Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 47 - 70 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis

Öz:
This paper provides a simple introduction to event data analysis, a quantitative data collection and analysis approach that has been used extensively for compiling broad datasets of foreign policy and other international behaviors. The authors define the steps undertaken in creating the Turkish Foreign Affairs Event Dataset (TFAED). This pilot study, which uses a single news source and covers a 23-year period (1990-2013) of foreign affairs in Turkey, was completed to evaluate the feasibility, time, cost, and possible problems that might be encountered with a full-scope study. The paper describes the obstacles encountered during the pilot study s initial phases and discusses a sample of the preliminary findings. The paper concludes with potential uses of the dataset.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aras, Bülent, and Hakan Fidan. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 195-217.
  • Atlı, Altay. “Businessmen as Diplomats: The Role of Business Associations in Turkey’s Foreign Economic Policy.” Insight Turkey 13, no.1 (2011): 109-128.
  • Aydınlı, Ersel and Musa Tuzuner, “Quantifying intelligence cooperation: The United States International Intelligence Behavior (USIIB) dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 5 (2011): 673-682.
  • Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Quantification of Turkey’s Foreign Affairs via Event Data.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantifying Security Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis in Turkey and the Greater Middle East, İstanbul, December 2-4, 2011.
  • Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Time to Quantify Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Setting Standards for a Maturing International Relations Discipline” (forthcoming).
  • Azar, Edward E. “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (1980): 143-152.
  • Bacık, Gökhan. “Turkish-Israeli Relations after Davos: A View from Turkey.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 31- 41.
  • Bond, D., and W. B. Vogele. “Profiles of International Hotspots.” Unpublished manuscript, 1995. Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://vranet.com/papers.html.
  • Bond, Doug, Joe Bond, Churl Oh, J. Craig Jenkins, and Charles Lewis Taylor. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 6 (2003): 733-745.
  • Bond, Doug, and Joe Bond, 1995. Panda Codebook. Cambridge, MA: The Program on Nonviolent Sanctions and Cultural Survival, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
  • Cameocodes. “Cameocodes Wiki Space.”Accessed August 19, 2011. http://cameocodes.wikispaces.com.
  • Davis, David R., Brett Ashley Leeds, and Will H. Moore “Measuring Dissident and State Behaviour: The Intranational Political Interactions (IPI) Project.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Cross-National Data Collection, Texas A&M University, November 21, 1998.
  • Davutoğlu, Ahmet. “Turkey’s Zero-Problems Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy, May 10, 2010. Accessed May 9, 2013. http://jft-newspaper.aub.edu.lb/reserve/data/s11244/s11244.pdf.
  • Engene, Jan Oskar. “Five Decades of Terrorism in Europe: The TWEED Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 1 (2007): 109-112.
  • Francisco, Ronald A. “The Relationship between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 39, No. 2 (1995):263-282.
  • Franzosi, R. “The Press as a Source of Sociohistorical Data.” Historical Methods 20, no. 1 (1987): 5-16.
  • Giray, Saziya Burcu. “Turkish Policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” In Muslim Attitudes to Jews and Israel:The Ambivalences of Rejection, Antagonism, Tolerance and Cooperation, edited by Moshe Maoz, 169- 185. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press, 2012.
  • Goldstein, Joshua S. “A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (1992): 369-385.
  • Hill, Fiona, and Omer Taspinar. “Turkey and Russia: Axis of the Excluded?” Survival 48, no. 1 (2006): 81-92.
  • Houghton, Brian K. “Terrorism Knowledge Base: A Eulogy (2004-2008).” Perspectives on Terrorism 2, no. 7 (2008): 18-19.
  • Howell, Llewellyn D., and Gillian Barnes. “Event Data for Region-Specific Interactions: A Research Note on Source Coverage.” In International Event-Data Developments: DDIR Phase II, edited by Richard L. Merritt, Robert G. Muncaster, and Dina A. Zinnes, 45-54. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.
  • Kalın, İbrahim. “Turkey and the Middle East: Ideology or Geo-politics?” Private View (2008): 26-35.
  • Kirişçi, Kemal. “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 29-57.
  • Kutlay, Mustafa. “Economy as the ‘Practical Hand’ of ‘New Turkish Foreign Policy’: A Political Economy Explanation.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 67-88.
  • Laçiner, Sedat. “Yeni Dönemde Türk Dış Politikasının Felsefesi, Fikri Altyapısı ve Hedefleri.” In Yeni Dönemde Türk Dış Politikası: Uluslararası IV. Türk Dış Politikası Sempozyumu Tebliğleri, edited by Osman Bahadir Dincer, Habibe Özdal, and Hacali Necefoğlu. Ankara: USAK, 2010.
  • Larrabee, Stephen F. “Turkey Rediscovers Middle East.” Foreign Affairs 86, no. 4 (2007): 103-114.
  • Leetaru, Kalev, and Philip A. Schrodt. “GDELT: Global Data on Events, Location and Tone 1979-2012.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association meetings, San Francisco, April 2013.
  • McClelland, Charles A. World Event/Interaction Survey (WEIS) 1966-1978 (ICPSR5211). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1978.
  • Meral, Ziya, and Jonathan Paris. “Decoding Turkish Foreign Policy Hyperactivity.” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 4 (October 2010): 75-86.
  • Oğuzlu, Tarık, and Mustafa Kibaroğlu. “Is the Westernization Process Losing Pace in Turkey: Who’s to Blame?” Turkish Studies 10, no. 4 (2009): 577-593.
  • Oğuzlu, Tarık. “Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West?” Turkish Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 3-20.
  • Oğuzlu, Tarık. “The Changing Dynamics of Turkey–Israel Relations: A Structural Realist Account.” Mediterranean Politics 15, no. 2 (2010): 273-288.
  • Olzak, S. “Analysis of Events in Studies of Collective Actions.” Annual Review of Sociology 15 (1989): 119-141. Öniş, Ziya. “Multiple Faces of the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 47-65.
  • Özcan, Mesut, and Ali Resul Usul. “Understanding the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Changes within Continuity, Is Turkey Departing From The West?” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Dış Politika 6, no. 21 (2010): 101-123. R Foundation for Statistical Computing . “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” http:// www.R-project.org/.
  • R Project. “Events: Store and Manipulate Event Data,” http://CRAN.R- project.org/package=events.HYPERLINK. Renda, Kadri Kaan. “Turkey’s Neighbourhood Policy: An Emerging Complex Interdepence.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 89-108.
  • Rucht, D., R. Koopmans, and F. Neidhardt, eds. Acts of Dissent. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. Schrodt, Philip A., Shannon G. Davis, and Judy L. Weddle. “Political Science: KEDS - A Program for the Machine Coding of Event Data.” Social Science Computer Review 12, no. 3 (1994): 561-588.
  • Schrodt, Phillip A. TABARI Textual Analysis by Augmented Replacement Instructions Version 0.8.4 Manual, 2012, available at http://eventdata.psu.edu/tabari.dir/tabari.manual.0.8.4b1.pdf .
  • Schrodt, Philip A., and Deborah J. Gerner. Analyzing International Event Data (2001/2012). http://eventdata.psu. edu/papers.dir/automated.html.
  • Schrodt, Philip A., and David Van Brackle. “Automated Coding of Political Event Data” in Handbook of Computational Approaches to Counterterrorism, V.S. Subrahmanian (ed.) 2013, 23-49, Springer Science and Business Media, NY.
  • Shellman, S. M. “Quantifying Violence and Nonviolence: Terrorism & Political Violence Events Data Sets.” Electronic Newsletter of the ECPR-SG on Extremism & Democracy 9, no. 2 (2008). Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.tufts.edu/~dart01/extremismanddemocracy/newsletter/Article7_4.html.
  • Walker, Joshua. “Learning Strategic Depth: Implications of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy Doctrine.” Insight Turkey 9, no.3 (2007): 32-47.
  • Yılmaz, Ömür. “Turkish Military: the Key to Credible Commitment to Democracy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, California, March 22, 2006. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100868_index.html.
  • Yılmaz, Ömür. “The Kurdish Insurgency in Turkey: Pre- and Post-Ocalan.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago, February 28, 2007. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p179221_index.html.
  • Yılmaz, Ömür. “Turkey Data Set.” Accessed August 19, 2011. http://web.ku.edu/~keds/data.html.
  • Yonamine, James E. “Working with Event Data: A Guide to Aggregation Choices.” Unpublished paper. Accessed 25 April, 2013. http://jayyonamine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Working-with-Event-Data-A-Guide-toAggregation-Choices.pdf.
APA TÜZÜNER M, Biltekin G (2013). A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. , 47 - 70.
Chicago TÜZÜNER Musa,Biltekin Gonca A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. (2013): 47 - 70.
MLA TÜZÜNER Musa,Biltekin Gonca A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. , 2013, ss.47 - 70.
AMA TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. . 2013; 47 - 70.
Vancouver TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. . 2013; 47 - 70.
IEEE TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G "A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis." , ss.47 - 70, 2013.
ISNAD TÜZÜNER, Musa - Biltekin, Gonca. "A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis". (2013), 47-70.
APA TÜZÜNER M, Biltekin G (2013). A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 2(2), 47 - 70.
Chicago TÜZÜNER Musa,Biltekin Gonca A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 2, no.2 (2013): 47 - 70.
MLA TÜZÜNER Musa,Biltekin Gonca A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, vol.2, no.2, 2013, ss.47 - 70.
AMA TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2013; 2(2): 47 - 70.
Vancouver TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace. 2013; 2(2): 47 - 70.
IEEE TÜZÜNER M,Biltekin G "A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis." All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 2, ss.47 - 70, 2013.
ISNAD TÜZÜNER, Musa - Biltekin, Gonca. "A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey's Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis". All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 2/2 (2013), 47-70.