Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 201 - 212 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish
Öz: Bu makalede, Türkçede düzelti söylem bağıntıları ele alınmaktadır. Çalışmanın veri kaynağını çağdaş yazılı Türkçeden örnekler taşıyan, ortalama 400.000 sözcüklük ODTÜ Türkçe Söylem Bankası oluşturmaktadır. Makalede, olumsuz ve olumlu iki tümceciğin yan yana olmasıyla Düzelti söylem bağıntısının belirsizliğe yol açmayacak bir biçimde anlaşıldığı tartışılmaktadır. Tersine ve bilakis gibi söylem bağlaçlarının düzelti anlamını taşıdığı ancak bu bağlaçların çok anlamlı oldukları, hem zıtlık hem de düzelti anlamı taşıdıkları söylenmektedir. Çalışmada Zıtlık söylem bağıntılarının Düzelti söylem bağlantılarının anlaşılmasına katkısı belirtilmekte, edimsel sezdirimlerin de düzelti anlamına katkı yaptığı gösterilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Türkçe de Düzelti Söylem Bağıntıları
Öz: This paper investigates the major characteristics of Corrective discourse relations in Turkish. The data source is METU Turkish Discourse Bank, a ~400,000-word corpus of contemporary written Turkish. The paper suggests that Corrective discourse relations are unambiguously inferred from the adjacency of a negative and a positive clause. Certain connectives like tersineon the contrary and bilakis far from it also express the corrective sense but they are polysemous, conveying both correction and contrast. The paper points out the role of Contrastive discourse relations in understanding corrective discourse and shows how pragmatic inferences function in interpreting corrections.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- Asher, N. (1993). Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Springer.
- Asher, N., and Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
- Demirşahin, I., Öztürel, A., Bozşahin, C., and Zeyrek, D. (2013). Applicative structures and immediate discourse in the Turkish Discourse Bank. Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse Aug. 8-9 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria.
- Fox, D., and Katzir, R. (2011). On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics, 19(1), 87-107.
- Horn, L. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, 11-42.
- Izutsu, M. N. (2008). Contrast, concessive, and correctiveToward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 646-675.
- Jasinskaja, K. (2010). Corrective contrast in Russian, in contrast. In Grønn, A., and Marijanovic, I. (Eds.), Russian in Contrast, Oslo Studies in Language 2(2), 433 466.
- Jasinskaja, K. (2012). Correction by adversative and additive markers. Lingua, 122 (15), 1899-1918.
- Jasinskaja, K., and Zeevat, H. (2008). Explaining additive, adversative and contrast marking in Russian and English. Revue De Sémantique Et Pragmatique, 24, 65-91.
- Kasimir, E. (2006). On" nicht... sondern..."(contrastive" not... but...". Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), 5, 107-151.
- Lee, A., Prasad, R., Joshi, A., Dinesh, N., and Webber, B. (2006). Complexity of dependencies in discourse: Are dependencies in discourse more complex than in syntax. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Malchukov, A. L. (2004). Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics, 21(2), 177-198.
- Miltsakaki, E., Prasad, R., Joshi, A., and Webber, B. (2004). Annotating discourse connectives and their arguments. Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation.
- Potts, C. (2013). Presupposition and implicature. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved on September 24, 2014 from http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WY2NDcxN/pottsblackwellsemantics.pdf.
- Redeker, G., and Egg, M. (2006). Says who? On the treatment of speech attributions in discourse structure. Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (CID 2006).
- Say, B., Zeyrek, D., Oflazer, K., and Özge, U. (2002). Development of a corpus and a treebank for present-day written Turkish. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of Turkish Linguistics.
- Turan, Ü. D. (2011). Ölçümsel sezdirim üzerine gözlemler [Observations on scalar implicatures]. Dilbilim Araştırmaları/Journal of Linguistic Research, 2011, II: 1-15.
- Turan, Ü. D., and Zeyrek, D. (2011). Context, contrast, and the structure of discourse in Turkish. Fetzer, A., Oishi, E. (Eds.), Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, (pp. 147-168). John Benjamins Publishing.
- Umbach, C. (2005). Contrast and information structure: A focus-based analysis of but. Linguistics, 43(1), 207-232.
- Zeevat, H. (2012). Objection marking and additivity. Lingua, 1886-1898.
- Zeyrek, D., Turan, Ü. D., Demirsahin, I., Cakıcı, R. (2012). Differential properties of three discourse connectives in Turkish. Benz, A., Stede, M., Kühnlein, P. (Eds.). Constraints in Discourse 3: Representing and inferring discourse structure (pp. 183-223). John Benjamins Publishing.
- Zeyrek, D., Demirşahin, I, Sevdik-Çallı, A., Çakıcı, R. (2013). Turkish Discourse Bank: Porting a discourse annotation style to a morphologically rich language. Dialogue and Discourse, 4(2), 174-184.
- Zeyrek, D., and Webber B. (2008). A Discourse Resource for Turkish: Annotating Discourse Connectives in the METU Corpus. The 6th Workshop on Asian Language Resources, The Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, (IJNLP).
| APA | ZEYREK D (2014). Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. , 201 - 212. |
| Chicago | ZEYREK Deniz Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. (2014): 201 - 212. |
| MLA | ZEYREK Deniz Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. , 2014, ss.201 - 212. |
| AMA | ZEYREK D Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. . 2014; 201 - 212. |
| Vancouver | ZEYREK D Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. . 2014; 201 - 212. |
| IEEE | ZEYREK D "Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish." , ss.201 - 212, 2014. |
| ISNAD | ZEYREK, Deniz. "Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish". (2014), 201-212. |
| APA | ZEYREK D (2014). Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0(2), 201 - 212. |
| Chicago | ZEYREK Deniz Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 0, no.2 (2014): 201 - 212. |
| MLA | ZEYREK Deniz Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.0, no.2, 2014, ss.201 - 212. |
| AMA | ZEYREK D Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 0(2): 201 - 212. |
| Vancouver | ZEYREK D Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 0(2): 201 - 212. |
| IEEE | ZEYREK D "Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish." Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0, ss.201 - 212, 2014. |
| ISNAD | ZEYREK, Deniz. "Corrective Discourse Relations in Turkish". Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2 (2014), 201-212. |
