Yıl: 2008 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 159 - 165 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, topluma dayalı bir örneklemde metabolic sendrom (MES) prevelansını Uluslararası Diyabet Federasyonu (IDF) ve Erişkin Tedavi Paneli III (ATP1İI) tanımları temelinde karşılaştırmak ve iki tanımın uyumunu araştırmaktır. Yöntem ve Gereç: Çalışmaya Batı Anadolu'daki kırsal bir kasabada ev halkı tespit fişlerinden sistematik olarak seçilen 20 yaş ve üzerindeki 244 yetişkin alındı. Tanımlar arasındaki uyum Kappa test ile araştırıldı. Bulgular: Grubun yaş ortalaması 46,9 ± 14,9 yıldı. MES prevalansi ATPIII ve IDF tanımlarına göre sırasıyla % 38,1 ve % 41,4 olarak saptandı ve hem erkek hem de bayanlarda 50 yaş üzerinde MES prevaiansında artış gözlendi (P < 0,001). ATPIII ve IDF tanımlarına göre grubun sırasıyla sadece % 9,8'i ve % 6,3'ü hiçbir kriteri taşımıyordu. IDF ve ATPIII tanımları arasındaki uyum oranı % 91,1 ± % 0,04 (Kappa = 0,812) olarak bulundu. Sadece ATPIII ile MES tanısı alan ancak IDF tanımına göre MES olmayanların hepsi erkekti ve vücut kitle indeksleri ile bel çevreleri her iki tanım ile de MES saptananlardan daha düşüktü. Sonuç: Metabolik sendrom prevalansi bölgemizde yüksektir ve iki tanım arasında iyi bir uyum bulunmaktadır. IDF tanımının zayıf ancak metabolik unsurları bozuk olan erkekleri saptamada yetersiz kalabileceği akılda tutulmalıdır. Bu sendroma yönelik olarak tarama, önleme ve tadavi girişimlerinin acilen organize edilmesi gerekli görünmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Metabolik sendrom X Yaş dağılımı Türkiye Kırsal nüfus Yaygınlık Cinsiyet dağılımı

Konular: Cerrahi

Türkiye'de kırsal bir alanda metabolik sendrom prevelansı: iki tanı kriterinin karşılaştırılması ve uyumu

Öz:
Aim: This study was performed to compare the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MES) according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP11I) definitions in a population-based sample and to determine the concordance of the definitions. Materials and Methods: A total of 244 adults aged >20 years (145 women and 99 men), selected systematically from household registration cards in a rural village in West Anatolia, were analyzed. Kappa test was done to examine the agreement between the definitions. Results: The mean age of the group was 46.9 ± 14.9 years. The prevalence of MES using ATP1I1 and IDF definitions was 38.1% and 41.4%, respectively. MES prevalence increased with age 50 in both genders using both criteria (P < 0.001). Only 9.8% and 6.3% of the population had none of the components of MES according to ATP11I and IDF, respectively. The agreement rate between the IDF and ATP1II was 91.1% ± 0.04% (Kappa = 0.812). The subjects defined only with ATPI11 and not IDF were all men and had lower body mass index and waist circumference than those defined by both ATPIII and IDF. Conclusions: The MES was common among our population using either ATPIII or IDF definition. The agreement between the two definitions was good. The insufficiency of IDF definition for detecting leaner but metabolically abnormal men should be kept in mind. Screening, prevention and treatment interventions for this syndrome seem to be organized promptly.
Anahtar Kelime: Metabolic Syndrome X Age Distribution Turkey Rural Population Prevalence Sex Distribution

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Fteaven GM. Banting Lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988; 37: 1595-607.
  • 2. Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, Niskanen LK, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT, Lakka TA. Metabolic syndrome and development of diabetes mellitus: application and validation of recently suggested definitions of the metabolic syndrome in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:1070-7.
  • 3. Lorenzo C, Okoloise M, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM. The metabolic syndrome as predictor of type 2 diabetes: the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3153-9.
  • 4. Resnick HE, Jones K, Ruotolo G, Jain ÂK, Henderson J, Lu W et al. Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 861-7.
  • 5. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA 2002; 288: 2709-16.
  • 6. Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Pyorola K; DECODE Study Group. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1066-76.
  • 7. Onat A, Hergenç G, Can G. Prospective validation in identical Turkish cohort of two metabolic syndrome definitions for predicting cardiometabolic risk and selection of most appropriate definition. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2007; 7: 29-34.
  • 8. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome - a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med 2006; 23:469-80.
  • 9. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001, 285: 2486-97.
  • 10. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample size determination in health studies: a practical manual. Geneva: World Health Organization;1991.
  • 11. NHBLI Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: clinical guidelines on identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 1998; 6: 51S-209S.
  • 12. Son le NT, Kunii D, Hung NT, Sakai T, Yamamoto S. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and risk factors in the urban population of Ho Chi Minh City. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 67: 243-50.
  • 13. Kozan 0, Oguz A, Abaci A, Erol C, Ongen Z, Temizhan A, Çelik S. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Turkish adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 548-53.
  • 14. Harzallah F, Alberti H, Ben Khalifa F. The metabolic syndrome in an Arab population: a first look at the new International Diabetes Federation criteria. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 441-4.
  • 15. DECODA Study Group. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in populations of Asian origin. Comparison of the IDF definition with the ATPI11 definition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 76: 57-67.
  • 16. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Satyavani K, Sivasankari S, Vijay V. Metabolic syndrome in urban Asian Indian adults—a population study using modified ATP 111 criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 60: 199-204.
  • 17. Onat A. Lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins among Turks, and impact on coronary heart disease. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2004; 4: 236-45.
  • 18. Kim ES, Han SM, Kim YI, Song KH, Kim MES, Kim WB et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome in a rural population of South Korea. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 1141-3.
  • 19. Athyros VG, Bouloukos VI, Pehlivanidis AN, Papageorgiou AA, Dionysopoulou SG, Symeonidis AN et al; MetS-Greece Collaborative Group. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Greece: the MetS-Greece Multicentre Study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005; 7: 397-405.
  • 20. Thomas GN, Ho SY, Janus ED, Lam KS, Hedley AJ, Lam TH: Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study Steering Committee. The US National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel 111 (NCEP ATP 111) prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 67: 251-7.
  • 21. J0rgensen ME, Bjerregaard P, Gyntelberg F, Borch-Johnsen K; Greenland Population Study. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among the Inuit in Greenland. A comparison between two proposed definitions. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 1237-42.
  • 22. Ko GT, Cockram CS, Chow CC, Yeung V, Chan WB, So WY et al. High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Hong Kong Chinesecomparison of three diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 69: 160-8.
  • 23.Khader Y, Bateiha A, El-Khateeb M, Al-Shaikh A, Ajlouni K. High prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Northern Jordanians. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21: 214-9.
  • 24.Onat A, Sansoy V. Metabolic syndrome, major culprit of coronary disease among Turks: its prevalence and impact on coronary risk. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2002; 30: 8-15 (article in Turkish).
  • 25.Onat A, Ceyhan K, Başar O, Erer B, Toprak S, Sansoy V. Metabolic syndrome: major impact on coronary risk in a population with low cholesterol levels~a prospective and cross-sectional evaluation. Atherosclerosis 2002; 165: 285-92.
  • 26.Zabetian A, Hadaegh F, Azizi F. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranian adult population, concordance between the IDF with the ATPI11 and the WHO definitions. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 77: 251-7.
  • 27.Ko GT, Cockram CS, Chow CC, Yeung VT, Chan WB, So WY et al. Metabolic syndrome by the international diabetes federation definition in Hong Kong Chinese. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006; 73: 58-64.
  • 28.Choi KM, Kim SM, Kim YE, Choi DS, Baik SH, Lee J; International Diabetes Federation. Prevalence and cardiovascular disease risk of the metabolic syndrome using National Cholesterol Education Program and International Diabetes Federation definitions in the Korean population. Metabolism 2007; 56: 552-8.
  • 29.Yoon YS, Lee ES, Park C, Lee S, Oh SW. The new definition of metabolic syndrome by the international diabetes federation is less likely to identify metabolically abnormal but non-obese individuals than the definition by the revised national cholesterol education program: the Korea N HAN ES study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007:31:528-34.
APA GEMALMAZ A, AYDIN S, Basak O, DİŞÇİGİL G, KURUL A (2008). Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. , 159 - 165.
Chicago GEMALMAZ AYFER,AYDIN Serpil,Basak Okay,DİŞÇİGİL Güzel,KURUL Aslıhan Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. (2008): 159 - 165.
MLA GEMALMAZ AYFER,AYDIN Serpil,Basak Okay,DİŞÇİGİL Güzel,KURUL Aslıhan Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. , 2008, ss.159 - 165.
AMA GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. . 2008; 159 - 165.
Vancouver GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. . 2008; 159 - 165.
IEEE GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A "Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria." , ss.159 - 165, 2008.
ISNAD GEMALMAZ, AYFER vd. "Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria". (2008), 159-165.
APA GEMALMAZ A, AYDIN S, Basak O, DİŞÇİGİL G, KURUL A (2008). Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(2), 159 - 165.
Chicago GEMALMAZ AYFER,AYDIN Serpil,Basak Okay,DİŞÇİGİL Güzel,KURUL Aslıhan Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 38, no.2 (2008): 159 - 165.
MLA GEMALMAZ AYFER,AYDIN Serpil,Basak Okay,DİŞÇİGİL Güzel,KURUL Aslıhan Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.38, no.2, 2008, ss.159 - 165.
AMA GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008; 38(2): 159 - 165.
Vancouver GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008; 38(2): 159 - 165.
IEEE GEMALMAZ A,AYDIN S,Basak O,DİŞÇİGİL G,KURUL A "Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 38, ss.159 - 165, 2008.
ISNAD GEMALMAZ, AYFER vd. "Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a rural Turkish population: comparison and concordance of two diagnostic criteria". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 38/2 (2008), 159-165.