Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri

Necla EKİNCİ (Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
18 9

Proje Grubu: SBB Sayfa Sayısı: 259 Proje No: 104K094 Proje Bitiş Tarihi: 01.05.2008 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Psikoloji
Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abouserie, R., Self esteem and achievement motivation as determinants of students approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 20, 1, 19-27, (1995).
  • Andaç, D., Relationship between school caharecteristics and approaches to learning. Eğitim ve Bilim, 28, 127, 57-63, (2003).
  • Au, C. ve Entwistle, N., Memorisation with understanding in approaches to studying: cultural variant or response to assessment demands? Paper Presented At The European Association For Research On Learning And Instruction Conference (Gothenburg, August), (1999). http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001728.htm (Erişim: 7 Nisan 2005).
  • Berberoğlu, G. ve Hei, L. M., A comparison of university students’ approaches to learning across taiwan and turkey. International Journal Of Testing, 3 (2), 173-187, (2003).
  • Bernardo. A. B. I., Approaches to learning and academic achievement of filipino students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, March, 164, 1, (2003).
  • Biggs, J., Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381-394, (1979).
  • Biggs, J., Teaching for quality learning at university. London: Open University Press., (1999).
  • Biggs, J., Enchancing Learning: A Matter of Style or Aproach?. R. J. Stenberg, Zhang, L (edt). Perspectives on Tjinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. London: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Publishers, (2001).
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayıncılık, (2003). Pp:120.
  • Cashin,W. E. ve Downey, R. G., Disciplinary differences in what is taught and in students' perceptions of what they learn and of how they are taught. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64, 81-92, (1995).
  • Chambers, E., Workload and the quality of student learning. Studie in Higher Education, 17, 2, 141-154, (1992).
  • Chou, T.F., Taylor, D.W. ve Su, H., The effects of learning tendencies, learning approaches and learning habits on academic achievement: evidence from taiwanese college accounting studuents. K. Martin, N. Stanley ve N Davison (Eds), Teaching in the Disciplines/ Learning in Context Teaching and Learning Forum 99, (1999). (pp. 76–83), www.http//1sn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1999/chou.html (Erişim: 15 Mayıs 2006).
  • Clarke, R. M., Students’ aproaches to studying in an innovative medical school: a cros sectional study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 309-321, (1986).
  • Coles, C.R., Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students’ approaches to studying Medical Education, 19,:308-309, (1985).
  • Cuthbert, P. F., The student learning process: learning styles or learning approaches. Teaching in Higher education, 10, 2, 235-249, (2005).
  • Çetin, Ş., Üniversite öğrencilerinin kopya çekme davranışlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Millî Eğitim, 175, 129-141, (2007).
  • Dahlgren, L.O. ve Marton, F., Students conceptions of subject matter: an aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3, 25-35, (1978).
  • Davidson, R. A., Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 29–44, (2002).
  • Demirel, Ö., Öğretimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme: Öğretme Sanatı. 11. Baskı. Ankara: PegemA yayıncılık, (2007). Pp: 43.
  • Demirel, Ö., Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. 3. Baskı. Ankara: PegemA yayıncılık, (2000). Pp:137
  • Demirören, M., Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. (Yükseklisans Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, (2005).
  • DİE. İl Merkezlerinin Nüfus Büyüklüğüne Göre Sıralanışı ve Yıllık Nifus Artış Hızı. http://www.die.gov.tr/nufus/02012002T4.jpg (Erişim 12 Ocak 2005).
  • Diseth, A., Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. Europe Journal of Personality, 17, 143-155, (2003).
  • Diseth, A., Student evaluatıon of teachıng , approaches to learnıng and academics achievement. Scandinavian Jouranl of Educational Research,51, 2, 185-204, (2007).
  • Donald J. ve Jackling, B., Student Characteristics and Approaches to Learning: A Cross-Cultural Study. Meyers, N.M., Smith, B.N., Bingham, S.A. and Shimeld, S.F. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second Innovation in Accounting and Corporate Governance Education Conference. 31 January – 2 February. Hobart, Tasmania,(2007). www.utas.edu.au/business/faculty/conference/abstracts/John_Donald.htm. (Erişim: 8 Mart 2008)
  • Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K. ve Ferguson, J., The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907–1920, (2004).
  • Ediger, M., Learning opportunities in the higher education curriculum. College Student Journal, 35, 3, 410-418, (2001).
  • Ekinci, N. ve Ekinci, E., HÜ. İlköğretim bölümü öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. I. Ulusal İlköğretim Kongresi. 15-17 Kasım. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi, (2007).
  • Ekinci, E. ve Burgaz, B., Hacettepe üniversitesi öğrencilerinin bazı akademik hizmetlere ilişkin beklenti ve memnuniyet düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, (2007).
  • Eklund-Myrskog, G., Students‘ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35, 3, 299-316, (1998).
  • Entwistle, N. J., Hounsell, C. J., Macaulay, C., Situnayake, G. ve Tait, H., The Performance of Electrical Engineers in Scottish Education. Report to the Scottish Education Department, Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, Department of Education, University of Edinburgh, (1989).
  • Entwistle,N., Mccune, V. ve Hounsell, J., Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: concepts, measures and preliminary findings. ETL Project Occasional Report, No. 1. www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html (2002). (Erişim: 10 Nisan 2005).
  • Entwistle, N., Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194 (1990).
  • Entwistle, N., Approaches and study skills ınventory for students. center for research on learning and instruction. University of Edinburgh. www.ed.ac.uk.uk/etl/questionnaireASSIST (1997). (Erişim: 22. Temmuz 2005).
  • Entwistle, N., Approaches to learning and levels of understanding Influences and responsibilities. http://www.ucd.ie/lsu/Entwhistle.pdf (TY). (Erişim: 2 Şubat 2008).
  • Entwistle, N., Learning and studying: contrasts and influences. www.newhorizons.org/future/Creating_the_Future/crfut_entwistle.htm. (TY). (Erişim: 14 Haziran 2006).
  • Entwistle, N. J. ve Entwistle., AContrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implications. .Higher Education. 22, 205-227, (1991).
  • Entwistle, N. ve Ramsden, P., Understanding Student Learning. London: Nichols Publishing Company, (1983).
  • Entwistle, N. ve Tait, H., Approaches to learning evaluationsof teaching and preferences for contrasting environments, Higher Education, 19, 169-194, (1990).
  • Entwistle, N., Tait, H. ve McCune, V., Patterns of response to approaches to studying inventory across constracting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XV, 1, 33-48, (2000).
  • Enwistle, N., Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes,. 30(5/6), 593-602, (2001).
  • Enwistle, N. ve Tait, H., Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64 , 93- 103, (1995).
  • Fransson, A., On qualitative differences ın learning: IV. effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic text anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244-257, (1977).
  • Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. ve Marshall, S., A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. Heather Fry at al (ed). Understanding Student Learning. London. Kogan Page, (2003). Pp: 18-19
  • Gijbels, D. ve F. Dochy., Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32, 4, 401–11, (2006).
  • Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F. ve Bossche, P., The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and learning outcomes, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 4, 327–341, (2005).
  • Gow, L. ve Kember, D., Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education,19,307–322, (1990).
  • Gulikers ,J. T.M., Bastiaens, T.J., Kirscher ,P. A. ve Kester, L., Relations between student perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approaches and learning outcome. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 381-400, (2006).
  • Güriz , K., Şuhubi, E., Şengör, C., Türker, K. ve Yurtsever, E., Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim bilim ve teknoloji. TÜSİAD Yayınları: İstanbul, (1994).
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim-Öğretim Sınav Yönetmeliği http://www.hun.edu.tr/ortak/universite/onlisanslisansyonetmelik.pdf (Erişim: 15 Nisan 2008).
  • Hayes, K. ve Richardson, T.E.J., Gender, subject and context as determınants of approaches to studying in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, June, 20, 2, 215-222, (1995).
  • Heintström, J. The impact of personality an approahes to learning on information behavıor. Information Research, 5, 3, (2000). http://informationr.net/ir/5– 3/paper78.html (Erişim: 17 Haziran 2006)
  • Hekkila, A. ve Lonka, K., Studying in higher education : students approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 1, 99-117, (2006).
  • Hounsell, D. J., Learning and essay writing, in: F. Marton , D Hounsell ve N.Entwistle (ed) The Experience Of Learning. Edinburgh: Scoottish Academic, (1997).
  • Jackson, B., Assesment practices in art and design: a contribution to student learning? Graham Gibbs (Ed).Improving Student Learning Assessment and Evaluation Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, (1994).
  • Jansen, E. P. W.A ve Bruinsma, M., Explaining achievement in higher education. Educational Research and Evaluation,11, 3, 235-252, (2005).
  • Kavak, Y., Kalkınmadaki Öncelikli Yörelerdeki Yükseköğretim Kurumlarının Çevreye Dönük Faaliyetleri. Ankara: TOBB Yayını, (1990). Pp:24.
  • Kember, D., Interpreting student workload and the factors whicshape students perceptions’ of their workload. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 2, 165-184, (2004).
  • Kember, D. ve Harper, G., Approaches to studying research and its implications for the quality of learning from distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 16, 35-46, (1987).
  • Kember, D. ve Sandra, N.G., An examination of the interrelationshiop between workloud study time an academics outcome. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 3, (1996).
  • Kember, D., Jamieson, Q.W., Pomfret, M. ve Wong, E.T.T., Learning approaches study time and academic performance. Higher Education, 29,329-343, (1995).
  • Kember, D., ve Leung, D. Y. P., Influences upon students' perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18, 3, 293-308, (1998).
  • Kirschner; P., Meester, M., Middelbeek, E. ve Hermans, H., Agreement between student expectations, experiences and actual objectives of practicals in the natural sciences at the Open university of the Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 2, 175-197, (1993).
  • Korkut, H., Öğretim Üyelerinin Pedagojik Formasyon Gereksinimleri. 25-27 Kasım Eğitimde Yansımalar:V, 21. Yüzyılın Eşliğinde Türk Eğitim Sistemi Ulusal Sempozyumu, Ankara: Başkent Öğretmen Evi, (1999) pp: 280-293.
  • Kreber, C., The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: a Canadian experience. Higher Education and Development, 22, 57–70, (2003).
  • Laurillard, D., Styles and approaches to problem solving, in: F. Marton , D HOUnsell ve N:Entwistle (ed) The experience of learning . Edinburgh:Scoottish Academic Press, (1997). Pp: 126-144.
  • Lawless, C. ve Richardson, J. T. E., Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257-282, (2002).
  • Lonka, K. ve Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5-24, (1996).
  • Mahiroğlu, A., İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik formasyon programları ile yetiştirilmesinde görev alan öğretim elemanlarının öğretmenlik davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Yansımalar:IV, Cumhuriyetin 75. Yılında ilköğretim 1.Ulusal Sempozyumu Ankara: Başkent Öğretmen Evi, (1998) pp: 73-80.
  • Marshall, D. ve Case, J., Approaches to learning’ research in higher education: a response to Haggis. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 2, 257–267, (2007).
  • Marton, F. ve Saljo, R., On the qualitative differences in learning. II outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 :115–127, (1976b).
  • Marton, F. ve Saljo, R., Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell ve N. Entwistle (ed) The experience of learning (edinburgh Scoottish Academic Press), (1997). Pp: 39-58.
  • Marton, F. ve Saljo, R., On qualitative differences in learning. I outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11, (1976a).
  • McCune, V., Promoting high-quality learning: perspectives from the ETL project. www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html (2004). (Erişim: 13 Şubat 2005).
  • Mehlinger, H., School reform and the information age. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 6, 405- 406, (1996).
  • Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim-Öğretim Sınav Yönetmeliği http://tarsusmyo.mersin.edu.tr/images/egitimogretimyonetmeligi.doc (Erişim: 15 Nisan 2008).
  • Meyer, J.H.F. ve Muller, M. W., Evaluating the quality of student learning . I-an unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual level. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 2, 131–152, (1990).
  • Newbell, D.I ve Jaeger, K., The effect of assesment and examinations on the learning of medical student. Medical Education, 1, 165-71, (1983).
  • Newble, D. I. ve Entwistle, N. J., Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education. Medical Education, 20, 162–17, (1986).
  • Newble, D. ve Gordon, M.I., The learning style of medical students. Medical Education, 19, 3-8, (1985).
  • Newble, D.I. ve Clarke, R.M., The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in an innovative problem based medical school. Medical education, 20, 4, 267- 273, (1985).
  • Özvarış, Ş. B. ve Demirel, Ö., Öğrenen Merkezli Tıp Eğitimi Eğitici Rehberi. İstanbul: Türk Tabibler Birliği, (2002). Pp:44, 50.
  • Parry, S., Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses. Higher Education, 3, 273- 299, (1998).
  • Pimparyon, P., Caleer, S.M., Pemba, S. ve Roff, S., Educational environment, student approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing School. Medical Teacher, 22, 4, 359-364, (2000).
  • Premuzic, C. T. ve Furnham, A., Persaonality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 7, 1596-1603, (2008).
  • Prosser, M. ve Trigwell, K., Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press, (1999).
  • Ramsden, P., Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8,:411-427, (1979).
  • Ramsden, P., İmproving teaching and learning in higher education :the case for a relational perspective , Studies In Higher Education, 12, 3, 275-86, (1987).
  • Ramsden, P., The context of learning in academic departmnets. In F. Marton, D Hounsell ve N.Entwistle (ed) The Experience Of Learning. Edinburgh: Scoottish Academic Press, (1997). Pp: 198-216.
  • Ramsden, P., Learnig to Teaching in Higher Education. London: Newyork Routhladge Falmer, (2000).
  • Ramsden, P. ve Entwistle, N.J., Effects of academic departments on students approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–83, (1981).
  • Reid, W. A., Duvall, E. ve Evans, P., Relationship between assessment results and approaches to learning and studying in year two medical students. Medical Education; 41, 8, 754-762, (2007).
  • Reynolds, M., Learning Styles: a critique. Management Learning, 28, 2, 115-133, (1997).
  • Rhem, J., Deep/surface approaches to learning: an introduction. The National Teachıng & Learnıng Forum, 5, 1, 1-5, (1995).
  • Richardson, J. T. E., Students’ perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 7-27, (2005).
  • Richardson, J.T. E., Gender differences in responses to the approaches to studying inventory. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 3–13, (1993).
  • Richardson, J.T. E., Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 3, 309-325, (1994).
  • Richardson, J.T.E., Approaches to studying in undergraduate and postgraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 2, (1998).
  • Richardson, J.T.E., Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 34, 4, 433–442, (2003).
  • Richardson, J.T.E. ve Price, L., Approaches to studying and perceptions of academics quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational technology. 34 1 45-56, (2003).
  • Rowntree, D., Assessing students: how shall we know them? New York:Kogan Page, (1987). Pp: 1.
  • Sadler-Smith, E., Approaches to studying: age, gender and academics performance. Educational Studies, 22, 3, 367-380, (1996).
  • Scouller, K., The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education 4, 4 453–72, (1998).
  • Scouller, K. ve Prosser, M., Students' experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 3, 267-280, (1994).
  • Segers, M., Gijbels, D. ve Thurlings, M., The relationship between students perception of portfolyo assesment practice and their approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 34, 1, 35-44, (2008).
  • Selçuk, G, S., Çalışkan, S., ve Erol, M., Evaluation of learning approaches for prospective physics teachers. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 2, 25-41, (2007).
  • Semerci, Ç., Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin kopya çekmeye ilişkin tutum ve görüşleri. F.Ü. Sağlık Bil. Dergisi, 18, 3, 139-146, (2004).
  • Senemoglu, N. Berliner, D. Yıldız, G., Dogan, E., Savas, B., Çelik, K., Approaches to learning and study skills of turkish and american students in colleges of education. Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu. Bakü, (2007), pp: 547-551.
  • Senemoğlu, N., Üniversite mezunu öğrencilerin görüşlerine göre üniversite öğretim elemanlarının öğretim etkinlikleri ve öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi ihtiyaçları. I. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongre Bildirileri 1. Adana, (1994), pp: 207-218.
  • Senemoğlu, N., Gelişim ve Öğrenme:Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Ankara: Spot Matbacılık, (1997). Pp: 492
  • Shale, S. ve Trigwell, K., Student Approaches to Learning. http://www.learning.ox.ac.uk/iaul/IAUL+1+2+2.asp (TY). (Erişim: 12 Ekim 2005).
  • Sivan,A., Leung, R. W., Woon, C. ve Kember,D., An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training Internationa, 37, 4, 381-389, (2000).
  • Smith, S. ve Miller, R., Learning approaches: examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational Psychology, 25, 1, 43-53, (2005).
  • Soran, H., Akkoyunlu, B. ve Kavak, Y., Yasam boyu ögrenme becerileri ve eğiticilerin eğitimi programı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi örneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 201-210, (2006).
  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S. ve Gielen, S., On the diynamics of student approaches to learning: the effects of teaching learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279-294, (2006).
  • Student’s Learning Profile. NUS Students' Approaches to Learning and Studying. htttps://online.nus.edu.sg/ cdtl/staff/spq2004 (Erişim: 18Ocak 2005).
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Eğitim-Öğretim Sınav Yönetmeliği http://w3.sdu.edu.tr/download/yonetmelik/egitim_ogretim_sinav_yönetmeligi. pdf (Erişim: 15 Nisan 2008).
  • Svensson, L., On qualitative differences in learning: III. study learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233-243, (1977).
  • Şahin, M. ve Özbay, Y., Üniversite öğrencilerinin empatik sınıf atmosferine ilişkin algılamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 74 -83, (1999).
  • Tavşancıl, E., Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları, (2002).
  • Trigwell, K. ve Prosser, M., Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266,(1991).
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M ve Waterhouse, F., Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 1, 57-70, (1999).
  • TÜSİAD., Eğitim ve Sürdürülebilir Büyüme: Türkiye Deneyimi, Riskler ve Fırsatlar. İstanbul: TÜSİAD Yayınları, (2006). Pp.35-40.
  • Van Rossum, E.J. ve Schenk, S., The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54: 73-88, (1984).
  • Watkins, D. (1983). Depth of processsing and the quality of learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 2, 49-58.
  • Watkins, D., Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Stenberg, R.J ve Zhang, L (ed). Percpectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. London: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Publishers. (2001).
  • Watkins, D. ve Hattie, J., The learning processes of australian university students: ınvestigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384-393, (1981).
  • Wierstra, R. F.A., Kanselaar, G., Linden, J.L., Lodewijks, H. G.L.C. ve Vermunt, J. D., The impact of the university context on European students’ learning approaches and learning environment preferences. Higher Education 45, 503–523, (2003).
  • Wilson, K. ve Fowler, J., Assessing the impact of learning environment on students approaches to learning:comparing, conventional and action learning designs. Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 1, 87-101, (2005).
  • Ylijoki, O., Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying – A case study of four Finnish university departments, Higher Education, 39, 339-362, (2000)
  • YÖK., Öğrencilerin Eğitimi Değerlendirmesi. http://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/raporlar/egitimdeger/egitimdeger.html (2000). (Erişim: 06. Mayıs 2008).
  • YÖK. SCI+SSCI+AHCI’ya göre 2005-2006 Öğretim Yılı Üniversitelerin Yayın Sıralaması. http://www.yok.gov.tr/duyuru/duyuru_2006/2005_ogretim_yaysayisi.pdf
  • Yükseköğretim Kanunu, No. 2547, www.yok.gov.tr/mevzuat (Erişim: 7 Mart 2007).
APA EKİNCİ N (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. , 1 - 259.
Chicago EKİNCİ Necla Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. (2008): 1 - 259.
MLA EKİNCİ Necla Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. , 2008, ss.1 - 259.
AMA EKİNCİ N Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. . 2008; 1 - 259.
Vancouver EKİNCİ N Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. . 2008; 1 - 259.
IEEE EKİNCİ N "Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri." , ss.1 - 259, 2008.
ISNAD EKİNCİ, Necla. "Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri". (2008), 1-259.
APA EKİNCİ N (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. , 1 - 259.
Chicago EKİNCİ Necla Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. (2008): 1 - 259.
MLA EKİNCİ Necla Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. , 2008, ss.1 - 259.
AMA EKİNCİ N Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. . 2008; 1 - 259.
Vancouver EKİNCİ N Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri. . 2008; 1 - 259.
IEEE EKİNCİ N "Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri." , ss.1 - 259, 2008.
ISNAD EKİNCİ, Necla. "Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi ve öğretme-öğrenme süreci değişkenleri ile ilişkileri". (2008), 1-259.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 0:50

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları