Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 91 - 96 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 İndeks Tarihi: 05-11-2019
Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment
Öz: Aim: The purpose of study is to assess the tensile strengthbetween porcelain teeth and two different denture base (polyamide and heat-polymerized acrylic), a repair material (auto-polymerizing acrylic) after different types of surface treatment.Materials and Methods: Total of 63 same form and colormandibular right first molar porcelain denture teeth wereused. The first molar porcelain denture teeth were separatedinto 3 material groups; Group 1: Heat-polymerized (HP), Group2: Autopolymerizing (AP), and Group 3: Polyamide (PA) (n=21).Then, all material groups were divided into 3 subgroups (n=7)representing different surface treatment method; Control, Airborne abrasion, Er: YAG laser. A universal testing machine wasused for determining the tensile bond strength (MPa) of theporcelain denture teeth to surface treated denture base andrepair materials. The crosshead speed was set of 0.5 mm/min.Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD was used for statically analyses (α=0.05). The effects of the surface treatmentwere observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: The polyamide (PA) has significantly higher(p< 0.05) tensile bond strength than the Heat-polymerized(HP) and Auto-polymerizing acrylic (AP). Polyamide (PA) withlaser surface treatment (9.89 MPa) showed highest tensilebond strength. The lowest tensile bond strength was determined control group (6.38 MPa) of auto-polymerizing (AP).Surface treatments showed no significant difference.Conclusion: Superior tensile strength was found polyamidedenture base and different surface treatments not affect thetensile strength of porcelain teeth.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Farklı yüzey işlemi uygulanan porselen dişler ve kaide-tamir materyalleri arasındaki gerilme kuvvetinin değerlendirilmesi
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, porselen protez dişelere uygulanan farklı yüzey işlemlerinden sonra iki farklı protez kaide (poliamid ve ısı ile polimerize akrilik) ve tamir materyali (otopolimerize akrilik) ile arasındaki gerilme kuvvetini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 63 adet aynı şekil ve renk mandibular sağ birinci molar porselen protez dişleri kullanıldı. Birinci molar porselen protez dişler 3 materyal grubuna ayrıldı; Grup 1: Isı polimerizasyonu (HP), Grup 2: Otopolimerize akrilik (AP) ve Grup 3: Poliamid (PA) (n=21). Daha sonra, tüm poselen dişler yüzey işleme yöntemine göre 3 alt gruba ayrıldı; Kontrol, Kumlama, Er: YAG lazer. Gerilme kuvveti (MPa) universal test makinesi kullanılarak (0.5 mm/dak) tespit edildi. Gerilme değerlerinin ortalama ve standart sapması hesaplandı ve tüm veriler two-way ANOVA ve post-hoc Tukey HSD ile analiz edildi. Güven aralığı α=0.05 olarak belirlendi. Yüzey işlemlerinin etkileri taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) ile incelendi. Bulgular: Poliamid kaide materyali diğer materyallere göre önemli derecede yüksek gerilme değeri sağladı (p<0,05). En yüksek gerilme değeri, lazer işlemi uygulanan porselen yüzeyler ile poliamid kaide materyali (9,89 MPa) arasında bulundu. En düşük gerilme değeri, otopolimerize akrilik tamir materyalinin kontrol grubu (6,38 MPa) olarak belirlendi. Uygulanan yüzey işlemleri istatiksel anlamlı bir fark göstermedi (p>0,05). Sonuç: En fazla gerilme kuvveti poliamid kaide materyalinde bulunmuştur. Farklı yüzey uygulamalarının porselen dişlerin gerilme değerlerini etkilemediği görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Matthews E, Smith DC. Nylon as a denture base material. Br Dent J 1955; 98: 231-237.
- Watt DM. Clinical assessment of nylon as a partial denture base material. Br Dent J 1955; 98: 238-244.
- Hallett GEM, Farrell JH. Nylon denture base. Dent Pract 1956; 6: 239-240.
- Hargreaves AS. Nylon as a denture-base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1971; 22: 122-128.
- Stafford GD, Huggett R, MacGregor AR, Graham J. The use of nylon as a denture-base material. J Dent 1986; 14: 18-22.
- Parvizi A et. al. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 83-89.
- Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 65-71.
- Katsumata Y et. al. Mechanical characterization of a flexible nylon denture base material. Bull Kanagawa Dent Col 2007; 35: 177-182.
- MacGregor AR, Graham J, Stafford GD, Huggett R. Recent experiences with denture polymers. J Dent 1984; 12: 146-157.
- Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 65-71.
- Craig RG. Prosthetic appliance of polymers. In: Robert G. Craig, John M. Powers, editors. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis; CV Mosby, 2002. p. 570-571.
- Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture-a survey. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 342-345.
- Sumithra N, Waknine S, Schulman A. Bond strength of etched porcelain denture teeth of PMMA. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 745-748.
- Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT, Bowen RL. Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J Am Dent Assoc 1967; 74: 1018-1023.
- Moffa JP, Jenkins WA, Weaver RG. Silane bonding of porcelain denture teeth to acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33: 620-627.
- Marchack BW, Yu Z, Zhao XY, White SN. Adhesion of denture tooth porcelain to heat-polymerized denture resin. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 242-249.
- Rached RN, Del-Bel Cury AA. Heat-cured acrylic resin repaired with microwave-cured one: bond strength and surface texture. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 370-375.
- Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 639-643.
- Shen C, Colaizzi FA, Birns B. Strength of denture repairs as influenced by surface treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 844-848.
- Rached RN, Powers JM, Del Bel Cury AA. Repair strength of autopolymerizing, microwave, and conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 79-82.
- Minami H, Suzuki S, Minesaki Y, Kurashige H, Tanaka T. In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on the bonding of autopolymeri zing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 164-170.
- Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 259-266.
- Meng GK, Chung KH, Fletcher-Stark ML, Zhang H. Effect of surface treatments and cyclic loading on the bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth with autopolymerized repair acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 245- 252.
- Rupp NW, Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC. Bonding cold-cure acrylic resins to acrylic resin teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 83: 601-606.
- Geerts G, Jooste CH. A comparison of the bond strengths of microwave- and water bath-cured denture material. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 406-409.
- Saavedra G et. al. Bond strength of acrylic teeth to denture base resin after various surface conditioning methods before and after thermocycling. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 199-201.
- Spratley MH. An investigation of the adhesion of acrylic resin to dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 389-392.
- Morrow RM, Matvias FM, Windeler AS, Fuchs RJ. Bonding of plastic teeth to two heat curing denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 565-568.
- Can G, Kansu G. An evaluation of the bond strength of plastic teeth to acrylic denture base materials. Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg 1990; 17: 97-101.
- Cardash HS, Liberman R, Helft M. The effect of retention grooves in acrylic resin teeth on tooth denture base bond. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 526-528.
- Cunningham JL, Benington IC. An investigation of variables which may affect the bond between plastic teeth and denture base resin. J Dent 1999; 27: 129-135.
- Chung KH, Chung CY, Chung CY, Chan DCN. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 268-275.
- Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Akin G, Ozdemir AK. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26: 783-788.
- Alkurt M, Yeşil Duymuş Z, Gündoğdu M. Effect of repair resin type and surface treatment on the repair strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111: 71-78.
- Gundogdu M, Yesil Duymus Z, Alkurt M. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 964-971.
| APA | ALKURT M, YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z, Gundogdu M (2018). Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. , 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| Chicago | ALKURT MURAT,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Gundogdu Mustafa Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. (2018): 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| MLA | ALKURT MURAT,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Gundogdu Mustafa Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. , 2018, ss.91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| AMA | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. . 2018; 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| Vancouver | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. . 2018; 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| IEEE | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M "Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment." , ss.91 - 96, 2018. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| ISNAD | ALKURT, MURAT vd. "Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment". (2018), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| APA | ALKURT M, YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z, Gundogdu M (2018). Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik, 14(2), 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| Chicago | ALKURT MURAT,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Gundogdu Mustafa Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik 14, no.2 (2018): 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| MLA | ALKURT MURAT,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Gundogdu Mustafa Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik, vol.14, no.2, 2018, ss.91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| AMA | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik. 2018; 14(2): 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| Vancouver | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment. 7tepe Klinik. 2018; 14(2): 91 - 96. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| IEEE | ALKURT M,YEŞİL DUYMUŞ Z,Gundogdu M "Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment." 7tepe Klinik, 14, ss.91 - 96, 2018. 10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
| ISNAD | ALKURT, MURAT vd. "Assessment of tensile strength between base-repair materials and porcelain teeth subjected to different surface treatment". 7tepe Klinik 14/2 (2018), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.5505/yeditepe.2018.70783 |
