Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey

Dayıoğlu, Hayri; BARINOVA, Sophia; Solak, Cüneyt Nadir; ACS, Eva

Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey

Cüneyd Nadir SOLAK, (Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Kütahya, Türkiye)

Sophia BARINOVA, (The Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, the Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel)

Eva ACS, (Danube Research Institute of Hungarian Academy of Sciience, 2131 Göd, Javorka S. u. 14, Hungary)

Hayri DAYIOĞLU (Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Kütahya, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Botany

3 0

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 191 - 203 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey

Öz:

Diyatomeler, sucul ekosistemlerin önemli bir grubudur. Diyatomelerin biyolojik izleme çalışmalarında kullanımı Türkiye için yenidir. Bu çalışmada, Felent çayı boyunca 5 istasyondan Haziran 2006 ve Şubat 2007 tarihleri arasında toplanan 41 epilitik diyatome örneği incelenmiş ve toplam 117 takson tespit edilmiştir. Felent çayındaki çevresel şartlar diyatomelere bağlı olarak incelenmiş ve organik kirlilik, Watanabe indeksine (81/117 takson, toplam türlerin % 69,2 si) göre üç grupta ele alınmıştır. Yine, Sládečék indeksi hesaplanmış ve indeks değeri 1,36 ile 2,08 arasında yani, oligo- ile betamesosaprobic arasında çıkmıştır. Sonuçta, zengin tür çeşitliliği görülebilir. Ayrıca, RPI (Nehir Kirlilik İndeksi) de hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçta, Felent çayı yaz döneminde alkali özellikte, orta seviyede sıcak, düşük tuzlu ve organik kirlilik yüküne maruz kalmaktadır. Tür çeşitliliği kış döneminde yaz dönemine oranla daha fazladır.

Anahtar Kelime: biyolojik indikatörler biyomonitor akarsular Türkiye diyatomlar biyoçeşitlilik su kirliliği mevsimsel değişimler Sakarya Nehri

Konular: Biyoloji

Felent çayı (Sakarya nehir havzası) diyatomelerinin çeşitliliği ve ekolojisi

Öz:

Diatoms are an important group of aquatic ecosystems. To date, there have been many important algological studies in different river basins in Turkey. However, the use of diatoms in biomonitoring (according to diatom indices, Watanabe’s or Van Dam’s systems) is relatively new in Turkey. In the present study, 41 samples of epilithic diatoms were collected from 5 stations along Felent creek between June 2006 and February 2007 and a total of 117 diatom taxa were identified. The bio-indication (autoecology and abundance scores in the communities) of Felent creek was investigated and, as a result, the organic pollution indicators of Watanabe’s classifi cation (81 species, 69.2%) constituted 3 groups. The Sládečék’s index calculated for each sampling station varied from 1.36 to 2.08 (from oligo- to betamesosaprobic) at stations, and the river pollution index was calculated for each defined environmental variable as well as for species richness and index of saprobity over stations in summer and winter. The river water was alkaline and temperate with low salinity, and there was organic pollution in summer. Species richness was mostly higher in winter than in summer.

Anahtar Kelime: Turkey diatoms biodiversity water pollution seasonal variation Sakarya River biological indicators biomonitors streams

Konular: Biyoloji

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Akbulut A & Dügel M (2008). Planktonic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables in lakes of Salt Lake Basin (Central Anatolia-Turkey). Fresenius Environ Bull 17: 154-164.
Almeida SFP (2001). Use of diatoms for freshwater quality evaluation in Portugal. Limnetica 20: 205-213.
Atazadeh I, Sharifi M & Kelly MG (2007). Evaluation of the Trophic Diatom Index for assessing water quality in River Gharasou, Western Iran. Hydrobiologia 589: 165-173.
Atıcı T (1997). Pollution of Sakarya river and algae. Ekoloji 24: 28-32.
Atıcı T, Obalı O, Akköz C & Elmacı A (2001). Isolation and identifi cation of halophytic algae from salty soil around Salt Lake of Turkey. Pakistan J Biol Sci 4: 298-300.
Atıcı T & Ahıska S (2005). Pollution and algae of Ankara Stream. Gazi Üniv Fen Bil Derg 18: 51-59.
Atıcı T & Obalı O (2010). The diatoms of Asartepe Dam Lake (Ankara), with environmental and some physicochemical properties. Turk J Bot 34: 541-548.
Atıcı T & Yıldız K (1996). Sakarya Nehri diyatomeleri. Turk J Bot 20: 119-134.
Ács É, Szabó K, Tóth B & Kiss KT (2004). Investıgatıon of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Botanica Hungarica 46: 255-277.
Barinova SS, Tavassi M & Nevo E (2006a). Algal indicator system of environmental variables in the Hadera River basin, central Israel. Plant Biosystems 140: 65-79.
Barinova SS, Medvedeva LA & Anissimova OV (2006b). Diversity of algal indicators in environmental assessment. Pilies Studio, Tel Aviv (in Russian).
Barinova SS, Tavassi M & Nevo E (2010). Algal communities of the Hadera River (Israel) under dramatic niche changes. Cent Eur J Biol 5: 507-521.
Barinova SS, Kukhaleishvili L, Nevo E & Janelidze Z (2011). Diversity and ecology of algae in the Algeti National Park as a part of the Georgian system of protected areas. Turk J Bot 33: doi:10.3906/ bot-1009-83.
Baykal T, Akbulut A, Açikgöz I, Udoh AU, Yıldız K & Şen B (2009). New records for the freshwater algae of Turkey. Turk J Bot 33: 141-152.
Bingöl N, Özyurt S, Dayioğlu H, Yamık A & Solak CN (2007). Yukarı Porsuk Çayı (Kütahya) epilitik diyatomeleri. Ekoloji 62: 23-29.
Blanco S, Bécares A, Cauchie H-M, Hoff mann L & Ector L (2007). Comparison of biotic indices for water quality diagnosis in the Duero Basin (Spain). Arch Hydrobiol (suppl. Large Rivers) 17: 267-286.
Blanco S, Ector L, Huck V, Monnier O, Cauchie H-M, Hoff mann L & Bécares A (2008). Diatom assemblages and water quality assessment in the Duero Basin (NW Spain). Belg J Bot 141: 39- 50.
Bona F, Falasco E, Fassina S, Griselli B & Badino G (2007). Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia 583: 265-274.
Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı (2004). Türkiye Çevre Atlası. – T. C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Çevre Envanteri Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara.
Dell’Uomo A & Torrisi M (2009). Freshwater algae and their usefulness in safeguarding the Mediterranean basin. Bocconea 23: 5-17.
Ector L & Rimet F (2005). Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: An overview. In: Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot P, Descy J-P & Park YS (eds), Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems, pp. 7-19, Berlin: Springer Press.
Fieo MJ, Almeida SFP, Craveiro SC & Calado AJ (2009). A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic Diatom communities. Ecol Indic 9: 497-507.
Gezerler-Sipal U, Aysel V & Güner H (1994). Bandırma Kusgölü’ne dökülen Sıgırcı Dere’nin alg florası ve çevresinin kirlenmesindeki etkileri. Ege Üniv Fen Fak Derg 16: 351-356.
Guiry MD & Guiry GM (2009). AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Website: http://www.algaebase.org, [accessed December 2009].
Korde NV (1956). The methods of biological studies for the bottom deposits of lakes (the field methods of biological analysis). Moscow, Leningrad: Nauka Press (in Russian).
Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-1, Stuttgart.
Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1988) Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariophyceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-2, Stuttgart.
Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991a) Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-3, Stuttgart.
Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991b) Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnantheceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lincolatae) und Gomphonema. Cesamptliteraturverzeichnis . Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-4, Stuttgart.
Ongun-Sevindik T, Çelik K & Gönülol A (2010). Twenty-four new records for the freshwater algae of Turkey. Turk J Bot 34: 249- 259.
Pantle E & Buck H (1955). Die biologische Uberwachung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas- und Wasserfach 96: 1-604.
Resende PC, Resende P, Pardal M, Almeida S & Azeiteiro U (2009). Use of biological indicators to assess water quality of the Ul River (Portugal). Environ Monit Assess 170: 535-544.
Romanenko VD, Oksijuk OP, Zhukinsky VN, Stolberg FV & Lavrik VI (1990). Ecological impact assessment of hydrotechnical constructions on water bodies. Kijev: Naukova Dumka (in Russian).
Sládeček V (1973). System of water quality from the biological point of view. Ergebnisse der Limnologie 7: 1-128.
Sladeček V (1986). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution, Acta Hydroch Hydrob 14: 555-566.
Solak CN (2011). The application of diatom indices in the Upper Porsuk River, Kütahya-Turkey. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 11: 31-36.
Solak CN, Ector L, Wojtal A, Ács É & Morales E (2012). A review of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft e 141: 431-462.
Squires LE & Saoud NS (1986). Effects of water quality and season on diatom community structure in the Damour River, Lebanon. Hydrobiologia 133: 127-141.
Sumita M (1986). A numerical water quality assessment of rivers in Hokuriku District using epilithic diatom assemblage in riverbed as a biological indicator. (II) The values of RPId in surveyed rivers. Japan Journal of Diatomology 2: 9-18.
Swift E (1967). Cleaning diatom frustules with ultraviolet radiation and peroxide. Phycologia 6: 161-163.
Tavassi M, Barinova SS, Anissimova OV, Nevo E & Wasser SP (2004). Algal indicators of environment in the Nahal (River) Yarqon basin, central Israel. International Journal of Algae 6: 355-382.
Tavassi M, Barinova SS & Nevo E (2008). Examination of water quality from the Yarqon River (Central Israel) using the glass slide method to defi ne algal vegetative activity (in vitro). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 6: 113-125.
ter Braak CJF (1987). The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
ter Braak CJF (1990). Interpreting canonical correlation analysis through biplots of structural correlations and weights. Psychometrica 55: 519-531.
Urrea G & Sabater S (2009). Epilithic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental characteristics in an agricultural watershed (Guadiana River, SW Spain). Ecol Indic 9: 693-703.
Van Dam H, Mertens A & Sinkeldam S (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117- 133.
Watanabe T, Asai K & Houki A (1986). Numerical estimation to organic pollution of fl owing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage-Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). Science Total Environment 55: 209-218.
Whitton BA, Rott E & Friedrich G (1991). Use of algae for monitoring rivers. Innsbruck: Institut für Botanik University Press.
Yıldız K (1987). Diatoms of the Porsuk River, Turkey. Turk J Biol 11: 162-182.
Yıldız K & Atıcı T (1996). Ankara Çayı diyatomeleri. Gazi Üniv Fen Edebiyat Fak Derg 6: 59-87.
Yıldız K & Özkıran Ö (1994). Çubuk Çayı diyatomları. Turk J Biol 18: 313-329.
Ziller S & Montesanto B (2004). Phytobenthos (diatoms) and water framework directive implementation: The case of two Mediterranean rivers in Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull 13: 128-138.

APA	Solak C, BARINOVA S, ACS E, Dayıoğlu H (2012). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. , 191 - 203.
Chicago	Solak Cüneyt Nadir,BARINOVA Sophia,ACS Eva,Dayıoğlu Hayri Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. (2012): 191 - 203.
MLA	Solak Cüneyt Nadir,BARINOVA Sophia,ACS Eva,Dayıoğlu Hayri Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. , 2012, ss.191 - 203.
AMA	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. . 2012; 191 - 203.
Vancouver	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. . 2012; 191 - 203.
IEEE	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H "Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey." , ss.191 - 203, 2012.
ISNAD	Solak, Cüneyt Nadir vd. "Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey". (2012), 191-203.

APA	Solak C, BARINOVA S, ACS E, Dayıoğlu H (2012). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 36(2), 191 - 203.
Chicago	Solak Cüneyt Nadir,BARINOVA Sophia,ACS Eva,Dayıoğlu Hayri Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 36, no.2 (2012): 191 - 203.
MLA	Solak Cüneyt Nadir,BARINOVA Sophia,ACS Eva,Dayıoğlu Hayri Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, vol.36, no.2, 2012, ss.191 - 203.
AMA	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2012; 36(2): 191 - 203.
Vancouver	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2012; 36(2): 191 - 203.
IEEE	Solak C,BARINOVA S,ACS E,Dayıoğlu H "Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey." Turkish Journal of Botany, 36, ss.191 - 203, 2012.
ISNAD	Solak, Cüneyt Nadir vd. "Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey". Turkish Journal of Botany 36/2 (2012), 191-203.