How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 213 - 221 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?
Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı radyoloji pratiğinde yeni görüntüleme uygulamalarını içeren bir spektrumu derleme şeklinde sunmaktır. Yeni görüntüleme teknikleri vücuttaki farklı sistemlerin yapısal ve fonksiyonel analizleri ile elde edilerek geliştirilmiştir. Son yıllarda, farklı organ ve hastalıkların değerlendirilmesinde birçok araştırmacı yeni görüntüleme modaliteleri üzerine yoğunlaşmaktadır. Bu derleme çalışmada, biz günlük radyoloji pratiğinde güncel görüntüleme tekniklerinin etkinliği ve kullanımını sunduk
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Yeni Görüntüleme Yöntemleri Radyoloji Pratiğine Nasıl Yardım Eder?
Öz: The purpose of this article was to provide an up-to-date review on the spectrum of new imaging applications in the practice of radiology. New imaging techniques have been developed with the objective of obtaining structural and functional analyses of different body systems. Recently, new imaging modalities have aroused the interest of many researchers who are studying the applicability of these modalities in the evaluation of different organs and diseases. In this review article, we present the efficiency and utilization of current imaging modalities in daily radiological practice
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Sanghvi D, Harisinghani M G. Modalities in modern radiology: A synopsis. J Postgrad Med 2010; 56: 85-7. [CrossRef]
- Ogul H, Bayraktutan U, Kizrak Y, et al. Abdominal Perfusion Computed Tomography. Eurasian J Med 2013; 45: 50-57 [CrossRef]
- Provenzale JM, Mukundan S, Barboriak DP. Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization and Assessment of Treatment Response. Radiology 2006; 239: 632- 49. [CrossRef]
- Warach S, Dashe JF, Edelman RR. Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion- weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imag- ing: preliminary analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 53-9. [CrossRef]
- Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, et al. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multi section diffusion weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 199: 391-401. [CrossRef]
- Alsop DC, Detre JA. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin label- ing. Radiology 1998; 208: 410-16. [CrossRef]
- Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007; 243: 148-57. [CrossRef]
- Yang Y, Frank JA, Hou L, Ye FQ, McLaughlin AC, Duyn JH. Multislice imaging of quantitative cerebral perfusion with pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 825-32. [CrossRef]
- Deibler AR, Pollock JM, Kraft RA, Tan H, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA. Arterial spin-labeling in routine clini- cal practice, part 1: technique and artifacts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1228-34. [CrossRef]
- Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinet- ic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standard- ized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10: 223-32. [CrossRef]
- Gaa J, Warach S, Wen P, Thangaraj V, Wielopolski P, Edelman RR. Noninvasive perfusion imaging of human brain tumors with EPISTAR. Eur Radiol 1996; 6: 518-22. [CrossRef]
- Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, et al. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1231-41. [CrossRef]
- Norman D, Axel L, Berninger W, et al. Dynamic computed tomography of the brain: techniques, data analysis, and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136: 759-70. [CrossRef]
- Axel L. Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography.Radiology 1980; 137: 679-86. [CrossRef]
- Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996; 201: 637-48. [CrossRef]
- Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1432-40. [CrossRef]
- Melhem ER, Mori S, Mukundan G, Kraut MA, Pomper MG, van Zijl PC. Diffusion tensor MR imag- ing of the brain and white matter tractography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 3-16. [CrossRef]
- Henson R. Forward inference using functional neu- roimaging: dissociations versus associations. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10: 64-9.
- Poldrack RA. The role of fMRI in cognitive neurosci- ence: where do we stand?". Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008; 18: 223-7. [CrossRef]
- Bulakbasi N, Kocaoglu M, Ors F, Tayfun C, Ucoz T. Combination of single voxel proton MR spectros- copy and apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the evaluation of common brain tumors, AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 23: 225-33.
- Chan Yl, Yeung DKW, Leung SF, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of late delayed radiation-induced injury of the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 130-7. [CrossRef]
- Rand SD, Prost R, Li SJ. Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1999; 9: 379-95.
- Baker PB, Gillard JH, VanZijji PCM, et al. Acute stroke: evaluation with serial proton MR spec- troscopic imaging. Radiology 1994; 192: 723-32. [CrossRef]
- Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, et al. Differentiation between diamagnetic and para- magnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic sus- ceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010; 37: 5165-78. [CrossRef]
- Essig M, Waschkies M, Wenz F, et al. Assessment of brain metastases with dynamic susceptibility- weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial results. Radiology 2003; 228: 193-99. [CrossRef]
- Battal B, Kocaoglu M, Bulakbasi N et-al. Cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging by using phase- contrast MR technique. Br J Radiol 2011; 84: 758- 65. [CrossRef]
- Ophir J, Cespedes EI, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a method for imaging the elasticity in biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13: 111- 34. [CrossRef]
- Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997; 202: 79-86. [CrossRef]
- Yu H, Wilson SR. Differentiation of benign from malignant liver masses with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse technique. Ultrasound Q 2011; 27: 217-23. [CrossRef]
- Balen FG, Allen CM, Lees WR. Review: ultra- sound contrast agents. Clin Radiol 1994;49: 77-82 [CrossRef]
- Correas JM, Lai X, Qi X, Burns PN. Infusion vs bolus of an ultrasound contrast agent; in vivo dose response measurements of BR1. Invest Radiol 2000; 35:72-79 [CrossRef]
- Wilson SR, Burns PN, Muradali D, Wilson JA, Xiaoming L. Harmonic hepatic US with micro- bubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterisation of hemangioma, hepato- cellular carcinoma, and metastasis. Radiology 2000; 215: 153-61 [CrossRef]
- Graser A, Johnson TR, Chandarana H, Macari M. Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 13-23. [CrossRef]
- Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1510-17. [CrossRef]
- Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be elimi- nated to reduce radiation dose? Radiology 2006; 241: 908-14. [CrossRef]
- Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV. Body perfusion CT: technique, clinical applications, and advances. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 161-78. [CrossRef]
- Okada M, Kim T, Murakami T. Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: state of the art CT evaluation (perfu- sion CT/volume helical shuttle scan/dual-energy CT, etc.). Abdom Imaging 2011; 36: 273-81. [CrossRef]
- Merine D, Takayasu K, Wakao F. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of CT dur- ing arterial portography with CT after intraarterial injection of iodized oil. Radiology 1990; 175: 707- 10. [CrossRef]
- Kantarci M, Pirimoglu B, Ozturk G, Aydinli B, Ogul H, Okur A, et al. Clinical utility of hepatic-perfusion computerized tomography in living-donor liver transplantation: a preliminary study. Transplant Proc 2015; 47: 399-407. [CrossRef]
- Bihan DL, Turner R, Moonen CT, Pekar J. Imaging of diffusion and microcirculation with gradient sen- sitization: design, strategy, and significance. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 7-28 [CrossRef]
- Turner R, Bihan DL, Chesnick AS. Echo-planar imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1991; 19: 247-253 [CrossRef]
- Chiu FY, Jao JC, Chen CY, et al. Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images for evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 176-180 [CrossRef]
- Chung SR, Lee SS, Kim N, Yu ES, Kim E, Kuhn B, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for liver fibrosis assessment: a pilot study. Acta Radiol 2015; 56: 1428-36. [CrossRef]
- Hagiwara M, Rusinek H, Lee VS, et al. Advanced liver fibrosis: diagnosis with 3D whole-liver perfu- sion MR imaging initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 372-6.
- Miyazaki K, Collins D, Walker-Samuel S, et al. Quantitative mapping of hepatic perfusion index using MR imaging: a potential reproducible tool for assessing tumour response to treatment with the antiangiogenic compound BIBF 1120, a potent triple angiokinase inhibitor. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1414-21. [CrossRef]
- Ogul H, Kantarci M, Pirimoglu B, et al. The efficiency of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation: a preliminary study. Clin Transplant. 2014; 28: 354-60. [CrossRef]
- Kantarci M, Pirimoglu B, Ogul H, et al. Can biliary- cyst communication be predicted by Gd-EOB- DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography before treat- ment for hepatic hydatid disease? Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 52-8. [CrossRef]
- Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R, et al. Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 173-9. [CrossRef]
- Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N et al. Liver fibro- sis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase to-platelet ratio index. Radiology 2007; 245: 458-66. [CrossRef]
- Bohte AE, vanWerven JR, Bipat S, Stoker J. The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 87-97. [CrossRef]
- Skarpathiotakis M, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, et al. Development of contrast digital mammography. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2419-26. [CrossRef]
- Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F. Digital mammog- raphy: current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 38-44. [CrossRef]
- Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205: 399-406. [CrossRef]
- Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, et al. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys 2006; 33: 482-91. [CrossRef]
- Rogers T, Dabir D, Mahmoud I, et al. Standardization of T1 measurements with MOLLI in differentiation between health and disease: the ConSept study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 78. [CrossRef]
- Aquaro GD, Positano V, Pingitore A, et al. Quantitative analysis of late gadolinium enhance- ment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 21 [CrossRef]
- Kellman P, Aletras AH, Mancini C, McVeigh ER, Arai AE. T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confi- dence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarc- tion compared to turbo spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 891-7. [CrossRef]
- Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2414-4. [CrossRef]
- Anxionnat R, Bracard S, et al. 3D Angiography. Clinical interest. First application in interventional neuroradiology. J Neuroradiol. 1998; 25: 251-62.
- Heautot JF, Chabert E, et al. Analysis of cerebrovas- cular diseases by a new 3-dimensional computer- ized X-ray angiography system. Neuroradiology. 1998; 40: 203-9. [CrossRef]
- Shi WY, Li YD, Li MH, Gu BX, Chen SW, Wang W, Zhang BL, Li M. 3D rotational angiography with volume rendering: The utility in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Neurol India 2010; 58: 908- 13. [CrossRef]
- Kim C, Erpelding TN, Maslov K, Jankovic L, et al. Handheld array-based photoacoustic probe for guiding needle biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes. J Biomed Opt 2010; 1: 046010. [CrossRef]
- Caglic I, Breznik S, Matela J, Barrett T. Lesion Targeted CT-Guided Transgluteal Prostate Biopsy in Combination with Prebiopsy MRI in Patients without Rectal Access. Urol Case Rep 2016; 10: 6-8. [CrossRef]
- Caglic I, Breznik S, Matela J, Barrett T. Lesion Targeted CT-Guided Transgluteal Prostate Biopsy in Combination with Prebiopsy MRI in Patients without Rectal Access. Urol Case Rep 2016; 10: 6-8. [CrossRef]
- Guo W, Hao B, Chen HJ, et al. PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of FDG-avid metastatic bone lesions in patients with advanced lung cancer: a safe and effective technique. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44: 25-32.
- Wang J, Wang X, Liang JW, Gao JD, Bai XF. Clinical application of localized biopsy on breast microcalci- fication. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007; 45: 881-2.
- Dunn AS, Turpie AG. Perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulants: A system- atic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 901-8. [CrossRef]
- Rothenberg LN, Pentlow KS. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics 1992; 12: 1225-43. [CrossRef]
- Evans SH, Davis R, Cooke J, Anderson W. A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examinations for two scanning protocols. Clin Radiol 1989; 40: 45-6. [CrossRef]
- Ogul H, Guzel Y, Pirimoglu B, et al. The clinical and radiological importance of extraarticular contrast material leakage into adjacent synovial compart- ments on ankle MR arthrography in patients with OCD and anterolateral impingement. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1857-66. [CrossRef]
- Ogul H, Karaca L, Can CE, et al. Anatomy, variants, and pathologies of the superior glenohumeral ligament: mag- netic resonance imaging with three-dimensional volu- metric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence and conventional magnetic resonance arthrography. Korean J Radiol 2014; 15: 508-22. [CrossRef]
- Ogul H, Kantarci M, Topal M, et al. Extra-articular contrast material leaks into locations unrelated to the injection path in shoulder MR arthrography. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2606-13. [CrossRef]
- Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. Musculoskeletal tumors: How to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology 2012; 265: 340-56.[CrossRef]
- Subhawong TK, Wang X, Durand DJ, Jacobs MA, Carrino JA, Machado AJ, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in metabolic assessment of musculoskeletal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 162-72. [CrossRef]
- Zaidi H, Mawlawi O, Orton CG. Point / counter- point. Simultaneous PET/MR will replace PET/CT as the molecular multimodality imaging platform of choice. Med Phys 2007; 34: 1525-8. [CrossRef]
- Weigert M, Pietrzyk U, Müller S, Palm C, Beyer T. Whole-body PET/CT imaging: combining software- and hardware-based co-registration. Z Med Phys 2008; 18: 59-66. [CrossRef]
- Alibek S, Vogel M, Sun W, Winkler D, Baker CA, Burke M, Gloger H. Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014; 20: 360-3. [CrossRef]
- GE Healtcare MR imaging products. www.osha.gov.
- GE Healtcare MR imaging products. Available from: URL: magic.gehealthcare.com
- Available from: URL: https://www.frontier.spigit. com/
- Available from: URL: https://www.imaios.com/
- Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220: 781-6. [CrossRef]
- Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after introduction of a computer-aided detec- tion system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 185-90. [CrossRef]
| APA | PİRİMOGLU B, SADE R, OĞUL H, Kantarci M, eren s, LEVENT A (2016). How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. , 213 - 221. |
| Chicago | PİRİMOGLU Berhan,SADE Recep,OĞUL Hayri,Kantarci Mecit,eren suat,LEVENT Akın How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. (2016): 213 - 221. |
| MLA | PİRİMOGLU Berhan,SADE Recep,OĞUL Hayri,Kantarci Mecit,eren suat,LEVENT Akın How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. , 2016, ss.213 - 221. |
| AMA | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. . 2016; 213 - 221. |
| Vancouver | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. . 2016; 213 - 221. |
| IEEE | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A "How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?." , ss.213 - 221, 2016. |
| ISNAD | PİRİMOGLU, Berhan vd. "How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?". (2016), 213-221. |
| APA | PİRİMOGLU B, SADE R, OĞUL H, Kantarci M, eren s, LEVENT A (2016). How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 48(3), 213 - 221. |
| Chicago | PİRİMOGLU Berhan,SADE Recep,OĞUL Hayri,Kantarci Mecit,eren suat,LEVENT Akın How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 48, no.3 (2016): 213 - 221. |
| MLA | PİRİMOGLU Berhan,SADE Recep,OĞUL Hayri,Kantarci Mecit,eren suat,LEVENT Akın How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.48, no.3, 2016, ss.213 - 221. |
| AMA | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2016; 48(3): 213 - 221. |
| Vancouver | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2016; 48(3): 213 - 221. |
| IEEE | PİRİMOGLU B,SADE R,OĞUL H,Kantarci M,eren s,LEVENT A "How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 48, ss.213 - 221, 2016. |
| ISNAD | PİRİMOGLU, Berhan vd. "How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 48/3 (2016), 213-221. |
