Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty

Serkan ÇELİK (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
3 0
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 141 - 163 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty

Öz:
Web’e dayalı teknolojiler, çevrimiçi öğrenme ve mesleki gelişim alanında yenilikler, teknolojinin öğretmen yetiştirme sürecindeki önemini arttırmıştır. Bu çalışma, altı farklı üniversite bünyesindeki Eğitim fakültelerinde görev yapan 124 öğretim elemanının teknolojiden öğrenme ve öğretme amaçlı yararlanma düzeylerini belirlemeyi, konuyla ilgili hali hazırdaki uygulamalarını ortaya çıkarmayı ve alanyazında değinilen teknolojinin yayılmasına dönük modelleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, altı farklı üniversitede görev yapan öğretim elemanlarından, teknolojinin eğitim ortamlarına uyarlanma düzeylerini ortaya koyma amaçlı hazırlanmış olan bir anket aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, katılımcı akademisyenlerin çalışma ortamlarına teknolojinin güncel yönelimlerini yeterli ölçüde yansıtmaları önünde çeşitli engeller bulunduğunu ve dolayısıyla öğretmen yetiştiricilerin teknolojiden mesleki anlamda yararlanmada sınırlıkları bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, ayrıca, teknolojik unsurlarla güçlendirilmiş güncel öğrenme modellerinin katılımcıların mesleki ortamlarında yeterince kullanılmadığına işaret etmektedir. Bulgular, ilgili alanyazın doğrultusunda tartışılmış ve çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: teknoloji destekli öğrenme öğretmen eğitimi teknoloji yayılım modelleri teknoloji kullanımı

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Eğitim fakültesi öğretim elemanlarının teknoloji uyarlama düzeyleri

Öz:
As a consequence of the recent progressions in web-based technologies, online learning, and professional development, technology has taken responsibility of a leading role in teacher education. This study aimed to portray technology diffusion models through the literature and purport technology integration levels and technology related instructional practices of teacher education faculty in a group of Turkish universities. Data gathered through a technology implementation survey from academics employed at education faculties at six different Turkish universities. The results of the study revealed that participated academics have exposed to some hindrances to implement the current technology into their educational settings and their perceived technology implementation levels are not promising. Consequences also pointed out that there is a shortage of imbedding contemporary learning models garnered with technologic facilities. Some further suggestions were made in accordance with the outcomes.
Anahtar Kelime: teacher education technology expansion models technology use technology-supported learning

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). A structural model proposal for Turkish faculties of education regarding ICT integration indicators. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(4), 322-334.
  • Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K–12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved at August 28, 2009 from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article2.cfm
  • Aşkar, P. & Usluel, Y.K. (2002). Teknolojinin yayılım sürecinde öğretmenler ve bilgisayarın özelliklerine ilişkin algıları. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 22, 14-20.
  • Becker, H. J. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. Retrieved at March 5, 2009 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/conferences-pdf/how_are_teachers_using.pdf
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Çağiltay,K., Çakiroglu, J., Çagiltay, N. & Çakiroglu, E. (2001). Öğretimde bilgisayar kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 19-28.
  • Çagiltay, K., Yildirim, S. (2007). Öğretim teknolojilerinin üniversitede kullanımına yönelik alışkanlıklar ve beklentiler: Betimleyici bir çalışma, Akademik Bilişim, Kütahya. Retrieved at July 19, 2008 from http://ab.org.tr/ab07/sunum/115.pdf.
  • Çelik, H. C. & Bindak, R. (2005). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenlere gore incelenmesi, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 (10). 24-33.
  • Chuttur M.Y. (2009). "Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions," Indiana University, USA . Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37). Indiana University, USA. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/785/1/TAMReview.pdf on 25 August 2010.
  • Davis, F. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies”. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2007). Which Factors Obstruct or Stimulate Teacher Educators to Use ICT Innovatively? Journal of Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
  • Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. "Educational Technology," 39(6), 23-27. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 595 513).
  • Fullan, M., with Steigelbauer, S. (l991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Goktas, Y., Yildirim, Z. & Yildirim, S. (2008). The Keys for ICT Integration in K-12: Teachers Perceptions and Usage. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 127-139.
  • Gökdaş, İ. & Kayri, M. (2005). E-öğrenme ve Türkiye açısından sorunlar, çözüm önerileri, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Elektronik Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:II, Sayı: II. Retrieved at August 4, 2007 from http://efdergi.yyu.edu.tr.
  • Grabe, M. & Grabe, C. (2001). Integrating technology for meaningful learning,3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.
  • Granston, C. N. (2004).Technology and teacher training the systematic design and development of a framework for integrating technology into Jamaica's teacher training programs. Unpublished Dissertation Thesis. University of South Florida, USA.
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2008). ICT usage in higher education: A case study on pre-service teachers and instructors. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 32-37.
  • Jonassen, D.H., & Reeves, T.C. (1996). Learning with Technology: Using Computers as cognitive tools. In D.H Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 693-719). New York.: Simon and Schuster.
  • Kirkup, G. & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching – a tale of Gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol: 30(2), 185-199.
  • Koehler, M. & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Retrieved at July 15, 2008 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=12516
  • Koehler, M. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York City, NY. Retrieved on July 19, 2008 from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/2008/03/11/tpack-aera-new-york/
  • Koehler, M., J. & Mishra, P. (2009) What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Eduaction, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Kortecamp, K. & Croninger, W. R. (1996). Addressing Barriers to Technology Diffusion. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5 (1/2), 71-82.
  • Kozma, R. & Anderson, R. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 387-394.
  • Ma, W.W., Anderson, R. & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol: 21. 387-395.
  • McKenzie, B. K., Elizabeth, K., & Nancy, G. M. (1996). Preparing for the future with technology: extending past the classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 5(1), 83-92.
  • Means, B. (1994). Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 1-22). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Moersch, C. (1994). Levels of Technology Implementation. Retrieved at February 17, 2010 from http://www.learning-quest.com/LoTi/lotihome.html
  • Moursund, D. & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age: A national survey on information technology in teacher education? Evaluation Study by the International Society for Technology in Education. commissioned by Milken Exchange on Education Technology, Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  • Office of Technology Assessment, (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Retrieved at November 13, 2010 from http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/ns20/alpha_f.html.
  • Plomp, T., Ten Brummelhuis, A., & Rapmund, R. (1996). Teaching and Learning for the Future (Report of the Committee on Multimedia in Teacher Training (COMMITT)) to the Netherlands Minister of Education). Sdu, The Hague.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (2 ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed). New York: The Free Press.
  • Richardson, J. (2000). ICT Implementation in Education: an Analysis of Implementation Strategies in Australia, Canada, Finland and Israel. Ministry of Education, Luxembourg.
  • Sadi, S., Sekerci, A. R., Kurban, B., Topu, F. B., Demirel, T. Tosun, C., Demirci, T & Goktas, Y. (2008). Ögretmen Egitiminde Teknolojinin Etkin Kullanımı: Ögretim Elemanları ve Ögretmen Adaylarının Görüsleri. Bilisim Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt: 1, Sayi: 3, 43-49.
  • Schmidt, D. (1998). Technology and teacher education: pre-service teachers can help make a difference. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14(2), 2-3.
  • Surry, D.W. & Farquhar, J.D. (1997) Diffusion theory and instructional technology. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (2) 1. Online: http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/ vol2no1/article2.htm
  • Surry, D. W. & Land, S. M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(2), 145-153.
  • Surry, D.W., Robinson, M.A., & Marcinkiewics, H. (2001). A model for integrating instructional technology into colleges of education. In Proceedings of the Design: Connect, Create, Collaborate Conference. (pp. 7-14). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. [Online]. Retrieved at June 23, 2010 from http://it.coe.uga.edu/designconference/proceedings.html
  • Usluel-Koçak,Y. , Aşkar, P., & Baş, T. (2008) . A structural equation model for ICT usage in higher education. Educational Technology & Society,11 (2), 262-273.
  • U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000).Teachers’ tools for the 21st Century: A Report on teachers’ use of technology. NECS. Washington, DC.
  • Van Den Berg, R., Vandenberghe, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). Management of innovations from a culturelindividual perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(3), 321-351.
  • Webber, C. F. (2003). New technologies and educative leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 119-123.
APA celik s (2011). Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. , 141 - 163.
Chicago celik serkan Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. (2011): 141 - 163.
MLA celik serkan Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. , 2011, ss.141 - 163.
AMA celik s Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. . 2011; 141 - 163.
Vancouver celik s Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. . 2011; 141 - 163.
IEEE celik s "Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty." , ss.141 - 163, 2011.
ISNAD celik, serkan. "Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty". (2011), 141-163.
APA celik s (2011). Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 141 - 163.
Chicago celik serkan Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 44, no.2 (2011): 141 - 163.
MLA celik serkan Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.44, no.2, 2011, ss.141 - 163.
AMA celik s Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 44(2): 141 - 163.
Vancouver celik s Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 44(2): 141 - 163.
IEEE celik s "Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty." Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, ss.141 - 163, 2011.
ISNAD celik, serkan. "Technology integration levels of teacher education faculty". Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 44/2 (2011), 141-163.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 13:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları