4 8

Proje Grubu: İÇTAG Sayfa Sayısı: 93 Proje No: 102I005 Proje Bitiş Tarihi: 01.12.2008 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İnşaat Mühendisliği İnşaat ve Yapı Teknolojisi Jeoloji
Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AKSIT, B., KARANCI, A. N., & ANAFARTA, M. Disaster preparedness training through local trainers: An implementation and assessment in a province of Turkey. Paper presented at “Hazards 2002- Ninth International Symposium on Natural and Human-made hazards: Disaster Mitigation in the Perspective of the New Millennium”, Antalya, Turkey.
  • ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, S. A. ed. (1994) Post Earthquake Emergency Damage and Usability Assessment of Buildings, 22-24 September 1993 Proceedings, European Commission / DG XI, Civil Protection and EPPO of Greece, Athens.
  • ANDRANAKIS, V., DANDOULAKI, M., PAPADOPOULOS, N. Disaster response and reconstruction measures after the 1999 Athens earthquake of September 7th, 1999 (M=5,9). Newsletter of ECPFE, Issue 3, pp.40-44.
  • Ano Liosia (2002) Presentation on Reconstruction Program of Ano Liosia Municipality After the 1999 Earthquake, Technical Department Division of Renewal-Reconstruction.
  • ANSAL, A. “Impact of Microzonation Studies on Urban Planning and their Effectiveness in Urban Vulnerability Reduction—Experience from Turkey” The Third International Workshop on Earthquakes and Megacities Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China, 31 October-2 November, 2002.
  • ANSAL, A. (2003) “Site Characterization and Site Amplification for a Seismic Microzonation Study in Turkey,” Based on a project funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and Implemented by the World Institute for Disaster Risk Management, Submitted as input to the Project, 2003.
  • AZARIAN, A. and Skriptchenko-Gregorian, V., “Children in natural disaster: an experience of the 1988 earthquake in Armenia,” The American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress, Inc., 1998.
  • BALAMIR, M. Recent Changes in Turkish Disasters Policy: A Strategical Reorientation? In P.R. Kleindorfer and M.R. Sertel (Eds.), Mitigation and Financing of Seismic Risks, Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands, 2001.
  • BALAMIR, M., Methods and Tools in Urban Risk Management, Earthquakes and Design for Safer Cities, In E. Komut (Editor), Natural Disasters: Designing for Safety, International Union of Architects and the Chamber of the Architects of Turkey, Ankara, 2001.
  • BALAMIR, M., “Painful steps of progress from crisis planning to contingency planning: changes for disaster preparedness in Turkey”, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2002, pp. 39-49).
  • BALAMIR, M., Microzonation for Earthquake Mitigation, Background Report on Sustainable Implementation: Legal and Organizational Bases of Land Use in Turkey, METU, October 2002.
  • BERGIANNAKI-DERMITZAKI, I.D., Prevention & mitigation of the psychosocial consequences of earthquakes, The European Center for Prevention and Forecasting of Earthquakes-Earthquake Planning & Protection Organization, Ministry of Environment and Public Works, Athens, 2003.
  • BRAUCH, H. G., “Urbanization and natural disasters in the Mediterranean: population growth and climate change in the 21st Century, “The Future of Disaster Risk: Building Safer Cities”, ProVention Consortium and the World Bank’s Disaster Management Facility, Washington, D.C., 4-6 December, 2002.
  • BRITTON, N. R., “EdM Framework for Urban Vulnerability Reduction” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002.
  • CENDIM, Center for Disaster Management, http://www.cendim.boun.edu.tr . Crisis Management Center of Prime Ministry of Turkish Republic (2000). Depremler
  • CHAUVIN, B. and HERMAND, D., “From Disaster Risk Assessment to Risk Management in Megacities”, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • CIGLER, B.A., “Current policy issues in mitigation,” In L.K. Comfort (Ed), Managing disaster: strategies and policy perspectives, Duke University Press, Durham and London, 1988, pp. 39-52.
  • COMFORT, L. K. and SUNGU, Y., “Organizational Learning from Seismic Risk: The 1999 Marmara and Duzce Turkey Earthquakes” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • DANDOULAKI, M. “Planning for the temporary sheltering of the homeless in semipermanent housing: the Greek experience during the period 1986-1995: Proceedings of the conference on Regional Development, Land-Use Planning and the Environment in the context of the European Union”, Vol. II (Land-Use and Regional Planning), Panteios University, Athens, 15-16 December 1995, pp. 240-254 (In Greek)
  • DANDOULAKI, M., et al., “An Overview of post-Earthquake Inspection Practices in Greece and the Introduction of a Rapid Building Usability Evaluation Procedure after the 1996 Konitsa Earthquake”, Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris 6-11 Sept. 1998.
  • DANDOULAKI, M., Lessons Learnt from the September 7th 1999 Earthquake in Attica, Greece (Ms= 5,9), The Nedies Project: Experts meeting on “Lessons Learnt from Earthquakes in Greece”, Athens, 27 June 2000.
  • DELADETSIMAS, P. et al., “Designing a Decision Support Tool for an Emergency Management Application”, Geographic Information Systems in Urban, Regional and Environmental Planning, Proceedings, 1996 (Date of Conference??).
  • DRABEK, T.E., Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of human findings, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1986.
  • DYNES, R.R. and QUARANTELLI, E.L., ‘Role simplification in disaster,” In National Institute of Mental Health, Role stressors and supports for emergency workers: Proceedings from a 1984 workshop sponsored by the NIMH and the FEMA, Center for Mental Health Studies of EMERGENCIES, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, 1985, pp. 23-37.
  • ECPPFE and EPPO (1999) Technical Handbook for Search and Rescue Operations in Earthquakes, European Centre on Prevention and Forecasting of Earthquakes (ECPFE) and Earthquake Planning and Protection Organisation (EPPO), Ministry of Environment and Public Works, Access Soft Ltd., Athens.
  • ECEVIT, M., & KASAPOGLU, A. (2002). Demographic and psychosocial features and their effects on the survivors of the 1999 earthquake in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(2), 195-202.
  • EDWARDS, M.L., “Social location and self-protective behavior: implications for earthquake preparedness”, The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11 (No. 3), 1993, pp. 293-305. Emergencies Research Center (ERC) pamphlet of activities
  • ERDIK, M., “Disaster management scenarios”, a contribution to the topical discussion “why are disaster management scenarios useful?”, Sept. 2-6, 1996, UN-IDNDR Internet Conference “Solutions for Cities at Risk”, 26 August-25 October 1996, pp. 36-65.
  • ERDIK M. and AYDINOGLU, N., “Earthquake Risk to Buildings in Istanbul and a Proposal toward its Mitigation, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • FARLEY, J. E., BARLOW, H.D., FINKELSTEIN M.S. & ILEY, L., “Earthquake hysteria, before and after: a survey and follow-up of public response to the Browning forecast”, The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11 (No. 3), 1993, pp. 305-323.
  • FRIEDMAN, B.J., The art of storytelling: the structuring and processing of news during disasters, Miscellaneous Report No. 30, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 1987, 140 pp.
  • GHEORGHE, A. V. & VAMANU, D.V., “Quantitative vulnerability assessment and management of critical infrastructures: indicators and structural changes”, 2nd Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting, Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnverability and Resilience, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • GULKAN, P. et al., “Just how Prescient are our Building Damage Predictions?”, The major part of the work… was carried out during the course of a multiparty study titled, “Microzonation for EQ Risk Mitigation,” funded by the Government of Switzerland and executed through the World Institute for Disaster Risk Management”.. Submitted as input to the Bilateral Project, 2003
  • GULKAN, P. “Setting the stage for urban risk mitigation: seismic risks and compulsory insurance policy issues in Turkey,” Second Annual IIASADPRI Meeting, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002.
  • GULKAN, P., S. BAKIR, K. Ö. ÇETIN, A. YAKUT, T. YILMAZ, İ. KAZAZ and U. YAZGAN (2003): “Background Report on Structural Damage for Adapazarı, Turkey: Interpretation and Soils Correlation,” final report submitted to DRM, World Institute for Disaster Risk Management, METU Disaster Management Research Center, February, 92 pp.
  • GULKAN, P., A. YAKUT, H. SUCUOGLU, M.S. YUCEMEN, and E. ÇITIPITIOGLU, "A Damage Assessment Form for Engineered Buildings in Turkey,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. 95-01, Middle East Technical University, December, 1994 (in Turkish).
  • GULKAN, P., and A. YAKUT, "An Expert System for Reinforced Concrete Structural Damage Quantification," in Mete A. Sozen Symposium-A Tribute from His Students, Edited by J.K. Wight and M.E. Kreger, ACI Special Publication No. SP-162, 1996, pp.53-71.
  • GULKAN, P., B.S. BAKIR, A. YAKUT, and M.T. YILMAZ (2003): “Just How Prescient Are Our Building Damage Predictions?” in Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings Proceedings of the NATO Science for Peace Workshop, İzmir, Turkey, from 13 to 14 May 2003 ; edited by S. T. Wasti and G. Özcebe, Kluwer, 2004.
  • GULKAN, P., and M.A. SOZEN, “Procedure for Determining Seismic Vulnerability of Building Structures,” ACI Structural Journal, 96, 3, May, 1999, pp. 336-342. Hellenic National Committee of HABITAT (2000). National report of Greece and basic building and housing standards for Greece and Athens. Pbl. YPEXODE.
  • HIROI, O. et al., «A study of mass media reporting in emergencies , » The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1985, pp. 21-49.
  • JALALI, R., GOLOĞLU, S. (2000) Civil Society and the State: Turkey After the Earthquake, paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Sciological Association.
  • KAJITANI, Y. et al., “Statistical Analysis of Spatial Temporal Distributions of Human Activities after EQ Disaster”, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • KARANCI, N. A., RUSTEMLI, A. (1995). Psychological consequences of the 1992 Erzincan (Turkey) earthquake. Disasters, 19(1), 8-18.
  • KARANCI, N. A., ALKAN, N., Aksit, B., SUCUOGLU, H., BALTA, E. (1999). Gender differences inpsychological distress, coping, social support and related variables following the 1995 Dinar(Turkey) earthquake. North American Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 189-204.
  • KARANCI, N. A., AKSIT, B. (1999). Strengthening community participation in disaster management by strengthening governmental and nongovernmental organizations and networks: A case study from Dinar and Bursa (Turkey). The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4),35-39.
  • KARANCI, N. A. and AKSIT, B., “Bulding Disaster Resistant Communities: Lessons Learned from Past Earthquakes in Turkey and Suggestions for the Future,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Vol. 18 (3), 403-416.
  • KARANCI, N. “Vulnerability and Resilience”, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASADPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002.
  • KASAPOGLU, A., & Ecevit, M. (2003). Impact of the 1999 East Marmara earthquake in Turkey. Population and Environment, 24(4), 339-358
  • KASAPOGLU, A., Ecevit, Y., & Ecevit, M. (2004).Support needs of the survivors of the August 17, 1999 earthquake in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 66(3), 229-248. Republic of Turkey, PIU (2005). Report of the Social Impact Survey, Feasibility Study for Retrofitting of Selected Buildings in İstanbul.
  • KATSOLIS, D., CHLEPAS N., PAPATOLIAS, A. & PASCHOS, L., Metarythmiseis stin topiki autodioikisi: epiptoseis sti dioikisi kai to politico systema (Reforms in local government: impact on administration and the political system), The A. Papandreou Foundations for Strategical and Development Studies, Athens, March 2001 (In Greek).
  • KRAMER, R.A. “Advantages and limitations of Benefit-Cost Analysis for Evaluating Investments in Natural Disasters Mitigation” in M. Munasinghe and C. Clarke, Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development: Economic and Policy Issues, Washington, D.C., The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank, 1995, pp. 61-76;
  • LAUBE, J., “Health care providers as disaster victims,” In J. Laube and S.A. Murphy (Eds.), Perspectives on disaster recovery, Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1985, pp. 210- 228.
  • LINDY, J.D. and LINDY, J.G., “Observations on the media and disaster recovery period,” In J. Laube and S.A. MURPHY (Eds.), Perspectives on disaster recovery, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk,CN, 1985, pp. 295-303.
  • MARMUREANU, G. et al., “The Vulnerability and Resistance of Large Urban Systems to Natural and Technological Disasters from Romania and Neighboring Countries”, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • MECHLER, R., “Natural Disaster Risk and Cost-Benefit Analysis”, The World Bank Conference on Safe Cities, December 2002. Media Services for the Olympic 2004. Greece in brief: Political system, constitution and institutions. In http://www.mediainfo2004.gr
  • MELKUMYAN, M. et al., “The Behavior of Retrofitted Buildings during Earthquakes: New Technologies”, Paper presented at the Conference, “The Future of Disaster Risk: Building Safer Cities”, ProVention Consortium and the World Bank’s Disaster Management Facility, Washington, D.C., 4-6 December, 2002.
  • MIKAMI, S. et al., A cross-cultural comparative study in mass communication in disaster, Article No. 235, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 1992.
  • Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works of Greece (YPEXODE). http://www.minenv.gr/ Ministry of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization of Greece Program "Ioannis Kapodistrias". (2005, 10 August). http://www.ypes.gr/kapodistrias/english/kapo/fr_prog.htm
  • Ministry of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization of Greece (YPESDA). www.ypes.gr
  • Mileti, D.S., Hutton, J.R., and Sorensen, J.H., Earthquake prediction response and options for public policy, Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, The University of Colorado, 1981.
  • MILETI, D. S., Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C 1999.
  • MITCHELL, J. T., “The impact of stress on emergency service personnel: policy issues in emergency response,” In L.K. Comfort (Ed.), Managing disaster: strategies and policy perspectives, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1988, pp. 199-214.
  • MUKERJEE, T., Economic analysis of natural hazards: a preliminary study of adjustments to earthquakes and their costs, Working Paper, Natural Hazard Research, Working Paper No. 17, Colorado, USA, 1971, 51p.
  • NIGG, J.M. and TIERNEY, K.J., “Disasters and social change: consequences for community construct and affect)”, American Sociological Association Meeting, Miami, Florida, August 13-17, 1993.
  • Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator, Shelter after disaster:guidelines for assistance, United Nations, Geneva, 1982.
  • OKABE, Keizo et al, “Survey research on the attitude of Tokyo residents toward the prospective earthquake and the prediction warning”, In E. L. QUARANTELLI, Inventory of the Japanese Disaster Research Literature in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, The Ohio State University Disaster Research Center, Columbus, Ohio, 1982.
  • OLIVER-SMITH, A. & HOFFMAN, S.M., The angry earth: disaster in anthropological perspective, Rutledge, New York, 1999.
  • ONCULER, A., “Turkish Homeowners’ Willingless to Pay for Earthquake Mitigation Measures,” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • ONODA, T., “Role of Non-life insurance in disaster management systems” in The Effects of disasters on modern societies, World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, Yokohama, 23-27 May 1994.
  • PAHO (Pan-American Health Organization), Management of Dead Bodies in Disaster Situations: Disaster Manuals and Guidelines Series, No. ”, Pan-American Health Organization-World Health Organization, Washington, D.C. 2001.
  • PETAK, W. J., “Earthquake Resilience through Mitigation: A System Approach”, Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of IIASA-DPRI on “Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience”, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002.
  • PETROPOULOS, N., “A survey of household earthquake preparedness: the case of Pyrgosd, Greece”, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Local Authorities confronting Disasters and Emergencies (LACDE), Amsterdam,22-24 April 1996, pp.
  • PETROPOULOS, N., “The impact of the August-September 1999 earthquakes on Greco-Turkish relations: a preliminary study,” 5th European Sociological Association Conference, Helsinki, Finland, Aug. 28-Sept. 1, 2001.
  • PETROPOULOS, A. Zisiadis, K. Ioannidis, T. Papadopoulos and D. Pyrros., The Parnitha earthquake: Self-evaluation and proposals of organizations for the organization of civil protection, Emergencies Research Center/Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization, Athens 2003 (In Greek),
  • PETROPOULOS Petropoulos N.P. et al., Assessment of the existent EQ protection information materials from a communicational and pedagogical perspective, Third Community Support Framework Support-General Secretariat for Research and Technology Project “Seismopolis”, Pedagogical Institute, June 2004 (In Greek).
  • POMONIS, A. (2002): The Mount Parnitha (Athens) earthquake of September 7, 1999: A disaster management perpective. Natural Hazards, 27, pp. 171- 199
  • PRINCE, S.H., Catastrophe and social change: based on a sociological change of the Halifax Disaster, Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University Department of Political Science, New York, 1920.
  • PSARROS, K. et al, “The relationship between the immediate psychological reactions and the later psychopathological manifestations in an urban population following a destructive earthquake”, 16th Panhellenic Psychiatry Convention, 5-9 May 2000, Abstracts Volume, Hellenic |Psychiatric Society, Paphos, Cyprus, 2000.
  • QUARANTELLI, E.L., “An assessment of conflicting views on mental health: the consequences of traumatic events,” In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake, New York: Bruner/Mazel, 1985, pp. 174-215.
  • RIBEIRO, M. J., Social Vulnerability of Disasters, Communication Presented in the Third Portuguese Congress of Sociology, organized by the Portuguese Sociology Association, February 1996.
  • RUSTEMLI A. and KARANCI, N “Correlates of EQ cognitions and preparatory behaviour in a victimized population”, The Journal of SocialPsychology, 139 (1), 1999, pp. 91-101.
  • SAPOUNTZAKI, K. & DANDOULAKI, M. “Coping with seismic risk in Greece: The traditional merits of the system and the challenges for the future”, In GREIVING, S., FLEISSCHAUER, M., FIRUS, K. (eds.) Natural Hazards and Spatial Planning in Europe (to be published in 2006),Comparative Methodologies for Comprehensive Urban Earthquake Mitigation: the Cases of Istanbul and Athens 178.
  • SAPOUNTZAKI, K. & DANDOULAKI, M. Country Reoprt of Greece, the Armonia Project of EU, Contract Number: 511208.
  • SEYNAEVE, G., Psychosocial support in situations of mass emergencies, A European Union Policy Paper (Preliminary Document-Draft Version 01), Belgian Ministry of Public Health, Brussells, 2001.
  • SHIGA, T., A. SHIBATA, and T. TAKAHASHI, “Earthquake Damage and Wall Index of Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Proceedings of the Tohuku District Symposium, Architectural Institute of Japan, No. 12, Dec., 1968, pp. 29- 32 (in Japanese).
  • SMITH, A.W. et al, “Probabilistic Benefit-Cost Analysis for Earthquake Damage Mitigation: Evaluating Measures for Apartment Houses in Turkey”, 2nd Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting, Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnverability and Resilience, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29-31, 2002
  • SUMMERFIELD, D., “The invention of post-traumatic stress disorder and the social usefulness of a psychiatric category,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 322, January 13, 2001, pp. 95-98.
  • TABOROFF, J. Natural Disasters and Urban Cultural Heritage: A Reassessment, Paper presented at the Conference, “The Future of Disaster Risk: Building Safer Cities”, Provention Consortium and the World Bank’s Disaster Management Facility, Washington, D.C., 4-6 December, 2002.
  • TIERNEY, K.J. and NIGG, J.M., “Earthquakes in the central and eastern United States: social, economic and policy aspects,” In SocioeconomicImpacts: 1993 National Earthquake Conference, Earthquake Reduction in Central and Eastern United States: A Time for Examination and Action, Memphis, Tennessee, Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium, 1996, pp. 3-17.
  • U.S. National Report to the IDNDR World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, Facing the challenge, Yokohama, May 23-27, 1994, National Research Council, 1994.
  • VOULGARIS, N. S. et al., “Combined Geophysical Methods for Detailed Microzoning Studies”, Proceedings of the IV Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Sept. 14- 17, 1998, Barcelona Spain, A. Casas (Ed.), pp. 695-698.
  • WASSENHOVEN, L. H., KARKA, H., SAPOUNTZAKI, K. (2002) Sustainability, Development and Spatial Planning, EC Research Project: “Environment and Climate”.
  • WIEST, R.E., MOCELLIN, J.S.P., & MOTSISI, D.T. (1994). The needs of Women in Disasters and Emergencies. Disaster Research Institute Report, Winnipeg, Monitoba.
  • WISNER, B. Disaster risk reduction in megacities: making the most of human and social capital, World Bank Conference, December 2002
  • WISNER B. and ADAMS, J., Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: a practical guide, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  • YE, Y. and OKADA N., Integrated Relief and Reconstruction Management following a Natural Disaster, Second Annual IIASA Meeting, Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 20-31 July 2002.
  • YOSHII, H., “Social impacts of earthquake prediction in Greece,” Tokyo Institute of Future Technology, 1990.
APA BALAMİR M, ANSAL A, SUCUOĞLU H, GÜLKAN P, Karanci A, AYATA A, KASAPOĞLU A, KOÇYİĞİT A (2008). Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. , 1 - 93.
Chicago BALAMİR Murat,ANSAL Atilla,SUCUOĞLU Haluk,GÜLKAN Polat,Karanci Ayse Nuray,AYATA Ayşe,KASAPOĞLU Aytül,KOÇYİĞİT Ali Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. (2008): 1 - 93.
MLA BALAMİR Murat,ANSAL Atilla,SUCUOĞLU Haluk,GÜLKAN Polat,Karanci Ayse Nuray,AYATA Ayşe,KASAPOĞLU Aytül,KOÇYİĞİT Ali Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. , 2008, ss.1 - 93.
AMA BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. . 2008; 1 - 93.
Vancouver BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. . 2008; 1 - 93.
IEEE BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A "Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri." , ss.1 - 93, 2008.
ISNAD BALAMİR, Murat vd. "Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri". (2008), 1-93.
APA BALAMİR M, ANSAL A, SUCUOĞLU H, GÜLKAN P, Karanci A, AYATA A, KASAPOĞLU A, KOÇYİĞİT A (2008). Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. , 1 - 93.
Chicago BALAMİR Murat,ANSAL Atilla,SUCUOĞLU Haluk,GÜLKAN Polat,Karanci Ayse Nuray,AYATA Ayşe,KASAPOĞLU Aytül,KOÇYİĞİT Ali Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. (2008): 1 - 93.
MLA BALAMİR Murat,ANSAL Atilla,SUCUOĞLU Haluk,GÜLKAN Polat,Karanci Ayse Nuray,AYATA Ayşe,KASAPOĞLU Aytül,KOÇYİĞİT Ali Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. , 2008, ss.1 - 93.
AMA BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. . 2008; 1 - 93.
Vancouver BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri. . 2008; 1 - 93.
IEEE BALAMİR M,ANSAL A,SUCUOĞLU H,GÜLKAN P,Karanci A,AYATA A,KASAPOĞLU A,KOÇYİĞİT A "Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri." , ss.1 - 93, 2008.
ISNAD BALAMİR, Murat vd. "Kentlerde kapsamlı deprem sakınımı için karşılaştırmalı yöntem geliştrime: İstanbul ve Atina örnekleri". (2008), 1-93.