Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Seval CEYLAN, (Division of Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey)
Atilla GÜMÜŞGÜN, (Division of Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey)
Ferhan FERATLAR (Division of Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey)
ENT Updates
2 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 27 - 32 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.2399/jmu.2018001009 İndeks Tarihi: 25-09-2019

Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Öz:
Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare ABR threshold values, V. wave latency times, amplitudes obtained using Click ABR and CEChirp ABR methods and procedural times of these tests in patients with bilateral hearing loss. Methods: A total of 19 adult male patients were included in the study. ABR latency times with 10 dB decreases starting from 100 dB, V. wave latencies, V. wave amplitudes obtained using Click ABR and CE-Chirp ABR methods and procedural times were compared for both ears. Results: Procedural time for CE-Chirp ABR test was found to be shorter than that of Click ABR test (p=0.001). For both ears, mean CE-Chirp ABR threshold values were more favorable than those of Click ABR test [(60.15±10.34 vs. 62.27±9.93) dB nHL, p<0.006]. For both ears, the threshold values of mean pure tone audiometry were estimated as following: 1 KHz (55.00±14.36 dB), 2 KHz (60.00±13.40 dB) and 4 KHz (63.48±10.57 dB). The corresponding values were calculated 62.27±9.93 dB nHL and 60.15±10.34 dB nHL using Click ABR and CE-Chirp ABR methods, respectively. Procedural time for CE-Chirp ABR test was shorter than that of Click ABR test [(24.89±4.74 vs. 28.63±4.98) min., p=0.001]. Conclusion: It has been determined that the use of CE-Chirp stimulus shortened ABR procedural time and provided responses closer to behavioral threshold values. In conclusion, we observed that CE-Chirp method was more advantageous than Click ABR method for the evaluation of the patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kulak, Burun, Boğaz

Bilateral sensorinöral iflitme kay›pl› hastalarda CE-Chirp ABR ve Click ABR yöntemlerinin karfl›laflt›r›lmas›

Öz:
Bu çal›flmada bilateral sensorinöral iflitme kayb› olan hastalarda Click ABR ve CE-Chirp ABR yöntemleri ile elde edilen ABR eflikleri, V. dalga latans bulgular›, amplitüd bulgular› ve test sürelerinin karfl›laflt›r›lmas› amaçlanm›flt›r. Yöntem: Bilateral sensorinöral iflitme kayb› bulunan 19 yetiflkin erkek hasta çal›flmaya dahil edildi. Click ABR ve CE-Chirp ABR yöntemleri ile her iki kulakta 100 dB’den bafllanarak 10 dB’lik düflüfllerle elde edilen ABR eflikleri, V. dalga latanslar›, V. dalga amplitüdleri ve test süreleri karfl›laflt›r›ld›. Bulgular: CE-Chirp ABR test süresi Click ABR test süresinden daha k›sa bulundu (p=0.001). Her iki kulak için ortalama CE-Chirp ABR eflikleri Click ABR efliklerinden daha iyi saptand› [(60.15±10.34 vs. 62.27±9.93) dB nHL, p<0.006]. Her iki kulakta ortalama pure toneaudiometry 1 KHz eflikleri 55.00±14.36 dB, 2 KHz eflikleri 60.00±13.40 dB, ve 4 KHz eflikleri 63.48±10.57 dB olarak tespit edildi. Bu de¤erler, Click ABR ile 62.27±9.93 dB nHL, CE-Chirp ABR ile 60.15±10.34 dB nHL olarak ölçüldü. CE-Chirp ABR test süresi Click ABR test süresinden daha k›sa bulundu [(24.89±4.74 vs. 28.63±4.98) dakika, p=0.001]. Sonuç: CE-Chirp uyaran kullan›m›n›n ABR test süresini k›saltt›¤› ve davran›flsal efliklere daha yak›n cevaplar sa¤lad›¤› belirlenmifltir. Sonuç olarak bilateral sensorinöral iflitme kay›pl› hastalar›n de¤erlendirilmesinde CE-Chirp ABR yönteminin Click ABR yönteminden daha avantajl› oldu¤u gözlenmifltir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kulak, Burun, Boğaz
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Hall JW. Overview of auditory neurophysiology: past, present and future. New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2007.
  • Burkard R, McNerney K. Introduction to auditory evoked potentials. In: Katz J, Burkard R, Medwetsky L, Hood L, editors. Handbook of clinical audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 222–41.
  • Dau T, Wagner O, Mellert V, Kollmeier B. Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilarmembrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1530–40.
  • Shore SE, Nuttall AL. High synchrony compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;78:1286–95.
  • Prigge L, Weller S, Weatherby L. Auditory brainstem response and the travelling wave delay. Canadian Hearing Report 2012;7: 33–4.
  • Pushpalatha ZV, Konadath S. Auditory brainstem responses for click and CE-chirp stimuli in individuals with and without occupational noise exposure. Noise Health 2016;18:260–5.
  • Elberling C. Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;124:3022–37.
  • Yardımcı S. işitsel beyin sapı yanıtlarının uyarılmasında chirp sinyalinin yeri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Biyofizik Programı Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara, 2006.
  • Stuart A, Cobb KM. Effect of stimulus and number of sweeps on the neonate auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 2014;35:585– 8.
  • Young G, Keogh T, Glennon S. Review of newborn hearing screening regimes and associated screening devices. National Screening Unit Ministry of Health New Zeland 2014:40.
  • Cebulla M, Lurz H, Shehata-Dieler W. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:631–6.
  • Cho SW, Han KH, Jang HK, Chang SO, Jung H, Lee JH. Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp(R) stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2015; 54:700–4.
  • Khorsand Sabet V, Mandavi-Zafarghandi ME, Safavi M, Sharifian M, Tabatabaee SM. Comparison of click and CE-Chirp-evoked human auditory brainstem responses: a preliminary study. [Article in Persian] Auditory and Vestibular Research 2014;23:69–76.
  • Maloff ES, Hodd LJ. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss. Ear Hear 2014;35:271–82.
  • Hamada SM, Salwa M, Abdel Latif MD, Hoda IA. The verification of ABR response bye using the Chirp stimulus in moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Med J Cairo Univ 2013;81:21–6.
  • Rodrigues GRL, Lewis DR. Comparison of Click and CE-Chirp stimuli on Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential recording. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17:413.
  • Di Scipio E, Mastronardi L. CE-Chirp® ABR in cerebellopontine angle surgery neuromonitoring: technical assessment in four cases. Neurosurg Rev 2015;38:381–4.
  • Chertoff M, Lichtenhan J, Willis M. Click and chirp evoked human compound action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127: 2992–6.
  • Kristensen SG, Elberling C. Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2012:23;9:712–21.
APA ceylan s, GÜMÜŞGÜN A, FERATLAR F (2018). Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. , 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
Chicago ceylan seval,GÜMÜŞGÜN Atilla,FERATLAR Ferhan Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. (2018): 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
MLA ceylan seval,GÜMÜŞGÜN Atilla,FERATLAR Ferhan Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. , 2018, ss.27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
AMA ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. . 2018; 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
Vancouver ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. . 2018; 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
IEEE ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F "Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss." , ss.27 - 32, 2018. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
ISNAD ceylan, seval vd. "Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss". (2018), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.2399/jmu.2018001009
APA ceylan s, GÜMÜŞGÜN A, FERATLAR F (2018). Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. ENT Updates, 8(1), 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
Chicago ceylan seval,GÜMÜŞGÜN Atilla,FERATLAR Ferhan Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. ENT Updates 8, no.1 (2018): 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
MLA ceylan seval,GÜMÜŞGÜN Atilla,FERATLAR Ferhan Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. ENT Updates, vol.8, no.1, 2018, ss.27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
AMA ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. ENT Updates. 2018; 8(1): 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
Vancouver ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. ENT Updates. 2018; 8(1): 27 - 32. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
IEEE ceylan s,GÜMÜŞGÜN A,FERATLAR F "Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss." ENT Updates, 8, ss.27 - 32, 2018. 10.2399/jmu.2018001009
ISNAD ceylan, seval vd. "Comparison of CE-Chirp ABR and Click ABR methods in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss". ENT Updates 8/1 (2018), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.2399/jmu.2018001009
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 8:51

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları