Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 47 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde endometrial örnekleme yapılan olgularda endikasyonlar ile histopatolojik sonuçlar arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2010 - Ekim 2016 yılları arasında başvuran ve obstetrik dışı jinekolojik endikasyonlar nedeni ile endometrial örnekleme yapılan 4,247 olgunun verileri Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği ve Patoloji Kliniği arşiv kayıtlarından retrospektif olarak taranarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Olguların yaş ortalaması 46,8+8,22 olup en sık endikasyon menometroraji-menoraji (%70,66) iken en az servikal polip (%1,34) idi. Endometriyal biyopsi sonucu proliferatif-sekretuar endometriyum (%63,62) en sık atipili basit hiperplazi (%1,13) en az histopatolojik sonuç olarak tespit edildi. Endometriyum kanseri postmenaposal kanama ya da endometriyal kalınlık grubunda daha fazla oranda gözlendi (%23,11). Biyopsi yapılan olguların %52,18%'ne histerektomi ameliyatı yapılmıştı. Histerektomi sonucu proliferatif-sekretuar endometriyum (%59,52) en sık atipili basit hiperplazi (%1,13) en az histopatolojik sonuç olarak tespit edildi.Sonuç: Postmenapozal kanama ya da endometrial kalınlık artışı olan olgularda endometriyal değerlendirmeyi takiben örnekleme yapılması uygunken, çalışmamız sonuçlarına göre diğer endikasyonlarda rutin olarak endometrial biyopsi tercih edilmemelidir
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Endometrial Örnekleme ve Histopatoloji Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi; 4.247 Olgunun Analizi
Öz: Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between indications and histopathological results in patients undergoing endometrial sampling.Materials and Methods: Data of 4,247 patients undergoing endometrial sampling due to non-obstetric gynecological causes between January 2010 and October 2016 were retrospectively evaluated using the archives of the Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic of Konya Training and Research Hospital.Results: The mean age of patients was 46.8 ± 8.22 years; the most common indication was menometrorrhagia/menorrhagia (70.66%), and the least common indication was cervical polyp (1.34%). The most common histopathological result was proliferative-secretory endometrium (63.62%); simple hyperplasia with atypia (0.56%) was determined to be the least common result. Endometrial cancer was observed more frequently in the post-menopausal bleeding and increased endometrial thickness group (23.11%). Of patients in whom biopsy was performed, 52.18% had undergone hysterectomy, as a result of which proliferative–secretory endometrium was most commonly (59.52%) and simple hyperplasia with atypia least commonly found as the histopathological diagnosis.Conclusion: Although sampling should be performed following endometrial evaluation in patients with postmenopausal bleeding or increased endometrial thickness, according to the results of our study, routine endometrial biopsy should not be preferred in the other indications
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Sari N, Sahin S, Caglayan EK, Seckin L, Kara M, Ustun YE. Results of our endometrial samplings: analysis of 495 cases. Düzce Tip Dergisi 2015; 17: 70-72.
- 2. Cakmak B, Karatas A, Turan G. Results of our endometrial samplings: analysis of 400 cases. Selcuk Tıp Dergisi 2012; 28: 163-6.
- 3. Yilmaz N, Inal ZO, Hancerliogullari N, Inal HA. The usefullness of office hysteroscopy in evaluation of infertil women prior to in vitro fertilization cycles. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2016; 26: 13-7. [CrossRef]
- 4. Keskin S, Keskin DD, Gungul EE. Results of our endometrial samplings with pipelle: Analysis of 1950 cases. Yeni Tıp Dergisi 2014; 31: 53-7.
- 5. Tosun AK, Tosun I, Suer N, Guzin K. The necessity of the endometrial sampling in preoperative cases which are benign indicated. Abant Med J 2014; 3: 156-60. [CrossRef]
- 6. Kucur SK, Sencan H, Yuksel KB, et al. Evaluatıon of endometrial biopsy results in our clinic; analysis of 744 cases. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bulteni 2014; 45: 146-50. [CrossRef]
- 7. Tuncer R, Uygur D, Kis S. Ankara Zübeyde Hanım Doğumevi 2000 Yılı endometrial biopsi sonuçları: 676 olgunun analizi. MN Klinik Bilimler&Doktor 2003; 9: 97-9.
- 8. Mahajan N, Aggarwal M, Bagga A. Health issues of menopausal women in North India. J Midlife Health 2012; 3: 84-7. [CrossRef]
- 9. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113: 3-13. [CrossRef]
- 10. Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrium>5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 157-62. [CrossRef]
- 11. Tamay AG, Yıldırım Y, Bugday S, et al. Necessity of preoperative endometrial sampling for hysterectomies with benign indications. Cumhuriyet Med J 2010; 32: 329-33.
- 12. Jetley S, Rana S, Jairajpuri ZS. Morphological spectrum of endometrial pathology in middle-aged women with atypical uterine bleeding: A study of 219 cases. J Midlife Health 2013; 4: 216-20. [CrossRef]
- 13. Khare A, Bansal S, Sharma P, Elhence N, N. Makkar, Y Tyagi. Morphological spectrum of Endometrium in patients presenting with Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding. People’s J Sci Res 2012; 5: 13-6.
- 14. Burke TW, Tortolero-Luna G, Malpica A, et al. Enometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1996; 23: 411-56.
- 15. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 23-47. [CrossRef]
- 16. Paula J. Adams Hillard. Kadin ureme organları benign hastaliklari: Semptom ve bulgular. Novak Jinekoloji (Jonathans-Berek, ed) 2004. p.351-420.
- 17. Younis MT, Iram S, Anwar B, Ewies AA. Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gyneacologist or have them removed: an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 150: 190-4. [CrossRef]
- 18. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K, Lammes FB. Is dilatation and curettage obsolete for diagnosing intrauterine disorders in premenepozal patients with persistent abnormal uterine bleeding? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 65-8. [CrossRef]
- 19. Hakverdi S, Gungoren A, Hakverdi A.U, Dolapcioglu K, Ciftci S. Anormal uterin kanamalı kadınlarda uterin ici lezyonun tespitinde D&C tanısal değeri. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2008; 5: 202-6.
- 20. Gebauer G, Hafner A, Siebzehnrübl E, Lang N. Role of hysteroscopy in detection and extraction of endometrial polyps: results of a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 59-63. [CrossRef]
- 21. Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 1131-6. [CrossRef]
APA | OZTURK INAL Z, Inal H, KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ, KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H (2017). Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. , 44 - 47. |
Chicago | OZTURK INAL Zeynep,Inal Hasan Ali,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İlknur,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ HASAN Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. (2017): 44 - 47. |
MLA | OZTURK INAL Zeynep,Inal Hasan Ali,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İlknur,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ HASAN Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. , 2017, ss.44 - 47. |
AMA | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. . 2017; 44 - 47. |
Vancouver | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. . 2017; 44 - 47. |
IEEE | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H "Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases." , ss.44 - 47, 2017. |
ISNAD | OZTURK INAL, Zeynep vd. "Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases". (2017), 44-47. |
APA | OZTURK INAL Z, Inal H, KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ, KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H (2017). Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 49(1), 44 - 47. |
Chicago | OZTURK INAL Zeynep,Inal Hasan Ali,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İlknur,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ HASAN Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 49, no.1 (2017): 44 - 47. |
MLA | OZTURK INAL Zeynep,Inal Hasan Ali,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İlknur,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ HASAN Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.49, no.1, 2017, ss.44 - 47. |
AMA | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2017; 49(1): 44 - 47. |
Vancouver | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2017; 49(1): 44 - 47. |
IEEE | OZTURK INAL Z,Inal H,KÜÇÜKOSMANOĞLU İ,KÜÇÜKKENDİRCİ H "Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 49, ss.44 - 47, 2017. |
ISNAD | OZTURK INAL, Zeynep vd. "Assessment of Endometrial Sampling and Histopathological Results: Analysis of 4,247 Cases". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 49/1 (2017), 44-47. |