. J Neurol Rehabil 1989;3:65-70.
  • 27. Gilman S. Time course and outcome of recovery from stroke: relevance to stem cell treatment. Exp Neurol 2006;199:37-41.
  • 28. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;406-12.
  • 29. Dobkin B. Neuromedical complications in stroke patients transferred for rehabilitation before and after diagnostic related groups. J Neuro Rehabil 1987;1:3-7.
  • 30. Aras M, Gökkaya NKO, Cömert D, Kaya A, Çakci A. Shoulder pain in hemiplegia: results from a national rehabilitation hospital in Turkey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83;713-19.
  • 31. Pizzi A, Carlucci G, Falsini C, Verdesca S, Grippo A. Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiological study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:410-15.
APA SAVAŞ S, AKKUŞ S, SOYUPEK F, İLGÜN E, YILDIZ S (2007). Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. , 45 - 49.
Chicago SAVAŞ Serpil,AKKUŞ Selami,SOYUPEK Feray Cinevre,İLGÜN Erdem,YILDIZ Sedat Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. (2007): 45 - 49.
MLA SAVAŞ Serpil,AKKUŞ Selami,SOYUPEK Feray Cinevre,İLGÜN Erdem,YILDIZ Sedat Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. , 2007, ss.45 - 49.
AMA SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. . 2007; 45 - 49.
Vancouver SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. . 2007; 45 - 49.
IEEE SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S "Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications." , ss.45 - 49, 2007.
ISNAD SAVAŞ, Serpil vd. "Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications". (2007), 45-49.
APA SAVAŞ S, AKKUŞ S, SOYUPEK F, İLGÜN E, YILDIZ S (2007). Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 53(2), 45 - 49.
Chicago SAVAŞ Serpil,AKKUŞ Selami,SOYUPEK Feray Cinevre,İLGÜN Erdem,YILDIZ Sedat Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 53, no.2 (2007): 45 - 49.
MLA SAVAŞ Serpil,AKKUŞ Selami,SOYUPEK Feray Cinevre,İLGÜN Erdem,YILDIZ Sedat Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol.53, no.2, 2007, ss.45 - 49.
AMA SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2007; 53(2): 45 - 49.
Vancouver SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2007; 53(2): 45 - 49.
IEEE SAVAŞ S,AKKUŞ S,SOYUPEK F,İLGÜN E,YILDIZ S "Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications." Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 53, ss.45 - 49, 2007.
ISNAD SAVAŞ, Serpil vd. "Impact delayed initiation to stroke rehabilitation on functional outcomes and medical complications". Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 53/2 (2007), 45-49.