Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 46 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator

Öz:
Liman işletme çevresinin rekabetçi doğası, liman işletmecilerine performans ile ilgili hususlarda bir baskı unsuru oluşturmaktadır. Rekabetçi avantajı elde etmek adına, stratejik olarak yapılabilecek hamleler tükendiğinde, geriye kalan tek seçenek limana uğrayan gemileri artırma yolu ile liman performansını yukarı çekmektir. Bu hedefe ulaşmanın bir yolu her bir geminin limanda kaldığı süreyi minimuma indirmektir. Bu çalışma, veri zarflama analizi (VZA) ile, bu hususu geliştirmek için yatırım yapmış bir limanı, çıktı olarak yanaşma zaman farkını (YZF) kullanarak analiz etmektedir. Sonuçlar VZA'nın liman işletmecileri tarafından yatırımlarının değerlendirilmesinde önemli bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik

Yatırımların Liman Verimliliği Üzerine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Performans Göstergesi Olarak Yanaşma Zaman Farkı

Öz:
Highly competitive nature of port business environment puts heavy pressure on port operators on performance related issues. In order to be competitive, after all the other strategic moves are exhausted, what is left is to improve the performance of a port by means of increasing the number of vessels calling the port. One way to achieve this goal is to minimize the time spent at port for each vessel. Using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to evaluate its efficiency, this paper analyzes a port which made investments in order to improve this issue with berthing time difference (BTD) as the output. The results show that DEA method can be a valuable tool for port operators in evaluating the efficiency of their investments
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Denizcilik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Notteboom, T. and Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge?. Maritime Management and Policy, 28 (1): 71-89.
  • [2] Akbayirli, K., Deveci, D. A., Balci, G. and Kurtuluş, E. (2016). Container port selection in contestable hinterlands. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 4(3): 249-265
  • [3] Saeed, N. and Aaby, B. C. (2013). An analysis of factors contributing as selection criteria for users of European container terminals. TRB 2013 Annual Meeting.
  • [4] Cullinane, K. and Wang, T. F. (2006). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and improving container port efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics, 17: 517-566.
  • [5] Barros, C. P. (2003). The measurement of efficiency of Portuguese sea port authorities with DEA. International Journal of Transport Economics, 30 (3): 335-354.
  • [6] Lin, L. C. and Tseng, C. C. (2007). Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the AsiaPacific region. Journal of Maritime Policy & Management, 34 (6): 535- 551.
  • [7] Ng, A. S. F. and Lee, C. X. (2007). Productivity analysis of container ports in Malaysia: A DEA approach. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7: 2940-2952.
  • [8] Min, H. and Park, B. I. (2008). A hybrid data envelopment analysis and simulation methodology for measuring capacity utilization and throughput efficiency of container terminals. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 4 (6): 650–672.
  • [9] Kamble, S. S., Raoot, A. D. and Khanapuri, V. B. (2010). Improving port efficiency: A comparative study of selected ports in India. International Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2 (4): 444-470.
  • [10] Roll Y. and Hayuth Y. (1993). Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Journal of Maritime Policy & Management, 20 (2): 153–161.
  • [11] Min, H. and Park, B. I. (2005). Evaluating the inter-temporal efficiency trends of international container terminals using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 1 (3): 258–277.
  • [12] Barros, C. P. (2006). A benchmark analysis of Italian seaports using data envelopment analysis. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8 (4): 347-365.
  • [13] Ablanedo-Rosas, J. H. and Ruiz-Torres, A. J. (2009). Benchmarking of Mexican ports with data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1 (3): 276-294.
  • [14] Hung, S. W., Lu, W. M. and Wang, T. P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203 (3): 706–713.
  • [15] Munisamy, S. and Singh, G. (2011). Benchmarking the efficiency of Asian container ports. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (4): 1397- 1407.
  • [16] Rajasekar, T., Sania, A. P. and Malabika, D. P. (2014). Measurement of efficiency of major ports in India Sağlam et al. / JEMS, 2018; 6(1): 37-46 46 © UCTEA The Chamber of Marine Engineers Journal of ETA Maritime Science - A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4 (5): 926- 936.
  • [17] Cullinane, K. P. B., Ji, P. and Wang, T. F. (2005). The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry. Journal of Economics and Business, 57 (5): 433-462.
  • [18] Itoh, H. (2002). Efficiency changes at major container ports in Japan: A window application of data envelopment analysis. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14 (2): 133-152.
  • [19] Al-Eraqi, A. S., Mustafa, A., Khader, A. T. and Barros C. P. (2008). Efficiency of Middle Eastern and East African seaports: Application of DEA using window analysis. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23 (4): 597-612.
  • [20] So, S., Kim, J., Cho, G. and Kim, D. (2007). Efficiency analysis and ranking of major container ports in northeast Asia: An application of data envelopment analysis. International Review of Business Research Papers, 33 (2): 486-503.
  • [21] Ateş, A. and Esmer, S. (2013). Türk konteyner terminalleri üzerinde 2009 yılı küresel finans krizinin etkileri. Sayistay Dergisi, 91: 105-125.
  • [22] Ateş, A. and Esmer, S. (2014). Farklı yöntemler ile türk konteyner limanlarının verimliliği, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2014 (1): 61–76.
  • [23] Güner, S. (2015). Proposal of a twostage model for measuring the port efficiency and an implication on Turkish ports. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2): 99-106.
  • [24] Güner, S. (2015). Investigating infrastructure, superstructure, operating and financial efficiency in the management of Turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis. Transport Policy, 40: 36-48.
  • [25] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6): 429–444.
  • [26] Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120 (3): 253- 290.
  • [27] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30 (9): 1078-1092.
  • [28] Cook, W. D., Tone, K. and Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44: 1-4.
  • [29] Panayides, P. M., Maxoulis, C. N., Wang, T. F. and Ng, K. Y. A. (2009). A critical analysis of DEA applications to seaport economic efficiency measurement. Transport Reviews, 29 (2): 183-206.
APA Sağlam B, Açık A, Ertürk E (2018). Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. , 37 - 46.
Chicago Sağlam Bayram Bilge,Açık Abdullah,Ertürk Egemen Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. (2018): 37 - 46.
MLA Sağlam Bayram Bilge,Açık Abdullah,Ertürk Egemen Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. , 2018, ss.37 - 46.
AMA Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. . 2018; 37 - 46.
Vancouver Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. . 2018; 37 - 46.
IEEE Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E "Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator." , ss.37 - 46, 2018.
ISNAD Sağlam, Bayram Bilge vd. "Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator". (2018), 37-46.
APA Sağlam B, Açık A, Ertürk E (2018). Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6(1), 37 - 46.
Chicago Sağlam Bayram Bilge,Açık Abdullah,Ertürk Egemen Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6, no.1 (2018): 37 - 46.
MLA Sağlam Bayram Bilge,Açık Abdullah,Ertürk Egemen Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.6, no.1, 2018, ss.37 - 46.
AMA Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(1): 37 - 46.
Vancouver Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(1): 37 - 46.
IEEE Sağlam B,Açık A,Ertürk E "Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6, ss.37 - 46, 2018.
ISNAD Sağlam, Bayram Bilge vd. "Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6/1 (2018), 37-46.