Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 166 Sayfa Aralığı: 129 - 140 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Avrupa Dil Gelişim Dosyası (ADGD) kullanımı dikkate alındığında ergenlerin özerklik algılarının farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını ve ADGD kullanımı ve özerklik gelişimlerinin İngilizce başarıları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Ayrıca, ADGD’nin ve özerklik geliştirmeye yönelik stratejilerin nasıl kullanıldığı mercek altına alınmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları Ankara ve Adana’da iki özel ilköğretim okulundaki erken ergenlik döneminde olan 309 6-8. Sınıf öğrencisi ve 11 öğretmendir. ‘Aşamalı açıklayıcı’ araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar ADGD kullanmayan öğrencilerin ‘Ergen Özerklik Ölçeği’ ve ‘Dil Öğrenme Özerklik Ölçeği’ puanlarının ADGD kullanan öğrencilerden daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. ‘Dil Öğrenme Özerklik Ölçeği’ puanları İngilizce başarısının anlamlı yordayıcısıdır. Ayrıca, ADGD kullanımının özerk öğrenme stratejileriyle desteklenmediği anlaşılmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Türk ergenlerde özerklik ve avrupa dil gelişim dosyası kullanımı

Öz:
This study aims to investigate the difference between perceptions among adolescents towards autonomy considering the European Language Portfolio Use (ELPU) and the effects of autonomy and ELPU on English attainment. It further scrutinizes how European Language Portfolios (ELP) and autonomy promoting strategies are used. The participants comprised 309 6th-8th year students in their early adolescence and 11 teachers in two private primary schools in Ankara and Adana. A ‘sequential explanatory’ research design was applied. Results revealed that the students who did not use ELP scored higher on the ‘Adolescent Autonomy Scale’ and ‘Language Learning Autonomy Scale (LLAS)’ than those who used ELPs. LLAS scores were the significant predictors of the English attainment. Furthermore, the ELPU was not supported with autonomy promoting strategies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Barber, B. K., &. Olsen J. A. (1997). Socialization in context: Connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighbourhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 287-315.
  • Beckert, T. E. (2005). Fostering autonomy in adolescents: a model of cognitive autonomy and selfevaluation. [Online] Retrieved on 12 January, 2010, at URL: http://aabss.org/journal2005/ AABSS%20Article%207%20FOSTERING%20AUTONOMY.pdf
  • Çakır, S. G., & Aydın, G. (2005). Parental attitudes and ego identity status of Turkish Adolescents. Adolescence, 40, 847-859.
  • Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G.R. Adams, & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Advances in adolescent development: Vol. 6. Personal relationships during adolescence. (pp. 7-36), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cook-Benjamin, L. (2001). Portfolio assessment: Benefits, issues of implementation, and reflections on its use.Assessment Update, 13, 6-7.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eccles, J. S., Early D., Frasier K., Belansky E., & McCarthy K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 263-286.
  • Holec, H., 1981: Autonomy and foreign language learning, Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 36(4), 403-422.
  • Kobak, R., & Cole, H. (1994). Attachment and meta-monitoring: Implications for adolescent autonomy and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & S.L. Toth (Eds.), Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology: Vol. 5: Disorders and dysfunctions of the self (pp.267- 297). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Lambin, D. V., & Walker, V. L. (1994). Planning for portfolio assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 318-324.
  • Little, D. (2000). We’re all in it together: Exploring the interdependence of teacher and learner autonomy. Proceeding of the 7th Nordic Conference and Workshop on Autonomous Language Learning, Helsinki, September 7th, 2000. Retrieved on 14 August, 2009, at URL: http://www.iatefl.org.pl/sig/al/all.html.
  • Little, D. (2002). The European Language Portfolio: structure, origins, implementation and challenges, Language Teaching 35(3), 182-9.
  • Little, D. (2005). The common European framework and the European language portfolio: Involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321-336.
  • Lynch, T. (2001). Promoting EAP learner autonomy in a second language university context. In J. Flowerdew, & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, (pp. 390-403), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mullin, J. A. (1998). Portfolios: Purposeful collections of student work. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 74, 79-87.
  • Noom, M. J., Dekovic M., & Meeus W. H. J. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771-783.
  • Noom, M. J., Dekovic M., & Meeus W. H. J. (2001). Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 577-595.
  • Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & C. A. Meyer (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Lynch, J. H. (1989) Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340-356.
  • Smith, J, Brewer, D. M., & Heffner, T. (2003). Using portfolio assessment with young children who are at risk for school failure. Preventing School Failure, 48, 38-40.
  • Spear, H. J., & Kulbok P., (2004). Autonomy and adolescence: A concept analysis. Public Health Nursing 21(2), 144 – 152.
  • Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851.
  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266-1281.
  • Sümer, N., & Güngör, D. (1999). Çocuk Yetiştirme Stillerinin Bağlanma Stilleri, Benlik Değerlendirmeleri ve Yakın İlişkiler Üzerindeki Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14, 35- 38.
  • Tunç, A., & Tezer, E. (2006). Çocuk Yetiştirme Stilleri ve Benlik Saygısı Arasındaki İlişki. Turkish Psychological Counselling and Guidance Journal, 3(25), 37-44.
  • Türkel, Y. D., & Tezer, E. (2008). Parenting styles and learned resourcefulness of Turkish adolescents Adolescence, 43(169), 144-152.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (Eds.) (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Yılmazer, Y. (2007). Anne-Baba Tutumları ile İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Okul Başarısı ve Özerkliklerinin Gelişimi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Youniss, J., & Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2001). Autonomy in adolescence. In J. V. Lerner & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Adolescence in America: An Encyclopedia. (pp. 79-83). Denver, CO: ABC CLIO.
  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Collins, W.A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G.R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175-204). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
APA SERT N, ADAMSON J, Büyüköztürk Ş (2012). Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. , 129 - 140.
Chicago SERT Nehir,ADAMSON John,Büyüköztürk Şener Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. (2012): 129 - 140.
MLA SERT Nehir,ADAMSON John,Büyüköztürk Şener Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. , 2012, ss.129 - 140.
AMA SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. . 2012; 129 - 140.
Vancouver SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. . 2012; 129 - 140.
IEEE SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş "Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents." , ss.129 - 140, 2012.
ISNAD SERT, Nehir vd. "Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents". (2012), 129-140.
APA SERT N, ADAMSON J, Büyüköztürk Ş (2012). Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(166), 129 - 140.
Chicago SERT Nehir,ADAMSON John,Büyüköztürk Şener Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. Eğitim ve Bilim 37, no.166 (2012): 129 - 140.
MLA SERT Nehir,ADAMSON John,Büyüköztürk Şener Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.37, no.166, 2012, ss.129 - 140.
AMA SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(166): 129 - 140.
Vancouver SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(166): 129 - 140.
IEEE SERT N,ADAMSON J,Büyüköztürk Ş "Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents." Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, ss.129 - 140, 2012.
ISNAD SERT, Nehir vd. "Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents". Eğitim ve Bilim 37/166 (2012), 129-140.