AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW

ARSLAN, CEM BARLAS

AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW

Cem Barlas ARSLAN (Kırıkkale University)

IOJET

0 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 106 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW

Öz:

The purpose of this study is to analyze the language structure of tax laws within the scope of ongoing tax complexity in the Turkish law system. Using the qualitative case-study research format, this study included 295 third and fourth year students at Kirikkale University Law Faculty in the spring term of 2015. Participating students were asked for synonyms/meanings of eleven terms which were selected from the Corporate Tax Law that came into force being prepared in the earliest time as a general qualified tax law among tax laws to test the students' knowledge of the language structure of the aforesaid law. The assessment showed that a substantial section of these Law students did not know the meanings of these words.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

James, S. (2007). Tax Simplification Is Not A Simple Issue: The Reasons For Diffıculty And A Possıble Strategy. University of Exeter Discussion Papers in Management. 07/18, 3- 18.
Jones, G. & Rice, P. & Sherwood, J. & Whiting, J. (2015). Developing A Tax Complexity Index Fort He UK, Office of Tax Simplification. June. www.gov.uk/government/publications/office-of-tax-simplification-complexity-index
Karabacak, Y. ( 2013a). Is Tax Complexity an Inevitable End of Modern Tax Systems?. Mali Cozum (Financial Analyze) Journal. P. 120, 15-30.
Karabacak, Y. (2013b). An Essay on Measuring the Complexity Level of the Turkish Tax Laws. Maliye (Public Finance) Journal. P. 165, 38-53.
Karakoc, Y. (2004). Tax Loss and Evasion Arising from Legal Reasons (ArrangementImplementation-Judgement). 19th Symposium on Public Finance in Turkey Antalya. 10- 14 May, 90-114.
Kirbas, S. (2012). The Complexity in Turkish Tax Legislation and Problems Arising From It. Yaklasim (Approach) Journal. P. 232, 13-16.
McKerchar, M. (2007). Tax Complexity and Its Impact on Tax Compliance and Tax Administration in Australia. Proceedings of the 2007 IRS Research Conference. The IRS Research Bulletin. 185-204.
OTS Complexity Index. (2015). www.gov.uk/government/publications/office-of-taxsimplification-complexity-index
Richardson, G. (2006). Taxation Determinants of Fiscal Corruption: Evidence across Countries, Journal of Financial Crime. Vol. 13. No. 3, 2006. 323-338.
Saracoglu, F. (2008). The Assessment of The Effects of Age - Gender - Marital Status and Educational Background on The Attitude to The Tax In the Frame of Survey Results, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences Faculty, P. 10 P. 15 December / 2008, 16-34.
Tuncer, S. (2012). Tax Law and Implementation, V. III, Yaklasim Publishing. Ankara. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences. 5. Edition, Seckin Publishing, Ankara.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Zelenak, L. (2010). Complex Tax Legıslatıon in the Turbotax Era. Columbıa Journal of Tax Law Vol. 1:91, 91-119.
Zucker, D. M. (2007). How to Do Case Study Research. School of Nursing Faculty Publication Series. Paper 2.

APA	ARSLAN C (2016). AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. , 99 - 106.
Chicago	ARSLAN CEM BARLAS AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. (2016): 99 - 106.
MLA	ARSLAN CEM BARLAS AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. , 2016, ss.99 - 106.
AMA	ARSLAN C AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. . 2016; 99 - 106.
Vancouver	ARSLAN C AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. . 2016; 99 - 106.
IEEE	ARSLAN C "AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW." , ss.99 - 106, 2016.
ISNAD	ARSLAN, CEM BARLAS. "AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW". (2016), 99-106.

APA	ARSLAN C (2016). AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. IOJET, 3(2), 99 - 106.
Chicago	ARSLAN CEM BARLAS AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. IOJET 3, no.2 (2016): 99 - 106.
MLA	ARSLAN CEM BARLAS AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. IOJET, vol.3, no.2, 2016, ss.99 - 106.
AMA	ARSLAN C AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. IOJET. 2016; 3(2): 99 - 106.
Vancouver	ARSLAN C AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW. IOJET. 2016; 3(2): 99 - 106.
IEEE	ARSLAN C "AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW." IOJET, 3, ss.99 - 106, 2016.
ISNAD	ARSLAN, CEM BARLAS. "AN ASSESSMENT OF LAW FACULTY STUDENTS' COMPREHENSION LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE OF CORPORATE TAX LAW". IOJET 3/2 (2016), 99-106.