Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları

0 0

Proje Grubu: SOBAG Sayfa Sayısı: 226 Proje No: 107K551 Proje Bitiş Tarihi: 01.03.2009 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik Psikoloji Davranış Bilimleri
Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, No. 211.
  • Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding Teacher Change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367.
  • Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28.
  • Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Gibson, G. J. (1997). Relationships between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested. Intelligence, 25(1), 49-70.
  • Baki, A. & Gökçek, T. (2007). Elementary teachers' concerns about the new mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Paper presented at the International Symposium Elementary Mathematics Teaching, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44.
  • Baumgarten, F. (1933). The character traits. In Beitraege zur Charakter-und Persoenlichkeitsforschung (Whole No. 1). A. Francke, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Beijaard D., & de Vries, Y. (1997). Building expertise: A process perspective on the development or change of teachers' beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20(3), 243-255.
  • Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69-81.
  • Blanch, P. E. D. (2001). Teaching styles of faculty and learning styles of their students: Congruent versus incongruent teaching styles with regards to academic disciplines and gender. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(10- A), 3869.
  • Block, J. (1995). A contarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10, 377-404.
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Borg, M. G., & Riding, R. J. (1993). Teacher stress and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(2), 271-286.
  • Borgatta, E. F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9, 8-17.
  • Bouchard, G., Lussier, Y., & Sabourin, S. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 651-660.
  • Briggs, S. R. (1989). The optimal level of measurement for personality constructs. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 246-260). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Brousseau, B. A., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. (1988). Teacher Beliefs and the Cultures of Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 33.
  • Burkard, M. I. (1962). Discernment of teacher characteristics by TAT sequence analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 279-287.
  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 129-140.
  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057-1068.
  • Butt, R.L., Raymond, D., & Ray, G. (1989). Biographical and contextual influences on an ordinary teacher's thoughts and actions. In J. Lowyck & C. M. Clarke (Eds.), Teacher thinking and professional action. Belgium: Leuven University Press.
  • Çakıroğlu, E. (2008). The teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers in the USA and Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(1), 33-44.
  • Cano-Garcia, F. J., Padilla-Munoz, E. M., & Carrasco-Ortiz, M. A. (2005). Personality and contextual variables in teacher burnout. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 929-940.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38,476-506.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
  • Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). The handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  • Celep, C. (2000). The correlation of the factors: The prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs, and attitudes about student control. National FORUM of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 17E(4), 99-112.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 237-250.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2004). A possible model to understand the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 249-264.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Personality and intellectual competence. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241-250.
  • Chan, D. W. (2008). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 181-194.
  • Chapman, O. (1999). Inservice teachers’ development in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 121-142.
  • Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 177-193). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Charambous, C., Philippou, G, & Kyriakides, L. (2004). Towards a unified model on teachers’ concerns and efficacy beliefs related to a mathematics reform. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.
  • Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157-176.
  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1979). Three studies of teacher planning (Research series No. 55). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University: Institute for Research on Teaching.
  • Clark, C., & Lampert, M. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, Sept.-Oct., 27-31.
  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers'Sense of Efficacy and Commitment to Teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337.
  • Cooney, T. J. (1994). In-service programs in mathematics education. In S. Fitzsimmons & L. C. Kerpelman (Eds.), Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics: Status, issues and problems (pp. 8.1-8.36). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Center for Science and Technology Policy Studies.
  • Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E., & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306-333.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventorry manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEOPI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Crawford, A. R., Chamblee, G. E. and Rowlett, R. J. (1998). Assessing concerns of algebra teachers during a curriculum reform: A constructivist approach. Journal of In-service Education 24, 317–327.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPearson Education.
  • Czerniak, C. M. (1990). A study of self-efficacy, anxiety, and science knowledge in preservice elementary teachers. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
  • Çetinkaya, B., & Erbaş, A. K. (yayına hazırlanmakta). An analysis of the validity and reliability of the concerns based adoption model in a Turkish sample.
  • Çetinkaya, B., & Masingila, J. O. (2006). Change in mathematics teachers’ views and practices: the role of personality characteristics. Third International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. http://cw.mariancollege.edu/mreardon/755/document%20 repository/ LDH_1999.pdf
  • DeFruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1996). Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement. European Journal of Personality, 10, 405-425.
  • Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 173.
  • DeMesquita, P. B., & Drake, J. C. (1994). Educational reform and self-efficacy beliefs of teachers implementing nongraded primary school programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(3), 291-302.
  • DFE (1997). Mathematics in the national curriculum. London: DFE Welch Office.
  • Doherty, J. (1980). An exploratory investigation into the relationship between selfesteem and teaching performance in a group of student teachers. Educational Review, 32(1), 21-34.
  • Dollinger, S. J., & LaMartina, A. K. (1998). A note on moral reasoning and five-factor model. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(2), 349-358.
  • Doyle, W. (1985). Recent research on classroom management: Implications for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 31-35.
  • Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 467-479.
  • Duff, A., Boyle, E., & Dunleavy, J. F. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907−1920.
  • Easterly, J. L. (1985). Outstanding teachers: Pathfinders for the profession. Action in Teacher Education, 6(3), 1-5.
  • Ekstrom, R. B. (1976). Teacher aptitudes, knowledge, attitudes, and cognitive style as predictors of teaching behavior. Journal of Teacher Education, 27(4), 329- 331.
  • Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further Development of an Elementary Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument: A Preservice Elementary Scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
  • Entwisle, N. J., & Cunningham, S. (1968). Neuroticism and school attainment: A linear relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 123-132.
  • Entwisle, N. J., & Entwisle, D. (1970). The relationship between personality, study methods and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 132-143.
  • Evans, E. D., & Tribble, M. (1986). Perceived Teaching Problems, Self-Efficacy, and Commitment to Teaching among Preservice Teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 80(2), 81-85.
  • Erbaş, A. K., & Çetinkaya, B. (incelemede). A psychometric evaluation of Turkish adaptation of the mathematics teacher efficacy belief instrument for in-service teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1982). Personality, genetics, and behavior. New York: Praeger.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1224-1237.
  • Farsides, T., & Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1225-1243.
  • Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
  • Flanagan, D. E. (1961). A study of the relationship of scores on the MMPI to success in teaching as indicated by supervisory ratings. Journal of Experimental Education, 29, 329-354.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. (3. Basım). McGraw-Hill Inc.
  • Fullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 12-17.
  • Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
  • Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterization of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 39-57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Furnham, A. F. (1997). Knowing and faking one’s Five-Factor personality score. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69(1), 229-243.
  • Gay, L. R. (1995). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. (5. Basım). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  • Gencer, A. S., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 664-675.
  • George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  • Ghaith, G., & Shaaban (1999). The relationship between perception of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496.
  • Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 451-458.
  • Gibson, S., & Brown, R. (1982). Teachers' sense of efficacy: Changes due to experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Sacramento.
  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer , S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  • Goldgerg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-31.
  • Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics in transition (pp. 19-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Guddemi, M., Swick, K., & Brown, M. (1987). Personality dimensions of prospective teachers: A critical analysis. Teacher Educator, 22(3), 2-7.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1984). The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 245-259.
  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 4(1), 63-69.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.
  • Gülgöz, S. (2002). Five-factor model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 175-196). New York, NY: Kluwer.
  • Hall, G. E. (1985). A stages of concern approach to teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
  • Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions, Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.
  • Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 280-288.
  • Hartman, R. O., & Betz, N. E. (2007). The Five-Factor Model and Career SelfEfficacy: General and Domain-Specific Relationships. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(2), 145.
  • Heaven, P., Mak, A., Barry, J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2002). Personality and family influences on adolescent attitudes to school and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 453-462.
  • Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1994). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context: psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(3), 441-444.
  • Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1998). Taking charge of change. Southwest Educational Development Library, Austin: TX.
  • Huey, S. J., & Weisz, J. R. (1997). Ego control, ego resiliency, and the Five-Factor Model as predictors of behavioral and emotional problems in clinic-referred children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 404-415.
  • Işıksal, M., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2005). Teacher efficacy and academic performance. Academic Exchange Quarterly 9(4), 28–32.
  • Jerram, K. L., & Coleman, P. G. (1999). The big five personality traits and reporting of health problems and health behavior in old age. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4(2), 181-192.
  • John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1998). Recent trends in Big Five Research: Development, predictive validity, and personality types. In J. Bermudez et al. (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 6, pp. 6-16). Tilbourg, The Netherlands: Tilbourg University Press.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1998). The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). new York: Guilford.
  • John, O. P., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (1991). Is there a basic level of personality description? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 348-361.
  • Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., & Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Selfefficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127.
  • Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
  • Jung, C. G. (1976). Psychological types. In R. F. C. Hull (Ed.), Collected works (Vol. 18). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kagan, D. M., & Smith, K. E. (1988). Beliefs and behaviors of kindergarten teachers. Educational Research, 30(1), 26-35.
  • Kaorevaar, G. ( 1990). Secondary school teachers' courses of action in relation to experience and sense of self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  • Kise, J. A. G. (2006). Differentiated coaching: A framework for helping teachers change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Klages, L. (1926). The science of character (Translated 1932). London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Knoblauch, D., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids.” The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 166-179.
  • Kokkinos, C. M. (2007). Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 229-243.
  • Kyriakides, L., Charalambous, C., Philippou, G., & Campbell, R. J. (2006). Illuminating reform evaluation studies through incorporating teacher effectiveness research: A case study in mathematics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 3-32.
  • Lange, C. M. (1973). A study of the effects on learning of matching the cognitive styles of students and instructors in nursing education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33(9-A), 4742-4743.
  • Langston, C. A., & Sykes, W. E. (1997). Beliefs and the Big Five: Cognitive bases of broad individual differences in personality. Journal of Research in Personality 31(2), 141-165.
  • Lawrence, M. V. M. (1997). Secondary school teachers and learning style preferences: Action or watching in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 157-170.
  • Lieberman, S. A, Stroup, B. C. A., & Peel, J. L. (1998). Predictors of intellectual satisfaction in medical school: sociodemographic, cognitive, and personality factors. Academic Medicine, 73(10), S44-S46.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.
  • Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.
  • Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure-specific components of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431-453.
  • Loucks, S. F., Newlove, B. W., & Hall, G. E. (1998). Measuring levels of use of an innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
  • Maccaffrey, J. D. Jr. (1996). Instructor personality, course type, and teaching effectiveness in higher education. Dissertation Abstracts International-Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 56(9A), 3472.
  • Manning, B. H., & Payne, G. D. (1984). Student teacher personality as a variable in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 20(2), 2-12.
  • Manouchehri, A. (2000). Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(1), 1-34.
  • Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. J. (2003). Personality traits (2nd edition). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). San Diego: Academic.
  • McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the Efficacy-Based Change Model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 471-485.
  • Mewborn, D. S. (2002). Examining mathematics teachers’ beliefs through multiple lenses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA
  • Ministere de l’Education Nationale (1997). Progammes de mathematiques, Paris: MENRT.
  • Mitchell, J. V. (1965). Personality characteristics associated with motives for entering teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 46, 529-532.
  • Moore, W. P., & Esselman, M. E. (1992). Teacher Efficacy, Empowerment, and a Focused Instructional Climate: Does Student Achievement Benefit? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Morros, M., Pushkar, D., & Reis, M. (1998). A study of current, former, and new elderly volunteers: a comparison of developmental and trait models of personality. Journal of Adult Development, 5(4), 219-230.
  • Mulholland, J., Dorman, J. P., & Odgers, B. M. (2004). Assessment of science teaching efficacy of preservice teachers in an Australian university. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 313-331.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
  • Muris, P., Schmidt, H., Merckelbach, H., & Rassin, E. (2000). Reliability, factor structure and validity of the Dutch Eysenck Personality Profiler. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(5), 857-868.
  • Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Newlove, B. W., & Hall, G. E. (1976). A Manual for Assesing Open-Ended Statements of Concern About an Innovation. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, Austin, TX: Univeristy of Texas.
  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
  • Norman, W. T. (1967). 2,800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
  • O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of postsecondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971-990.
  • Odabaş, A., Pesen, C., Çelik, C., Epçaçan, C. (2007). İlköğretim sınıf öğretmenlerinin matematik dersi öğretim programının etkililiğine ilişkin görüşleri. I. Ulusal İlköğretim kongresi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Özbek, R., Oral. B., & Sevgi, M. (2006). 2005-2006 Eğitim-öğretim yılında uygulanmaya konan yeni ilköğretim programlarının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. XV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Muğla Üniversitesi, Muğla, Türkiye.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers'Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
  • Parker, W. D., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1005-1025.
  • Philips, D. A., Carlisle, C. S., Hautala, R., & Larson, R. (1985). Personality traits and teacher-student behaviors in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 408-416.
  • Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1987). Relationships between student characteristics and changes in attitudes, concerns, anxieties, and confidence about teaching during teacher preparation. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 109-115.
  • Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1997). Relationships between the personal and academic attributes of and affective differences between current and past teacher candidates, The Teacher Educator, 33,124-139.
  • Pittman, R. B. (1985). Perceived instructional effectiveness and associated teaching dimensions. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 34-39.
  • QSR Int., (2008). QSR NVivo [Computer software]. Doncaster Victoria, Australia: QSR International.
  • Reeves, C. K., & Kazelskis, R. (1985). Concerns of preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 78(5), 267-271.
  • Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Riggs, I. M. (1991). Gender differences in elementary science teacher self-efficacy. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Rimmer, R. J. (1997). Personality and teachers’ student control ideology. Dissertation Abstracts International-Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 57(11A), 4617.
  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factos and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 789.
  • Romberg, T.A. (1997). Mathematics in context: Impact on teachers. In E. Fennema & B.S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 357–380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sandven, J. (1969). Do we select the right people for teacher training? Pedagogica Europea: The European Yearbook of Educational Research, 5, 113-136.
  • Sashkin, M., & Egermeier, J. (1992). School Change Models and Processes: A Review of Research and Practice. Washington DC: United States.
  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. (pp. 21-50): Guilford Press, New York, NY, US.
  • Senger, E. S. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 199-221.
  • Shafer, A. B. (2000). Mediation of the big five’s effect on career decision making by life task dimensions and on money attitudes by materialism. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 93-109.
  • Shiner, R.L. & Masten, A. S. (2002). Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade level and achievement level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386- 398.
  • Shiner, R. L., Masten, A. S., & Roberts, J. M. (2003). Childhood personality foreshadows adult personality and life outcomes two decades later. Journal of Personality, 71, 1145-1170.
  • Sırmacı, N., & Gençdoğan, B. (2007). İlköğretim birinci kademe matematik dersi yeni programına ilişkin öğretmenlerin görüşleri. I. Ulusal İlköğretim kongresi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education referral. Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 66- 81.
  • Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 401-411.
  • SPSS, Inc. (2008). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 17.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
  • Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary preservice teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139-47.
  • Tarpey, M. S. (1965). Personality factors in teacher trainee selection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 35, 140-149.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers beliefs' and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
  • Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 349-362.
  • Tokar, D. M. (1995). Evaluation and correspondence between Holland’s vocational personality typology and the five-factor model. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(9-B), 4217.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202.
  • Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. C. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Technical Report, USAF, Lackland Air Force Base, TX.
  • Van den Berg, R., & Ros, A. (1999). The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 879.
  • Van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 331–350.
  • Walberg, H. J., & Waxman, H. C. (1983). Teaching, learning, and the management of instruction. In D. C. Smith (Ed.), Essential knowledge for beginning educators. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
  • Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-147). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 581-610). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zhang, L. (2003). Does the big five predict learning approaches?. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431-1446.
  • Zhang, L. (2006). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1177-1187.
  • Zhang, L. (2007). Do personality traits make a difference in teaching styles among Chinese high school teachers? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 669-679.
  • Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teachers’ characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 3-12.
APA ÇETİNKAYA B (2009). Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. , 1 - 226.
Chicago ÇETİNKAYA Bülent Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. (2009): 1 - 226.
MLA ÇETİNKAYA Bülent Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. , 2009, ss.1 - 226.
AMA ÇETİNKAYA B Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. . 2009; 1 - 226.
Vancouver ÇETİNKAYA B Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. . 2009; 1 - 226.
IEEE ÇETİNKAYA B "Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları." , ss.1 - 226, 2009.
ISNAD ÇETİNKAYA, Bülent. "Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları". (2009), 1-226.
APA ÇETİNKAYA B (2009). Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. , 1 - 226.
Chicago ÇETİNKAYA Bülent Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. (2009): 1 - 226.
MLA ÇETİNKAYA Bülent Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. , 2009, ss.1 - 226.
AMA ÇETİNKAYA B Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. . 2009; 1 - 226.
Vancouver ÇETİNKAYA B Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları. . 2009; 1 - 226.
IEEE ÇETİNKAYA B "Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları." , ss.1 - 226, 2009.
ISNAD ÇETİNKAYA, Bülent. "Reform sürecinde öğretmenleri anlamak: ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin kişisel karakteristikleri ve reform ile ilgili kaygıları". (2009), 1-226.