Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 23 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients

Öz:
OBJECTIVE: In this study we aim to discuss diagnostic and tratment modalities and prognostic factors of 150 patients that were admitted to our clinic between October 2002 and May 2009 in a retrospective way in regard with the current literature. STUDY DESIGN: Patients all demographic data were recorded upon admittance, diagnostic and treat- ment options that were perfomed were also recorded and thus are used in this study. RESULTS: Patients median age was 67.1±11 ,2 (52-79) , Trans vaginal ultrasonography (TVUSG) was used to measure endometrial thickness and the median was 15.7± 4.91 mm (6-36). All patients were di- agnosed with fractional curretage before admittance to the gynecological oncology clinic, all underwent total abdominal hysterectomy bilateral salpingoopherectomy and bilateral pelvic para aortic lym- phadenectomy (performed if FIGO critera are met). Surgical staging results were as follows; 78% Stage 1, 10% Stage 2, 8% Stage 3 and 4% were Stage 4. Histopathological differentiation resulted largely in favor of Endometrioid adenocarcinoma with 132 patients (88%), 6 cases of Serous papillary carcinoma (4%), 7 cases of Clear cell carcinoma (4.6%), 3 cases of Mucinous carcinoma (2%) and 2 cases of Undifferentiated carcinoma (1.3%). In terms of grading, 28 patients (18.6%) were classified as high grade and among 132 patients that were classified as endometrioid carcinoma 69 were grade I (52.2%), 52 were grade II (39.3%) and 11 were grade III (8.3). In terms of myometrial invasion beyond 50%, grade I patients were less likely to, with only 5.2%, and 39% and 76.3% for grades II and III respectively. Lymph node dissection was performed on 71 patients among which 8 had positive pelvic lymph nodes (5.3%) and 2 had positive aortic lymph nodes (1.3%). All high grade patients had positive peritoneal cytology. Lymphovascular space invasion was present in 36 of the patients (24%) of which 3 were grade I (8.3%), 12 were grade II (33.3%) and 11 were grade III (30.5%). Among 16 patients that had cervical invasion 14 also had lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (87.5%). CONLCLUSION: Survival in endometrial carcinoma depends on many factors starting with the FIGO staging, histological type of the tumour, its histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, treatment modalities and patient specific variables such as age, BMI, parity.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Atasü T, Şahmay S: Jinekoloji: 2. Bas kı Nobel Tıp Ki - tapevi 2001;299-314.
  • 2. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer sta- tistic; 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50:7-33.
  • 3. Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial car- cinoma. Gynecol Onco1 1983;15:10-7.
  • 4. Soliman PT, Oh JC, Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Slomowitz Bm, Gershenson DM, Burke TW, Lu KH. Risk factors for young premenopausal women with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:575-80.
  • 5. Xu WH, Xiang YB, Ruan ZX: Menstrual and reproductive factors and endometrial cancer risk: Results from a popu- lation-based case-control study in urban Shanghai. Int J Cancer 2004;10;108:613-9.
  • 6. Hinkula M, Pukkula E, Kyyronen P: Grand multiparity and incidence of endometrial cancer: a population-based study in Finland. Int J Cancer 2002;20;98:912-5.
  • 7. MacMahon B. Risk factors for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1974;2:122-9.
  • 8. Bakhidze EV, Chepik OF, Maksimov SI: Frequency of in- fertility in endometrial cancer. Vopr Onkol 2002;48:251-4.
  • 9. Sawicki W, Spiewankiewicz B, Stelmachow J: The value of ultrasonography in preoperative assesment of selected prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003;24:293-8.
  • 10. Gull B, Karlsson B, Milsom: Can ultrasound replace di- latation and curettage A longitudional evaluation of post- menopausal bleeding and transvaginal sonographic meas- urement of the endometrium as predictors of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:401-8.
  • 11. Ruangvutilert P, Sutantawibul A, Sunsaneevithayakul P, Boriboonhirunsarn D, Chuenchom T. Accuracy of vtrans- vaginal ultrasound fort he evaluation of myometrial inva- sion in endometrial carcinoma. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:47-52.
  • 12. Kose G,Aka N,Api M: Preoperative assessment of my- ometrial invasion and cervical involvement of endometrial cancer by transvaginal ultrasonography. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56:70-6.
  • 13. Dijkuizen FP, Mol BWJ, Brolmann Ham et al: The accu- racy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a metaanly- sis. Cancer 2000;89:1765-72.
  • 14. Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, Silverberg S, Lim PC, Burke JJ 2nd, Alberts D, Curtin J. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 2006;106:812-9.
  • 15. Valenzuela P, Sanz JM, Keller J: Atypical endometrial hy- perplasia: grounds for possible misdiagnosis of endome- trial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56: 163-7.
  • 16. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, et al: A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive exter- nal pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endome- trial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:744-51.
  • 17. Kadar N, Malfetano JH, Homesley HD. Determinants of survival of surgically staged patients with endometrial car- cinoma histologically confined to the uterus: Implications for therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:655-9.
  • 18. Hanson MB, van Nagell JR Jr, Powell DE, Donaldson E, Gallion H: Vascular space invasion in stage 1 endometrial cancer. Cancer 1985;55:1753-7.
  • 19. Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Relationship between surgi- cal- pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of endometrium:a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1991:40:55-65.
  • 20. Saygılı U, Kavaz S, Altınyurt S: Omentectomy, peritoneal biopsy and appendectomy in patient with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11:471-4.
  • 21. Hanf V, Gunthert AR, Emons G: Endometrial cancer. Onkologie 2003;26:429-36.
  • 22. Lapinska-Szumczyk S, Emerich J: Clinical value of pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. Ginekol Pol 2002;73:976-9.
  • 23. Labastida R, Dexeus S, Fabregas R: Endometrial cancer: factors affecting survival. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003;24: 381-3
APA Güven D, Bakay K, KOÇAK İ, ÜSTÜN C (2012). Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. , 21 - 23.
Chicago Güven Davut,Bakay Kadir,KOÇAK İdris,ÜSTÜN Cazip Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. (2012): 21 - 23.
MLA Güven Davut,Bakay Kadir,KOÇAK İdris,ÜSTÜN Cazip Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. , 2012, ss.21 - 23.
AMA Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. . 2012; 21 - 23.
Vancouver Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. . 2012; 21 - 23.
IEEE Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C "Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients." , ss.21 - 23, 2012.
ISNAD Güven, Davut vd. "Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients". (2012), 21-23.
APA Güven D, Bakay K, KOÇAK İ, ÜSTÜN C (2012). Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 18(1), 21 - 23.
Chicago Güven Davut,Bakay Kadir,KOÇAK İdris,ÜSTÜN Cazip Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine 18, no.1 (2012): 21 - 23.
MLA Güven Davut,Bakay Kadir,KOÇAK İdris,ÜSTÜN Cazip Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, vol.18, no.1, 2012, ss.21 - 23.
AMA Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine. 2012; 18(1): 21 - 23.
Vancouver Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine. 2012; 18(1): 21 - 23.
IEEE Güven D,Bakay K,KOÇAK İ,ÜSTÜN C "Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients." GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 18, ss.21 - 23, 2012.
ISNAD Güven, Davut vd. "Endometrial cancer - evaluation of diagnostics treatment and prognosis in 150 patients". GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine 18/1 (2012), 21-23.