THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS

Çayan, Gökhan

THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS

Gökhan ÇAYAN (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Hukuk Fakültesi.)

Human Rights Review

5 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 181 - 220 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 01-11-2018

THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS

Öz:

It is possible that between the public officials and the government, some discrepancies may occur because of several reasons such as accepting the duty, continuation of the duty, termination of the duty. After long debates, whether or not these discrepancies may benefit from the assurances that are enlisted in the 6th article of the European Convention of Human Rights; inasmuch as that they are related to either civil rights and obligations or criminal charge. For a long time, the loyalty and trust between the public officials and the government caused that the discrepancies originating from public officials are seen as out of coverage. After several decisions are taken, The European Court of Human Rights accepted that until proven otherwise, the discrepancies originating from possible disputes related to work are in the coverage of the 6th article. In the first part of this research, the right to a fair trial and the assurances granted by these rights; in the second part, the coverage field of the right to a fair trial; in the third part, the applicability of the right to a fair trial in the cases of discrepancies originating from public officials will be laid emphasis on.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

Kamu Görevlilerinin Statüsünden Doğan Uyuşmazlıklarda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı

Öz:

Kamu görevlileri ile Devlet arasından göreve kabul, görevin devamı ve görevin sona ermesi sebebiyle çeşitli uyuşmazlıklar çıkabilir. Bu uyuşmazlıkların Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nin 6. maddesinde tanınan güvencelerden yararlanıp yararlanmayacağı uzun süren değerlendirmeler neticesinde belirlenmiştir. Zira bir uyuşmazlığa Sözleşme’nin 6. maddesinin uygulanabilmesi için söz konusu uyuşmazlığın ya medeni hak ve yükümlülüğe ya da suç isnadına ilişkin olması gerekir. Kamu görevlisi ile Devlet arasında mevcut olan sadakat bağı ve güven duygusu, uzun zaman boyunca kamu görevlilerinden doğan uyuşmazlıkların kapsam dışında görülmesine neden olmuştur. Çeşitli kararlardan sonra Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi, olağan iş ilişkileri sebebiyle ortaya çıkan uyuşmazlıkların 6. madde kapsamında olduğunu karine olarak kabul etmiştir. Bu çalışmamızın ilk bölümünde genel olarak adil yargılanma hakkı ve hakkın sağladığı güvenceler; ikinci bölümünde adil yargılanma hakkının uygulama kapsamı; üçüncü bölümünde de kamu görevlilerinden doğan uyuşmazlıklarda adil yargılama hakkının uygulanabilirliği üzerinde durulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

ZIMMERMANN and STEINER V. SWISS; 8737/79; 13/07/1983; http: //hudoc. echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-57609
ZDANOKA V. LATVIA: 58278/00; 16/03/2006; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-72794
WEBER V. SWISS: 11034/84; 22/05/1990; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57629
VAN DE HURK V. THE NETHERLANDS: 16034/90; 19/04/1994; http: //hudoc. echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-57878
VILHO ESKELINEN and OTHERS V. FINLAND: 63235/00; 19/04/2007; http: // hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-80249
SUKUT V. TURKEY: 59773/00; 11/09/2007; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-91560
SRAMEK V. AUSTRIA: 8790/79; 22/10/1984; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57581
SARIDAS V. TURKEY: 6341/10; 07/07/2015; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-156205
ROLF GUSTAFSON V. SWEDEN: 23196/94; 01/07/1997; http: //hudoc.echr. coe.int/tur?i=001-58051
RAVON V. FRANCE: 18497/03; 21/02/2008; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-85185
RAMBUS V. GERMANY: 40382/04; 16/06/2009; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-93430
PROCOLA V. LUXEMBOURG: 14570/89; 28/09/1995; http: //hudoc.echr.coe. int/tur?i=001-57944
POISS V. AUSTRIA: 9816/82; 29/09/1987; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57559
PIERSACK V. BELGIUM: 8692/79; 26/10/1984: http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57556
PELLEGRIN V. FRANCE: 28541/95; 08/12/1999; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-58402
OLUJIC V. CROTIA: 22330/05; 05/02/2009; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-91144
JOKSAS V. LITHUANIAN: 25330/07; 12/11/2013; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-138443
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN VE DE MEYERE V. BELGIUM: 6878/75, 7238/75; 18/10/1982; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-57521
LECHNER V. AUSTRIA: 9316/81; 23/04/1987; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57520
KYPRIANOU V. SOUTH CYPRUS: 73797/01; 15/12/2005; http: //hudoc.echr. coe.int/tur?i=001-71671
HENRYK URBAN and RYSZARD URBAN V. POLAND: 23614/08; 30/11/2010 http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-101962
GUINCHO V. PORTUGAL: 8990/80; 10/07/1984; http: // hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57497
FAYEDV.UNITED KINGDOM: 17101/90; 21/09/1994; http: //hudoc.echr.coe. int/tur?i=001-5789
ENGEL and OTHERS V. THE NETHERLANDS: 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/72, 5370/72; 23/11/1976; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur?i=001-57478
DEWEER V. BELGIUM: 6903/75; 27/05/1980 http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57469
CAPUANO V. ITALY: 9381/81; 25/06/1987; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-57458
BUSCEMI V. ITALY: 29569/95 16/09/1999; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-58304
BOCK V. GERMANY: 11118/84; 19/09/1989; http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-55475
BENTHEM V. THE NETHERLANDS: 8848/80; 23/10/1985 http: //hudoc.echr. coe.int/tur?i=001-57436
BAKA V. HUNGARY: 20261/12; 27/05/2014 http: //hudoc.echr.coe.int/ tur?i=001-144139
Yüksel Hatice, Uluslararası Sözleşmelerde ve Türk Hukukunda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Ankara 2010.
Vitkauskas Dovydas and Lewis- Anthony Sian, Right to A Fair Trial Under the European Convention On Human Rights (Article 6), Interights Published 2009.
Vitkauskas Dovydas and Dikov Grigoriy, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Kapsamında Adil Yargılanma Hakkının Korunması, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 2012.
Toydemir Seçkin, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Çerçevesinde Türk İdari Yargı Sistemi, Master’s Thesis, Istanbul 2013.
Sanivar Ramadan, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesinin 6. Maddesi Çerçevesinde Adil Yargılanma Hakkı ve Sanığa Tanınan Temel Güvenceler, Master’s Thesis, Gazimagusa 2012.
Rozakis Christos, The Right To A Fair Trial: The Light Of European Court Of Human Rights’ Decision, Oxford University Press, London 2013.
Rozakis Christos, The Right To A Fair Trial in Civil Cases, Judicial Studies Institute Review, Vol: Iss. 4: 2, 2004.
Robinson Patric, The Right to Fair Trail in International Law, with Specific Reference to the Work of The ICTY, Berkelet J.L Int’l L. Publicist, Vol. 3.
Osce- Digest, Legal Digest Of International Fair Trial Rights, OHDIR Publishing, Warsaw 2012.
Mole Nuala End Harby Catharina, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nin Uygulanmasına İlişkin Klavuz, Council of Europe, Germany 2001.
Kaşıkara Serhat, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nin 6. Maddesi Çerçevesinde Makul Süre İçerisinde Yargılanma Hakkı, TBB Review, Iss. 84, Ankara 2009.
İnceoğlu Sibel, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı ve Yargı Etiği, Council of Europe, Ankara 2007.
Görür Hamit, Adil Yargılanma ve İdari Yargıda Görünümü, Master’s Thesis, İzmir 2010.
Dutertre Gilles, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararlarından Örnekler, Extraits Cles De Jurisprudence- Cour Europeenne Des Droits De I’ Homme, Council of Europe, Germay 2003.
Celik Adem, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Türk Hukuku, Adalet Publishing, Ankara 2007.
Çayan Gökhan, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Legal Publising, İstanbul 2016.
Bayrakci Esra Tugba, Adil Yargılanma Hakkının Bir Unsuru Olarak Savunma Hakkı, Master’s Thesis, Kırıkkale 2011.
Banaszak Roland A., Fair Trial Rights of the Accused: A Documentry History, Greenwood Pubished, First Edition, 2002.
Aydin Bihter, Türk İdari Yargı Düzeninde Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Master’s Thesis, Ankara 2012.

APA	Çayan G (2016). THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. , 181 - 220.
Chicago	Çayan Gökhan THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. (2016): 181 - 220.
MLA	Çayan Gökhan THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. , 2016, ss.181 - 220.
AMA	Çayan G THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. . 2016; 181 - 220.
Vancouver	Çayan G THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. . 2016; 181 - 220.
IEEE	Çayan G "THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS." , ss.181 - 220, 2016.
ISNAD	Çayan, Gökhan. "THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS". (2016), 181-220.

APA	Çayan G (2016). THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. Human Rights Review, 1(11), 181 - 220.
Chicago	Çayan Gökhan THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. Human Rights Review 1, no.11 (2016): 181 - 220.
MLA	Çayan Gökhan THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. Human Rights Review, vol.1, no.11, 2016, ss.181 - 220.
AMA	Çayan G THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. Human Rights Review. 2016; 1(11): 181 - 220.
Vancouver	Çayan G THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS. Human Rights Review. 2016; 1(11): 181 - 220.
IEEE	Çayan G "THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS." Human Rights Review, 1, ss.181 - 220, 2016.
ISNAD	Çayan, Gökhan. "THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN THE DISCREPANCIES ORIGINATING FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ STATUS". Human Rights Review 1/11 (2016), 181-220.