Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 319 - 333 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231 İndeks Tarihi: 30-04-2020

Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması

Öz:
Çürük, travma, restorasyonlar, erozyon, atrizyon ve abrazyon gibi birçok faktöre bağlı olarak çok fazla madde kaybı olan ve endodontik tedavi sonrası daha da zayıflayan dişlerin nasıl restore edileceği her zaman bir sorun olmuştur. Endodontik tedavili dişlerin post ve kor sistemleri ilerestorasyonu diş hekimliği pratiğindeki en riskli işlemlerden biridir. Endodontik tedavi geçirmişbir dişin restoratif ve protetik tedavisi; kalan sağlıklı dokuların miktarına, uygulanan kor restorasyonunun prognozuna, kor yapısına destek olan post çeşidine ve post yüzeyine tutuculuğu artırmaya yönelik yapılacak işlemlere, restorasyonun genel olarak yapısal ve estetik kalitesi ile, klinikadaptasyonuna bağlıdır. Günümüzde estetik beklentilerin artması ve adezif sistemlerin gelişmesiyle birlikte post-kor sistemlerinin seçenekleri artmıştır. Giderek artan estetik ve biyolojik olarakuyumlu maddelere olan talep, metal olmayan post-kor sistemlerinin geliştirilmesine yol açmıştır.Fiberle güçlendirilmiş sistemler daha çok kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, restorasyonların ağızda kalma oranı ve en yaygın başarısızlık tipleri açısından, döküm post kor ve fiber postlarile ilgili retrospektif ve prospektif klinik çalışmalar gözden geçirilmiştir. İlave olarak yüzey işlemlerinin post sistemlerinin retansiyon başarısı üzerine etkileri ve yeni bir post-kor sistem olan yüksek performanslı polimer polyetherketoneketonesin üzerinde durulmuştur. Bu çalışmada, maddekaybı çok fazla olan endodontik tedavili dişlere uygulayacağımız tedaviye karar vermekte diş hekimlerine yardımcı olunması amaçlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Contemporary Classification of Post-Core Systems

Öz:
It has always been a problem to restore teeth that have lost too much tissue due to many factors such as caries, trauma, previous restorations, erosion, attrition and abrasion, and even weakened after endodontic treatment. The restoration of endodontically treated teeth with postcore systems is one of the most risky procedure in dental practice. Restorative and prosthetic treatment of a tooth that has undergone endodontic treatment generally depends on the amount of remaining healthy tissue, the prognosis of the applied core restoration, and the clinical adaptation of the restoration with structural and aesthetic qualities. Nowadays, with the increase of aesthetic expectations and the development of adhesive systems, the choice of post-core systems has increased. Demand for increasingly aesthetically and biologically compatible materials has led to the development of non-metallic post-core systems. Fiber-reinforced systems have started to be incorporated into routine clinical care more frequently. In this survey, retrospective and prospective clinical studies dealing with cast-post-and core and fiber posts were reviewed regarding the rate of survival of restorations and the most prevalent failures. In addition, the impacts of surface treatments on the retention success of post systems and a new post core sysytem named high performance polyetherketoneketones have been mentioned. The aim of this review; was to assist dentists in deciding the treatment to be applied to endodontically treated teeth with too much substance loss.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46(2): 367-84. [Crossref]
  • 2. Tait CM, Ricketts DN, Higgins AJ. Restoration of the root-filled tooth: pre-operative assessment. Br Dent J. 2005;198(7):395-404. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 3. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(4):458-67. [Crossref]
  • 4. Ahmetoğlu F, Şimşek N, Yıldırım G, Polat MT. [Post materials in restoration of endodontically treated teeth]. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2014;24(1):153-7.
  • 5. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30(5):289- 301. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 6. Mitsui FH, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA, Ferraresi PM. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(8):612-6.
  • 7. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28(1):12-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 8. Johnson W. Diagnosis of pulpal and periradicular pathosis. Color Atlas of Endodontics. 1st ed. Pennsylvania, USA: W.B. Saunders Co; 2002. p.11.
  • 9. Isidor F, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5(3):257-61.
  • 10. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(6):556-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 11. Lloyd PM, Palik JF. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(1):32-6. [Crossref]
  • 12. Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW Jr, Hassell KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(6):785- 9. [Crossref]
  • 13. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(6):676-8. [Crossref]
  • 14. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(2):155-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 15. Junge T, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Load fatigue of compromised teeth: a comparison of 3 luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(6):558-64.
  • 16. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(12):882-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 17. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. J Dent. 2005;33(4):305-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 18. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: characteristics and clinical applications. Roma: Ed Masson; 2002.
  • 19. Schneider RL. A one-appointment procedure for cast post and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(4):420-2. [Crossref]
  • 20. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(1):11-6. [Crossref]
  • 21. Uzun İH, Bayındır F. [The properties of titanium and it's usage in dental practice]. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2010;20(2):213-20.
  • 22. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod. 1998;24(12):807-10. [Crossref]
  • 23. Naumann M, Sterzenbac G, Alexandra F, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: preliminary results after up to 3 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(5):499-503. 24. Drummond JL. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):5B-8B.
  • 25. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(2):173-8.
  • 26. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):431-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 27. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):9B-13B.
  • 28. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(2):151-7. [Crossref]
  • 29. Çökük DN. [Application of esthetic posts in endodontically treated teeth]. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2009;19(2):124-30.
  • 30. Bilgin MS, Öztürk AN. [Aesthetic post systems]. SÜ Diş Hek Fak Der. 2008;17(3):243-5.
  • 31. Freedman G. The carbon fibre post: metalfree, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health. 1996;86(2):23-6, 29-30.
  • 32. King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(8): 785-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 33. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts--a prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66(11):613-8.
  • 34. Bavbek AB, Korkmaz T, Yılmaz C. [Mechanical spect of fiber reinforced composite posts]. GÜ Diş Hek Fac Derg. 2007;24(3):187-92.
  • 35. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):29-36. [Crossref]
  • 36. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater. 1992;8(3):197-202. [Crossref]
  • 37. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):15B-8B.
  • 38. Başaran EG. [Post systems from past to present]. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2013;2013(Suppl 7):150-6.
  • 39. Eskitaşcıioğlu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod. 2002;28(9):629-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 40. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54(4):543-7. [Crossref]
  • 41. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior translucent-fiber posts: a 2- year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(6):593-6.
  • 42. Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, MeyerLueckel H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(4):432-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 43. Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts- -clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1557-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 44. Rosato DV, Rosato DV. Reinforced Plastics Handbook. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004. p.1082.
  • 45. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(1):39-44.
  • 46. Uzun G, Keyf F. [An alternative to conventional post-core systems: polyethylene fiber post]. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;31(2):43-8.
  • 47. Miller TE. A new material for periodontal splinting and orthodontic retention. Compendium. 1993;14(6):800, 802.
  • 48. Macpherson LC, Smith BG. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: an in-vitro study. Br Dent J. 1995;178(9):341-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 49. Trope M, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin. J Endod. 1991;17(6):257-9. [Crossref]
  • 50. Piovesan EM, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced custom posts and cores: a 97-month study. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(6):633-9.
  • 51. Karna JC. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent. 1996;9(5): 230-2.
  • 52. Isidor F, Odman P, Brøndum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9(2):131-6.
  • 53. Ivoclar A. Scientific Documentation. Cosmopost/Ips Empress Cosmo Ingot, Schaan, Liechteinstein; 1998.
  • 54. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay F, Ferrari M. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2- year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(3): 293-8.
  • 55. Ottl P, Hahn L, Lauer HCh, Fay M. Fracture characteristics of carbon fibre, ceramic and non-palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(2):175-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 56. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: the state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(6):383-92.
  • 57. Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7(2):73- 80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 58. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-and-core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(5):625-9. [Crossref]
  • 59. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J. 1996;29(4):262-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] 60. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Retention of selected core materials to zirconia posts. Oper Dent. 2002;27(5):455-61.
  • 61. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(6):624-8. [Crossref]
  • 62. Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Kosmac T, Funduk N, Marion L. Fracture resistance and reliability of new zirconia posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(4):342-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 63. Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjögren G. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro. Br Dent J. 2003;195(3):155-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 64. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48(2):397-416. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 65. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent. 2000;25(3):223-7.
  • 66. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(7):595-601. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 67. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Ross M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. Peek surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 68. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):357-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 69. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27(3):324-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 70. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. Peek biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845-69. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 71. Schwitalla A, Müller WD. Peek dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(6):743-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 72. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA. A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function. Implant Dent. 2008;17(1):51-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 73. Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE, Lee WC, Shin SW, Lee JY. Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post-core system: a 3D finite element analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:137127. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 74. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores--a review. Quintessence Int. 2005;36(9):737-46.
  • 75. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res. 2007;86(8):729-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 76. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent. 2007;35(10):778-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 77. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(6):519-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 78. Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J. 2003;195(1):43-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 79. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Albaladejo A, Aguilera FS, Ferrari M, Tay FR, et al. Effects of adhesive systems and luting agents on bonding of fiber posts to root canal dentin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2006;77(1):195-200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 80. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(2):153-62.
  • 81. Bell AM, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent. 2005;33(7):533-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 82. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(3):218-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 83. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR, et al. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J. 2006;39(1):31-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 84. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):283-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 85. Uludamar A, Akalin B, Ozkan YK. [Surface preparations of zirconia based full ceramic restorations before cementation]. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2011;14(2):140-53.
  • 86. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent Mater. 2006;22(7):602-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 87. Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent. 2004;29(1):60-8.
  • 88. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Toledano M, Goracci C, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Improving the quality of the quartz fiber postcore bond using sodium ethoxide etching and combined silane/adhesive coupling. J Endod. 2006;32(5):447-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 89. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Sadek FT, Goracci C, Ferrari M. A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. J Endod. 2006;32(1):44- 7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 90. Nagai E, Otani K, Satoh Y, Suzuki S. Repair of denture base resin using woven metal and glass fiber: effect of methylene chloride pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(5):496- 500. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 91. Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2005;21(7):616-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 92. Spohr AM, Borges GA, Júnior LH, Mota EG, Oshima HM. Surface modification of in-ceram zirconia ceramic by Nd:YAG laser, Rocatec system, or aluminum oxide sandblasting and its bond strength to a resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008;26(3):203-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 93. Mosharraf R, Ranjbarian P. Effects of post surface conditioning before silanization on bond strength between fiber post and resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(2):126-32. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
  • 94. Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, Bonachela WC. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(3):224-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 95. Yenisey M, Kulunk S. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(1):38-45. [Crossref]
  • 96. Elsaka SE. Influence of chemical surface treatments on adhesion of fiber posts to composite resin core materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29(5):550-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 97. Külünk Ş, Yenisey M, Öztaş DD, Çağrı U. [Effect of different chemical surface treatment on the bond strength of composite resin to glass fiber and quartz fiber post surfacez]. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg. 2008;9(3):83-8.
  • 98. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent. 2009;37(11):848-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 99. Cavalcanti AN, Pilecki P, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Gianinni M, et al. Evaluation of the surface roughness and morphologic features of Y-TZP ceramics after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(3):473-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 100. Foxton RM, Cavalcanti AN, Nakajima M, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, Melo L, et al. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(2):84-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  • 101. Akyil MS, Yilmaz A, Karaalioğlu OF, Duymuş ZY. Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(4):539-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]
APA AYDEMİR M, BAĞLAR S (2019). Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. , 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
Chicago AYDEMİR MERVE,BAĞLAR SERDAR Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. (2019): 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
MLA AYDEMİR MERVE,BAĞLAR SERDAR Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. , 2019, ss.319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
AMA AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. . 2019; 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
Vancouver AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. . 2019; 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
IEEE AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S "Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması." , ss.319 - 333, 2019. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
ISNAD AYDEMİR, MERVE - BAĞLAR, SERDAR. "Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması". (2019), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
APA AYDEMİR M, BAĞLAR S (2019). Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(3), 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
Chicago AYDEMİR MERVE,BAĞLAR SERDAR Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 25, no.3 (2019): 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
MLA AYDEMİR MERVE,BAĞLAR SERDAR Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.25, no.3, 2019, ss.319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
AMA AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 25(3): 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
Vancouver AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 25(3): 319 - 333. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
IEEE AYDEMİR M,BAĞLAR S "Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması." Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 25, ss.319 - 333, 2019. 10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231
ISNAD AYDEMİR, MERVE - BAĞLAR, SERDAR. "Post-Kor Sistemlerinin Güncel Sınıflandırılması". Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 25/3 (2019), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2017-57231