İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ

AKSAN, Muhammet Emin; ATSÜ, SAADET; Bulut, Ali   Can

İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ

Ali Can BULUT (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

5 4

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 91 - 97 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ

Öz:

Stres analizi yöntemleri ağız içi biyomekaniğin daha iyi anlaşılmasına restorasyonlar yapılabilmesine imkan verdikleri için diş hekimliği kullanılmaktadır. Sonlu eleman stres analiz yöntemi birçok implant dizaynının biyomekanik performansının yanı sıra klinik faktörlerin de implant başarısı üzerindeki etkisinin geniş bir biçimde incelenebildiği bir yöntemdir. Bu derleme çalışmasında sonlu elemanlar stres analizi ve implant destekli protez uygulama alanlarıyla ilgili genel bir bakış açısı sunulmaya çalışılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT PROSTHESUS CONNECTION

Öz:

Stress analysis techniques are being used in dental research for a long time because of allowing more successful restorations by giving an aid to a better understanding of biomechanics in the oral environment. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been used extensively to predict the biomechanical performance of various dental implant designs as well as the effect of clinical factors on implant success. This article efforts to give a general overview about finite element stress analysis and its use in the implant-supported prosthesis

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Taşkınsel E, Gümüş HÖ. Sonlu elemanlar stres analizi ve restoratif diş hekimliğinde kullanımı. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 8: 131-5.
2. Geng JP, Tan K, Liu G, Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-98.
3. Kayabaşı O, Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Erzincanlı F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Advances in Engineering 2006; 37: 649–58.
4. Misch, CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 1st ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby 2005; 324-36.
5. Lisa A, Lang LA, Kang BB, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 539-46.
6. Silva GC, Cornacchia TM, Magalhães CS, Bueno AC, Moreira AN. Biomechanical evaluation of screwand cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A nonlinear finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1479-88.
7. Ebadian B, Farzın M, Talebi S, Khodaeian N. Evaluation of stress distribution of implant‑retained mandibular overdenture with different vertical restorative spaces: A finite element analysis. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 117-21.
8. Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/ supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2013; 41: 241-9.
9. Dashti MH, Atashrazm P, Emadi MI, Mishaeel S, Banava S. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residualridge: A 3D finite element analysis. Quint Int Prosthod 2013; 44: 8.
10. Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Barao VAR, Rocha EP. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA, J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 766–74.
11. Prakash V, De Souza M, Adhikari R. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: A three dimensional finite element analysis Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20: 31-6.
12. Meriç G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Tunç Y, Eser A. Influence of prosthesis type and material on thestress distribution in bone around implants: A 3- dimensional finite element analysis, J Dent Sci 2011; 6: 25-32.
13. Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Von Steyern PV, Fukushima S, Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of ımplant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region. J Prosthod 2008; 17: 274–85.
14. Klineberg IJ, Trulsson M, Murray GM. Occlusion on implants - is there a problem? J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39: 522-37.
15. Lin CL, Wang JC, Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 331–40.
16. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago Quintessence 1997; 89-90.
17. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered poroussurfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2005; 20: 69-76.
18. Kwan N, Yang S, Guillaume D, Aboyoussef H, Ganz SD, Weiner S. Resistance to crown displacement on a hexagonal implant abutment. Imp Dent 2004; 13: 112-9.
19. Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, GaneleS J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: prelimary results 0 to 84 months in function: a retrospective study. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 327-32.
20. Grossmann Y, Sadan A. The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 559-62.
21. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant supported restorations J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 1-5.
22. Tawill G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2006; 18: 894- 901.
23. Dantas De Moraes SL, Verri FL, Santiago Junior JF, Augusto De Faria AD, Cantieri De Mello C, Pellizzer FPA. 3-D Finite Element Study of the Influence of Crown-Implant Ratio on Stress Distribition. Brazilian Dent J 2013; 24: 635-41.
24. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chausbu G. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 1934-9.
25. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chausbu G. The effect of splinting implantsupported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 2990-4.
26. Urdaneta RA, Rodriguez S, Mcneil DC, Weed M, Chuang SK. The effect of increased crown-toimplant ratio on single-tooth locking-taper implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2010; 25: 729- 43.
27. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl Res 2009; 20: 67-72.
28. Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants, J. Oral Imp. 2010; 6: 425-33.
29. Sotto-Maior BS, Senna PM, José DSW, Rocha EP, Cury AA. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 13-8.
30. Sutpideler M, Eckert SE, Zobitz M, An KN. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2004; 19: 819-25.
31. Schneider D, Witt L, Hammerle CHF. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin. Oral Impl Res 2012; 23: 169- 74.
32. Verri FR, Batista VE, Santiago JRJF, Almeida DA,Pellizzer EP. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: A finite element analysis. Mater Sci Engineering 2014; 45: 234-40.
33. Lee KJ, Kim YG, Park JW, Lee JM, Suh JY. İnfluence of crown-to-implant ratio on periimplant marginal bone loss in the posterior region: a fiveyear retrospective study. J Periodont Imp Sci 2012; 42: 231-6.
34. Tawill G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2006; 21: 275-82

APA	AKSAN M, ATSÜ S, Bulut A (2018). İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. , 91 - 97.
Chicago	AKSAN Muhammet Emin,ATSÜ SAADET,Bulut Ali Can İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. (2018): 91 - 97.
MLA	AKSAN Muhammet Emin,ATSÜ SAADET,Bulut Ali Can İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. , 2018, ss.91 - 97.
AMA	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. . 2018; 91 - 97.
Vancouver	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. . 2018; 91 - 97.
IEEE	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A "İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ." , ss.91 - 97, 2018.
ISNAD	AKSAN, Muhammet Emin vd. "İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ". (2018), 91-97.

APA	AKSAN M, ATSÜ S, Bulut A (2018). İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 91 - 97.
Chicago	AKSAN Muhammet Emin,ATSÜ SAADET,Bulut Ali Can İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28, no.1 (2018): 91 - 97.
MLA	AKSAN Muhammet Emin,ATSÜ SAADET,Bulut Ali Can İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.28, no.1, 2018, ss.91 - 97.
AMA	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 28(1): 91 - 97.
Vancouver	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 28(1): 91 - 97.
IEEE	AKSAN M,ATSÜ S,Bulut A "İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ." Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, ss.91 - 97, 2018.
ISNAD	AKSAN, Muhammet Emin vd. "İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/1 (2018), 91-97.