The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths

Mutluay, Abidin Talha; Bayraktar, Yusuf; ŞENGÜN, Abdulkadir; Ercan, Ertugrul; BAĞLAR, SERDAR

The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths

Serdar BAĞLAR, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Yusuf BAYRAKTAR, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Ertuğrul ERCAN, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Abidin Talha MUTLUAY, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Abdulkadir ŞENGÜN (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

1 1

Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 28 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths

Öz:

Amaç: Bu in - vitro çalışmanın amacı MDPmonomeri içeren üç farklı self- etch adeziv sisteminmakaslam a bağ dayanımınlarını değerlendirmektir.Materyal ve Metod: Bu çalışma için atmışadet çekilmiş insan üçüncü molar dişl eri kullanlmıştır.Dişler bir elmas kesme diski yardımıyla ve susoğutması altında kron boylarının orta üçlülerine kadarkesilmiştir. Kesilen dişler rastgele üç gruba ayrılmıştır(n=20). Ultradent Bonding Jig yardımıyla ve üç farklıMDP içeren self-etch ad eziv sis tem kullanılarakrestorasyonlar yapılmıştır (2,30 mm çap ve 3mmyükseklik). Sonrasında örnekler test cihazına alınmış vemakaslama bağlanma değerleri ölçülmüştür.Bulgu lar: 1. Ve 2. Grup restorasyonlar, 3.Gruba göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek ma kaslamabağ değeri gösterdi. (p>0.05). Bunun yanında 1.Grubun 2. Gruba göre nispeten daha yüksek bağdeğeri gösterdiği saptandı.Sonuç: Bu in -vitro çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre,bütün grupların optimal bağ değerlerigösterdiğisaptandı. Ancak 1 . ve 2. Gruplar 3. Gruba oranlaanlamlı derecede daha iyi bağlanma değerleri gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

MDP monomer içeren adeziv sistemlerin rekabeti: Makaslama bağ dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması

Öz:

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluatethe shear bond strengths of three MDP monomercontaining self-etch adhesive system s.Material and method: Sixty human third molarswere used for the study. The teeth were sectionedwith a low -speed diamond disk saw under watercoolant to expose mid -coronal dentin. The teeth wererandomly divided into three groups( n=20). Therestoration s (2.30mm diameter and 3mm heigh)builded with using three different MDP containingadhesive systems by aid of Ultradent Bonding Jig.After that, the specimens were placed in a universaltesting machine and the shear bond strength wasmeasured at a crosshe ad speed of 1 mm/min.Result : Group 1 and 2 showed significantly higherbond strength than group 3(p<0.05). There were nosignificant difference in bond strength values betweengroup 1 and 2(p>0.05) in spite of group 1 showedslightly higher bond strength values than group 2.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in -vitrostudy, all groups showed optimal results but first andsecond adhesives showed significantly higher valuesthan third group.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding sys tems to bovine enamel and dentin. Operative De n t 2002;27:88- 94.
2. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. Journal Of Biomedical Material Res 1982;16:265 -73.
3. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pa ng KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total -etch wet- bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74:1168-78.
4. Villela -Rosa AC, Goncalves M, Orsi IA, Miani PK. Shear bond strength of self- etch and total -etch bond ing systems at different dentin depths. Brazilian oral Res 2011;25:109- 15.
5. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Den 1992;5:127- 9.
6. Paradella TC, Fava M. Bond strength of adhesive systems to human tooth enamel. Brazi li an Oral Res 2007;21:4-9.
7. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-702.
8. Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. Efficacy of dentin bonding ag ents combined with self- etching dentin primers containing Phenyl - P. Dent Mat J 1993;12:219-24.
9. Naughton WT, Latta MA. Bond strength of composite to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quintessence I nt 2005;36:259-62.
10. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single -step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371 -82.
11. Kiremitci A, Yalcin F, Gokalp S. Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quintessence I nt 2004;35:367-70.
12. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one -step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001;29:55 - 61.
13. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one - a nd two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthted Dent. 2007;97:216- 22.
14. Senawongse P, Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry [et al]. 2004;16:107- 15; discussion 16.
15. Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S, Jr., Baratieri LN, Vieira LC. Dentin bond strength of self- etching primers/adhesives. Operative Dent 2005;30:63 - 8.
16. Ün lü N ÇA, Cebe MA, Gönlüm Ö. Bond Strengths On Caries-Affected Dentin Of Current Self- Etch And Total Etch Adhesive Systems. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2010;20: 162- 9
17. Bansal S, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N. Technique -sensitivity of dentin -bonding agent application: the effect on shear bond strength using one -step self- etch adhesive in primary molars: an in vitro study. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2010;28:183 -8.
18. Ravikumar N, Shankar P, Indira R. Shear bond strengths of two dentin bonding agents with two desensitizers: An in vitro study. J Conservative Dent: JCD. 2011;14:247-51.
19. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757-85.
20. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008;87:757- 61.
21. Wang T, Nikaido T, Nakabayashi N. Photocure bonding agent containing phosphoric methacrylate. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 1991;7:59-62.
22. Chigira H, Yukitani W, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Hayakawa T, et al. Self- etching dentin primers containing phenyl - P. J Dent Res 1994;73:1088-95.
23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Operative Dent 2003;28:215 -35.
24. Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Takahashi K, Nemoto K. The pKa effects of the carboxylic acid in N- methacryloyl -omega -amino acid on the demineralization and bond strengths to the teeth. Biomaterials 2004;25:5441 -7.
25. Fu B, Sun X, Qian W, Shen Y, Chen R, Hannig M. Evidence of chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite by phosphoric acid esters. Biomaterials 2005;26:5104- 10.
26. Fujita K, Nishiyama N. 13C NMR analysis of the etching efficacy of acidic monomers in self- etching primers. Journal of dentistry. 2006;34:1 23 -33.
27. Fujita K, Ma S, Aida M, Maeda T, Ikemi T, Hirata M, et al. Effect of reacted acidic monomer with calcium on bonding performance. J Dent Res 2011;90:607-12.
28. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Eviden ce of chemical bonding at biomaterial - hard tissue interfaces. J J Dent Res 2000;79:709- 14.
29. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8.
30. Yoshida H, Nishiyama N. Development of self etching primer comprised of methacrylamide, N methacryloyl glycine. Biomaterials 2003;24:5203 -7
31. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D Hayakawa S, Mine A, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces fo hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomaterialia 2010;6:3573 -82.
32. Hasegawa T, Retief DH. Laboratory evaluation o experimental restorative systems containing 4 META. Am J Dent 1994;7:212- 6.
33. 33. Salz U, Bock T. Adhesion performance of new hydrolytically stable one - component self- etching enamel/dentin adhesives. J Adhesive Den 2010;12:7-10.
34. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N Irie M, Ogawa T, et al. Nanolayering of phosphori acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Bi om ateria 2011;7:3187-95.
35. Li N, Nikaido T, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Makishi P Chen J, et al. The role of functional monomers in bonding to enamel: acid - base resistant zone and bonding performance. J Dent 2010;38:722-30.
36. Iwai H, Nishiyama N. Effect of calcium salt o functional monomer on bonding performance. Dent Res 2012;91:1043 -8.

APA	BAĞLAR S, Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Mutluay A, ŞENGÜN A (2015). The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. , 21 - 28.
Chicago	BAĞLAR SERDAR,Bayraktar Yusuf,Ercan Ertugrul,Mutluay Abidin Talha,ŞENGÜN Abdulkadir The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. (2015): 21 - 28.
MLA	BAĞLAR SERDAR,Bayraktar Yusuf,Ercan Ertugrul,Mutluay Abidin Talha,ŞENGÜN Abdulkadir The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. , 2015, ss.21 - 28.
AMA	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. . 2015; 21 - 28.
Vancouver	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. . 2015; 21 - 28.
IEEE	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A "The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths." , ss.21 - 28, 2015.
ISNAD	BAĞLAR, SERDAR vd. "The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths". (2015), 21-28.

APA	BAĞLAR S, Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Mutluay A, ŞENGÜN A (2015). The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 21 - 28.
Chicago	BAĞLAR SERDAR,Bayraktar Yusuf,Ercan Ertugrul,Mutluay Abidin Talha,ŞENGÜN Abdulkadir The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 25, no.1 (2015): 21 - 28.
MLA	BAĞLAR SERDAR,Bayraktar Yusuf,Ercan Ertugrul,Mutluay Abidin Talha,ŞENGÜN Abdulkadir The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.25, no.1, 2015, ss.21 - 28.
AMA	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 25(1): 21 - 28.
Vancouver	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 25(1): 21 - 28.
IEEE	BAĞLAR S,Bayraktar Y,Ercan E,Mutluay A,ŞENGÜN A "The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths." Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, ss.21 - 28, 2015.
ISNAD	BAĞLAR, SERDAR vd. "The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 25/1 (2015), 21-28.