Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 111 - 122 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17263/jlls.547634 İndeks Tarihi: 08-01-2020

Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention

Öz:
This study investigated whether encountering the target language words in variety of reading texts would havepositive effects on vocabulary development or not. The participants of the study were 55 EFL learners from a stateuniversity in Turkey, and two classes were randomly assigned to a control (n=27) or an experimental (n=28) group.58 English target words in total were chosen to be used in the study. The learners in the experimental group learntthe words through reading texts, and then they repeated them in different reading texts. That is to say, these studentshad the opportunity to meet the target words in different types of reading texts. Contrary to this, the learners in thecontrol group encountered the words in reading texts only once, and then they repeated them in word lists out ofcontext. A vocabulary test as pre-, post- and delayed post-test was used to measure vocabulary gain and retention.The data obtained from the vocabulary test were analyzed through paired-samples t-tests and independent-samplest-tests to see how the implementation affected the learners’ vocabulary development. Additionally, a writing taskwas used to find out the effects of the implementation on the learners’ vocabulary production. The findings showedthat encountering words in different reading texts was more effective for vocabulary gain, use and retention.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

Farklı okuma parçalarının kelime kazanımına, kullanımına ve kalıcılığına etkisi

Öz:
Bu çalışma hedef dile ait kelimelere farklı okuma parçalarında karşılaşılmasının kelime gelişimine olumlu etki edip etmeyeceğini araştırmıştır. Çalışmaya Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinden İngilizce’yi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen 55 öğrenci katılmıştır ve çalışmaya kontrol (27 kişi) ve deney grubu (28 kişi) olmak üzere iki grup dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılmak üzere toplamda 58 İngilizce kelime seçilmiştir. Deney grubundaki öğrenciler kelimeleri okuma parçalarında öğrenmiş ve daha sonra bu kelimeleri farklı okuma parçalarında tekrar etmişlerdir. Yani, bu öğrenciler kelimeleri çeşitli okuma parçalarında görme fırsatını yakalamışlardır. Bunun aksine, kontrol grubundaki öğrenciler kelimelere okuma parçasında sadece bir kez karşılaşmış ve daha sonra bu kelimeleri bağlam dışında kelime listelerinde tekrar etmişlerdir. Kelime kazanımını ve kalıcılığını ölçmek için ön, son, ve geciktirilmiş son test olarak bir kelime testi kullanılmıştır. Uygulamanın kelime gelişimine etkisini görmek için kelime testinden elde edilen veriler bağımlı örneklem t testi ve bağımsız örneklem t testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Buna ek olarak, uygulamanın kelime üretimine etkisini bulmak için yazma akvitesi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, kelimelere farklı okuma parçalarında karşılaşmanın kelime kazanımı, kullanımı ve kalıcığı için daha etkili olduğunu göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. London: Continuum.
  • Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Shahry, M. N. N. (2011). The effect of three consecutive context sentences on EFL vocabulary learning. TESL Canada Journal, 28(2), 74-89.
  • Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Context variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words: An instance-based learning approach. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 122-159.
  • Butler, L. (2003). Password 1: A reading and vocabulary text. New York: Longman.
  • Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson: Longman.
  • Kamil, M. L., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McCarten, J. (2007). Teaching vocabulary: Lessons from the corpus, lessons for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCarthy, M., O'Keeffe, A., & Walsh, S. (2010). Vocabulary matrix: Understanding, learning, teaching. Hampshire: Cengage Learning.
  • Nagy, W. (2005). Why vocabulary instruction needs to be long-term and comprehensive. In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 27- 44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nash, H., & Snowling, M. (2006). Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41(3), 335-354.
  • Nation, I. S. P., & Meara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 35-54). London: Arnold.
  • National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
  • Nitsch, K.E. (1978). Structuring decontextualized forms of knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt.
  • Oxford, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning. A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada Journal, 7(2), 9-30.
  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schouten-van Parreren, M. C. (1989). Vocabulary learning through reading: which conditions should be met when presenting words in texts? AILA Review, 6, 75-85.
  • Sedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 33-45.
  • Soureshjani, K. H. (2011). The effect of contextualizing and decontextualizing techniques on lexicaloriented knowledge of Persian EFL language learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 547-552.
  • Stahl, S. A. (1991). Beyond the instrumentalist hypothesis: Some relationships between word meanings and comprehension. In P. Schwanenflugel (ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 157-178). Hillsdale, N.H.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Stahl, S. A. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 95-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Stahl, S. A. (2009). Words are learned incrementally over multiple exposures. In M. F. Graves (Ed.), Essential readings on vocabulary instruction (pp.69- 71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72-110.
  • Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Takac, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited. Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Arnold.
  • Xu, J. (2009). An experimental study on the effects of different reading tasks on L2 vocabulary acquisition. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 69-79.
APA Okyar H, ÇAKIR A (2019). Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. , 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
Chicago Okyar Hatice,ÇAKIR Abdulhamit Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. (2019): 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
MLA Okyar Hatice,ÇAKIR Abdulhamit Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. , 2019, ss.111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
AMA Okyar H,ÇAKIR A Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. . 2019; 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
Vancouver Okyar H,ÇAKIR A Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. . 2019; 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
IEEE Okyar H,ÇAKIR A "Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention." , ss.111 - 122, 2019. 10.17263/jlls.547634
ISNAD Okyar, Hatice - ÇAKIR, Abdulhamit. "Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention". (2019), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547634
APA Okyar H, ÇAKIR A (2019). Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
Chicago Okyar Hatice,ÇAKIR Abdulhamit Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 15, no.1 (2019): 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
MLA Okyar Hatice,ÇAKIR Abdulhamit Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol.15, no.1, 2019, ss.111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
AMA Okyar H,ÇAKIR A Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2019; 15(1): 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
Vancouver Okyar H,ÇAKIR A Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2019; 15(1): 111 - 122. 10.17263/jlls.547634
IEEE Okyar H,ÇAKIR A "Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention." Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15, ss.111 - 122, 2019. 10.17263/jlls.547634
ISNAD Okyar, Hatice - ÇAKIR, Abdulhamit. "Effects of different reading texts on vocabulary gain, use and retention". Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 15/1 (2019), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547634