RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS

Yusuf BAYRAKTAR, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)
Hüseyin HATIRLI (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Kırıkkale, Türkiye)
Clinical Dentistry and Research
3 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 72 - 78 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 20-01-2020

RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS

Öz:
Background and Aim: This study aimed to investigate theeffect of the rapid polymerization and etching procedure onmicroleakage scores of Class V restorations.Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were uniformlyprepared by one operator in 60 bovine incisors. The specimenswere randomly divided into six groups and restored as follows:Group 1: Selective enamel etching (SEE) + sixth-generationadhesive system (AS) + composite resin (CR) polymerizedat 3200 mW/cm2 for 6 s. Group 2: SEE + sixth-generationAS + CR polymerized at 1000 mW/cm2 for 20 s. Group 3: Noetching (NE) + sixth-generation AS + CR polymerized at 1000mW/cm2 for 20 s. Group 4: NE + sixth-generation AS + CRpolymerized at 3200 mW/cm2 for 6 s. Group 5: Total etching(TE) + fifth-generation AS + CR polymerized at 3200 mW/cm2for 6 s. Group 6: TE + fifth-generation AS + CR polymerized at1000 mW/cm2 for 20 s. After the thermal cycling procedure,all specimens were sectioned and microleakage scores wereevaluated by two operators. The data were analyzed usingKruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p= 0.05).Results: Gingival microleakage scores were found higherthan incisal microleakage scores (p<0.05). Results of themicroleakage test revealed that different cavity conditioningmethods, duration and power density of the light polymerizationprocedure significantly affected the microleakage rates at theincisal margins (p<0.05).Conclusion: SEE with the sixth-generation AS reducedmicroleakage. Rapid polymerization procedures can beperformed for small Class V cavities using the etch-and-rinsesystem and SEE procedure.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

HIZLI POLİMERİZASYON VE ASİTLEME PROSEDÜRLERİNİN SINIF V RESTORASYONLARININ MİKROSIZINTISINA ETKİSİ

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışma, Sınıf V restorasyonların mikrosızıntı skorları üzerine hızlı polimerizasyon ve asitleme prosedürlerinin etkisini araştırmayı amaçladı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Sınıf V kaviteler bir klinisyen tarafından atmış sığır kesici dişine aynı şekilde hazırlandı. Örnekler rastgele altı gruba ayrıldı ve şu şekilde restore edildi: Grup 1: Selektif mine asitlemesi + 6. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 3200mW/cm2 güçte 6 saniye polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Grup 2: Selektif mine asitlemesi + 6. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 1000mW/cm2 güçte 20sn polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Grup 3: Asitleme yok + 6. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 1000mW/cm2 güçte 20sn polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Grup 4: Asitleme yok + 6. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 3200mW/cm2 güçte 6sn polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Grup 5: Total asitleme + 5. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 3200mW/cm2 güçte 6sn polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Grup 6: Total asitleme + 5. jenerasyon adeziv sistem + 10000mW/cm2 güçte 20sn polimerize edilen kompozit rezin. Termal yaşlandırma sonrasında bütün örnekler ortadan ikiye bölündü ve mikrosızıntı değerleri iki araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirildi. Veriler Kruskal Wallis ve Mann Whitney U testleri kullanılarak SPSS 16.0 bilgisayar programında analiz edildi (p= 0.05). Bulgular: Gingival mikrosızıntı değerleri insizal mikrosızıntı değerlerinden daha fazla bulundu (p<0.05). Mikrosızıntı testi sonuçları, farklı kavite şartlandırma metotları ile ışıkla polimerizasyonda ışık gücü ve süresinin insizal kenarlarda mikrosızıntı skorlarını anlamlı derecede etkilediğini ortaya koydu (p<0.05). Sonuç: Altıncı jenerasyon adeziv sistem kullanıldığında selektif mine asitleme prosedürü mikrosızıntıyı azalttı. Hızlı polimerizasyon prosedürü küçük kavitelerde ‘Asitle ve Yıka’ grubu adeziv sistemlerle ve selektif mine asitlemesi prosedürü ile birlikte kullanılabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II Restorations with Different Tracers-Comparison with SEM Quantitative Analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 259-267.
  • Gamarra VSS, Borges GA, Junior LHB, Spohr AM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques. Odontology 2018; 106: 56-63.
  • Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 253-259.
  • Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 88-96.
  • Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resincomposites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 962-970.
  • Shimokawa CAK, Carneiro PMA, Lobo TR, Arana-Chavez VE, Youssef MN, Turbino ML. Five second photoactivation? A microhardness and marginal adaptation in vitro study in composite resin restorations. Int Dent J 2016; 66: 257-263.
  • Taubock TT, Feilzer AJ, Buchalla W, Kleverlaan CJ, Krejci I, Attin T. Effect of modulated photo-activation on polymerization shrinkage behavior of dental restorative resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2014; 122: 293-302.
  • Baek CJ, Hyun SH, Lee SK, Seol HJ, Kim HI, Kwon YH. The effects of light intensity and light-curing time on the degree of polymerization of dental composite resins. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 523-533.
  • Dennison JB, Yaman P, Seir R, Hamilton JC. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 499- 505.
  • Alkhudhairy FI. The effect of curing intensity on mechanical properties of different bulk-fill composite resins. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2017; 9: 1-6.
  • Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of lightcuring modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent 2004; 32: 247-254.
  • Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 303-308.
  • Arias VG, Campos IT, Pimenta LA. Microleakage study of three adhesive systems. Braz Dent J 2004; 15: 194-198.
  • Silveira de Araujo C, Incerti da Silva T, Ogliari FA, Meireles SS, Piva E, Demarco FF. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 26-33.
  • Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1117-1124.
  • Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 42-45.
  • Mazaheri R, Pishevar L, Shichani AV, Geravandi S. Effect of different cavity conditioners on microleakage of glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015; 12: 337-341.
  • Costa Pfeifer CS, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 197-202.
  • Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 59- 84.
  • Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Gunduz B. Degree of conversion of two lingual retainer adhesives cured with different light sources. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 173-179.
  • Nilgun Ozturk A, Usumez A, Ozturk B, Usumez S. Influence of different light sources on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 500-504.
  • Santos MJ, Souza Junior MH, Santos Junior GC, El-Mowafy O, Chedid Cavalcanti AP, Neme CF. Influence of light intensity and curing cycle on microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13: 193-197.
  • Marghalani HY. The influence of different light-curing modes on microleakage of posterior resin composites. J Adhes Sci Technol 2014; 28: 136-150.
  • Yilmaz F, Gonulol N, Guler E, Ersoz E, Aytac F. Effects of different light sources on microleakage of composite resins with different monomer structures. J Dent Sci 2014; 9: 364-370.
  • Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
  • Camargo EJd, Moreschi E, Baseggio W, Cury JA, Pascotto RC. Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 446-450.
  • Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 1089-1103.
APA Bayraktar Y, Hatırlı H (2019). RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. , 72 - 78.
Chicago Bayraktar Yusuf,Hatırlı Hüseyin RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. (2019): 72 - 78.
MLA Bayraktar Yusuf,Hatırlı Hüseyin RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. , 2019, ss.72 - 78.
AMA Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. . 2019; 72 - 78.
Vancouver Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. . 2019; 72 - 78.
IEEE Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H "RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS." , ss.72 - 78, 2019.
ISNAD Bayraktar, Yusuf - Hatırlı, Hüseyin. "RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS". (2019), 72-78.
APA Bayraktar Y, Hatırlı H (2019). RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 43(2), 72 - 78.
Chicago Bayraktar Yusuf,Hatırlı Hüseyin RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. Clinical Dentistry and Research 43, no.2 (2019): 72 - 78.
MLA Bayraktar Yusuf,Hatırlı Hüseyin RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol.43, no.2, 2019, ss.72 - 78.
AMA Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2019; 43(2): 72 - 78.
Vancouver Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2019; 43(2): 72 - 78.
IEEE Bayraktar Y,Hatırlı H "RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS." Clinical Dentistry and Research, 43, ss.72 - 78, 2019.
ISNAD Bayraktar, Yusuf - Hatırlı, Hüseyin. "RAPID POLYMERIZATION AND ETCHING PROCEDURE EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V RESTORATIONS". Clinical Dentistry and Research 43/2 (2019), 72-78.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
03-05-2024 14:21

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları